| Literature DB >> 26944081 |
Daniel Rosenfeld1, Youtong Zheng2, Eyal Hashimshoni3, Mira L Pöhlker4, Anne Jefferson5, Christopher Pöhlker6, Xing Yu7, Yannian Zhu8, Guihua Liu7, Zhiguo Yue7, Baruch Fischman3, Zhanqing Li2, David Giguzin3, Tom Goren3, Paulo Artaxo9, Henrique M J Barbosa9, Ulrich Pöschl4, Meinrat O Andreae6.
Abstract
Quantifying the aerosol/cloud-mediated radiative effect at a global scale requires simultaneous satellite retrievals of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations and cloud base updraft velocities (Wb). Hitherto, the inability to do so has been a major cause of high uncertainty regarding anthropogenic aerosol/cloud-mediated radiative forcing. This can be addressed by the emerging capability of estimating CCN and Wb of boundary layer convective clouds from an operational polar orbiting weather satellite. Our methodology uses such clouds as an effective analog for CCN chambers. The cloud base supersaturation (S) is determined by Wb and the satellite-retrieved cloud base drop concentrations (Ndb), which is the same as CCN(S). Validation against ground-based CCN instruments at Oklahoma, at Manaus, and onboard a ship in the northeast Pacific showed a retrieval accuracy of ±25% to ±30% for individual satellite overpasses. The methodology is presently limited to boundary layer not raining convective clouds of at least 1 km depth that are not obscured by upper layer clouds, including semitransparent cirrus. The limitation for small solar backscattering angles of <25° restricts the satellite coverage to ∼25% of the world area in a single day.Entities:
Keywords: CCN concentrations; cloud−aerosol interactions; convective clouds; satellite remote sensing
Year: 2016 PMID: 26944081 PMCID: PMC4889349 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514044113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205