Literature DB >> 23415997

Response to ovarian stimulation in patients facing gonadotoxic therapy.

Lauren N C Johnson1, Katherine E Dillon, Mary D Sammel, Brenda L Efymow, Monica A Mainigi, Anuja Dokras, Clarisa R Gracia.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy naïve patients undergoing embryo/oocyte banking for fertility preservation (FP) were assessed for response to ovarian stimulation. Fifty FP patients facing gonadotoxic therapy were matched by age, race, cycle number, date of stimulation and fertilization method to patients undergoing IVF for infertility or oocyte donation. There were no differences in baseline FSH, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicle count and total gonadotrophin dose. FP patients had more immature oocytes (2.2 versus 1.1; P=0.03) and lower fertilization rates per oocyte retrieved (52% versus 70%; P=0.002). There were no differences in numbers of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes or fertilized embryos. Subgroup analysis revealed that FP patients taking letrozole required higher gonadotrophin doses (3077IU versus 2259IU; P=0.0477) and had more immature oocytes (3.4 versus 1.2; P=0.03) than matched controls. There were no differences in gonadotrophin dose or oocyte immaturity among FP patients not taking letrozole. Overall, chemotherapy naïve FP patients had similar ovarian reserve, response to stimulation and oocyte and embryo yield compared to controls. Patients who received letrozole required higher gonadotrophin doses and produced more immature oocytes, suggesting that response to ovarian stimulation may be impaired in patients with hormone-sensitive cancers receiving letrozole. With improvement in cancer survival rates, there has been a shift in attention toward management of long-term consequences of cancer therapy, including infertility. Many young women with cancer, particularly those who will be treated with chemotherapy, pursue fertility preservation (FP) strategies for the purpose of banking oocytes or embryos for future use. We examined patients with no prior exposure to chemotherapy who underwent IVF to freeze embryos or oocytes for FP. Fifty FP patients were identified and matched to healthy controls by age, race, cycle number, date of stimulation and fertilization method. There were no differences in baseline measures of ovarian reserve or amount of medication needed to stimulate the ovaries. FP patients had more immature oocytes and lower fertilization rates than controls. There were no differences in number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, rate of maturity or number of fertilized embryos. Subgroup analysis revealed that FP patients taking letrozole required higher gonadotrophin doses and had more immature oocytes compared with matched controls. There were no differences in gonadotrophin dose or oocyte immaturity among FP patients not taking letrozole. We demonstrated that FP patients not previously exposed to chemotherapy have similar ovarian reserve, response to stimulation and oocyte and embryo yield compared with infertile and donor controls. Patients who received letrozole required higher gonadotrophin doses and produced more immature oocytes, suggesting that response to ovarian stimulation may be impaired in patients with hormone-sensitive cancers receiving letrozole.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415997      PMCID: PMC3621088          DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  16 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shevach Friedler; Onder Koc; Yariv Gidoni; Arieh Raziel; Raphael Ron-El
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Women with cancer undergoing ART for fertility preservation: a cohort study of their response to exogenous gonadotropins.

Authors:  Jaime M Knopman; Nicole Noyes; Sheeva Talebian; Lewis C Krey; James A Grifo; Frederick Licciardi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Oocyte assessment and biological performance.

Authors:  L L Veeck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Letrozole reduces estrogen and gonadotropin exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Ariel Hourvitz; Gulnaz Sahin; Ozgur Oktem; Bradley Safro; Aylin Cil; Heejung Bang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Reduced pretreatment ovarian reserve in premenopausal female patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin-lymphoma--evaluation by using antimüllerian hormone and retrieved oocytes.

Authors:  Barbara Lawrenz; Tanja Fehm; Michael von Wolff; Martin Soekler; Stephanie Huebner; Joerg Henes; Melanie Henes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy.

Authors:  Audra D Robertson; Stacey A Missmer; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Triggering ovulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists does not compromise embryo implantation rates.

Authors:  Belen Acevedo; Jose Luis Gomez-Palomares; Elisabetta Ricciarelli; Eleuterio R Hernández
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Safety of fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in patients with breast cancer: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Amr A Azim; Maria Costantini-Ferrando; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Ovarian stimulation to cryopreserve fertilized oocytes in cancer patients can be started in the luteal phase.

Authors:  Michael von Wolff; Christian J Thaler; Torsten Frambach; Cosima Zeeb; Barbara Lawrenz; Roxana M Popovici; Thomas Strowitzki
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Malignancy may adversely influence the quality and behaviour of oocytes.

Authors:  L Pal; L Leykin; J L Schifren; K B Isaacson; Y C Chang; N Nikruil; Z Chen; T L Toth
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System.

Authors:  Jiangxue Qu; Yuehan Li; Shujie Liao; Jie Yan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Oncofertility: a grand collaboration between reproductive medicine and oncology.

Authors:  Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients--efficacy and safety issues.

Authors:  M Shapira; H Raanani; D Meirow
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Brenda L Efymow; Mary D Sammel; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Maren Shapiro; Clarisa Gracia; Suneeta Senapati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience.

Authors:  Eden R Cardozo; Alexcis P Thomson; Anatte E Karmon; Kristy A Dickinson; Diane L Wright; Mary E Sabatini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Female patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve even before initiation of chemotherapy when compared with healthy controls and patients with other malignancies.

Authors:  Jovana Lekovich; Alexandre L S Lobel; Joshua D Stewart; Nigel Pereira; Isaac Kligman; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with cancer is as expected according to an age-specific nomogram.

Authors:  Marta Devesa; Francisca Martínez; Buenaventura Coroleu; Ignacio Rodríguez; Clara González; Pedro Nolasco Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Fertility preservation in women.

Authors:  Jacques Donnez; Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 43.330

10.  Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations.

Authors:  M von Wolff; T Bruckner; T Strowitzki; A Germeyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.