Literature DB >> 26943918

Female patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve even before initiation of chemotherapy when compared with healthy controls and patients with other malignancies.

Jovana Lekovich1, Alexandre L S Lobel2, Joshua D Stewart3, Nigel Pereira2, Isaac Kligman2, Zev Rosenwaks2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate if female patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve prior to initiation of the lymphoma treatment.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation were compared with 365 healthy controls undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation (controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)) and 128 patients with other types of malignancy prompting fertility preservation. The data of all lymphoma patients, all elective, and all the patients with other types of malignancy who met the inclusion criteria and underwent COH for fertility preservation during the study period were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes included serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels (ng/mL) and antral follicle count (AFC).
RESULTS: Patients in the lymphoma group demonstrated significantly lower AMH levels and AFC and had less oocytes harvested and cryopreserved when compared to healthy controls as well as patients with other malignancies.
CONCLUSION: Patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve when compared with healthy controls and patients with other malignancies. This should be taken into consideration when deciding on the dose for COH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMH; Lymphoma; Ovarian reserve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943918      PMCID: PMC4870447          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0689-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  34 in total

Review 1.  Fertility considerations in young women with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Pascale Jadoul; S Samuel Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Response to ovarian stimulation in patients facing gonadotoxic therapy.

Authors:  Lauren N C Johnson; Katherine E Dillon; Mary D Sammel; Brenda L Efymow; Monica A Mainigi; Anuja Dokras; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Serum anti-müllerian hormone levels in healthy females: a nomogram ranging from infancy to adulthood.

Authors:  S Lie Fong; J A Visser; C K Welt; Y B de Rijke; M J C Eijkemans; F J Broekmans; E M Roes; W H M Peters; A C S Hokken-Koelega; B C J M Fauser; A P N Themmen; F H de Jong; I Schipper; J S E Laven
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Effects of soluble products of activated lymphocytes and macrophages (lymphokines and monokines) on human sperm motion parameters.

Authors:  J A Hill; F Haimovici; J A Politch; D J Anderson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Ovarian reserve parameters: a comparison between users and non-users of hormonal contraception.

Authors:  J G Bentzen; J L Forman; A Pinborg; Ø Lidegaard; E C Larsen; L Friis-Hansen; T H Johannsen; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Anterior panhypopituitarism in diffuse large B-cell stage IV lymphoma.

Authors:  Katherine A Valeros; Eric Khoo
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Safety of fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in patients with breast cancer: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Amr A Azim; Maria Costantini-Ferrando; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Yanping Kuang; Qingqing Hong; Qiuju Chen; Qifeng Lyu; Ai Ai; Yonglun Fu; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in female cancer patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Wo; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Random-start GnRH antagonist for emergency fertility preservation: a self-controlled trial.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Mario Brassesco; Margalida Sastre; Manuel Gómez; Julio Herrero; Laura Marque; Arturo Brassesco; Juan José Espinós
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-12
View more
  10 in total

1.  The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System.

Authors:  Jiangxue Qu; Yuehan Li; Shujie Liao; Jie Yan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes.

Authors:  Chiara Di Tucci; Giulia Galati; Giulia Mattei; Alessandra Chinè; Alice Fracassi; Ludovico Muzii
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Oncologic oocyte cryopreservation: national comparison of fertility preservation between women with and without cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer F Kawwass; Lisa M Shandley; Sheree L Boulet; Heather S Hipp
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations.

Authors:  M von Wolff; T Bruckner; T Strowitzki; A Germeyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Eleonora Porcu; Giulia Maria Cillo; Linda Cipriani; Federica Sacilotto; Leonardo Notarangelo; Giuseppe Damiano; Maria Dirodi; Ilaria Roncarati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation.

Authors:  Richard A Anderson; Frédéric Amant; Didi Braat; Arianna D'Angelo; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Isabelle Demeestere; Sandra Dwek; Lucy Frith; Matteo Lambertini; Caroline Maslin; Mariana Moura-Ramos; Daniela Nogueira; Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg; Nathalie Vermeulen
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-11-14

7.  Responses to fertility treatment among patients with cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A V Dolinko; L V Farland; S A Missmer; S S Srouji; C Racowsky; E S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 8.  The role of antimullerian hormone in assessing ovarian damage from chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.

Authors:  Queenie Ho Yan Wong; Richard A Anderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Determinants of ovarian function after response-adapted therapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (RATHL): a secondary analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Richard A Anderson; Rachel Remedios; Amy A Kirkwood; Pip Patrick; Linsey Stevens; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Tom Roberts; Chris Hatton; Nagesh Kalakonda; Don W Milligan; Pam McKay; Clare Rowntree; Fiona M Scott; Peter W M Johnson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 54.433

Review 10.  The Clinical Value and Interpretation of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Women With Cancer.

Authors:  Richard A Anderson; H Irene Su
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.