| Literature DB >> 26943134 |
Sabrilhakim Sidek1,2, Norlisah Ramli3, Kartini Rahmat3, Norlina Mohd Ramli4, Fadzlina Abdulrahman4, Tan Li Kuo3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the metabolite concentration of optic radiation in glaucoma patients with that of healthy subjects using Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-MRS).Entities:
Keywords: Glaucoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metabolites; Neurodegeneration; Spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26943134 PMCID: PMC5101279 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4279-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Patient demographics with glaucoma grading
| Healthy subjects | Mild glaucoma | Severe glaucoma | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of optic radiation | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| Gender | Male | 12 (80 %) | 6 (40 %) | 9 (60 %) |
| Female | 3 (20 %) | 9 (60 %) | 6 (40 %) | |
| Age (mean ± SD in years) | 53.9 (± 8.0) | 64.9 (± 8.2) | 69.7 (± 8.2) | |
| Mean RNFL thickness (μm) | Right eye | 84.47 ± 10.44 | 76.37 ± 11.35 | 58.50 ± 6.97 |
| Left eye | 83.60 ± 10.36 | 76.87 ± 12.01 | 58.60 ± 9.05 | |
| Visual field MD scores (dB) | Right eye | −0.99 ± 0.92 | −3.95 ± 1.40 | 21.98 ± 7.35 |
| Left eye | −0.90 ± 0.84 | −4.05 ± 1.15 | 20.17 ± 9.46 | |
SD standard deviation, RNFL retinal nerve fibre layer, MD mean deviation
Fig. 1VOI placement in the optic radiations using FSPGR sequence 3D reconstruction in the (a) sagittal, (b) axial, and (c) coronal views. Arrows indicate the VOI placement
Fig. 2Example of a good, acceptable spectroscopy spectrum from an optic radiation of a healthy subject
Mean values of different metabolite concentrations among healthy and glaucoma subjects (based on per-metabolite basis)
| Metabolites | Healthy subjects | Mild glaucoma | Severe glaucoma |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean (±SD) |
| Mean (±SD) |
| Mean (±SD) | ||
| Creatine (Cr) | 7 | 0.92 ± 0.31 | 11 | 1.03 ± 0.25 | 5 | 0.97 ± 0.25 | 0.627 |
| Phosphocreatine (PCr) | 7 | 1.24 ± 0.26 | 11 | 1.24 ± 0.23 | 5 | 1.40 ± 0.24 | 0.479 |
| Glutamine (Gln) | 7 | 1.84 ± 0.66 | 11 | 2.02 ± 0.47 | 5 | 2.14 ± 0.48 | 0.336 |
| Glutamate (Glu) | 7 | 2.95 ± 0.27 | 11 | 2.95 ± 0.42 | 5 | 3.12 ± 0.81 | 0.734 |
| Glycerophosphocholine (GPC) | 7 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 11 | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 5 | 0.59 ± 0.12 | 0.287 |
|
| 7 | 3.14 ± 0.18 | 11 | 3.25 ± 0.25 | 5 | 3.30 ± 0.43 | 0.210 |
|
| 7 | 0.42 ± 0.16 | 11 | 0.53 ± 0.16 | 5 | 0.55 ± 0.29 | 0.798 |
| GPC + PCh (tCho) | 7 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 11 | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 5 | 0.59 ± 0.12 | 0.287 |
| NAA + NAAG (tNAA) | 7 | 3.57 ± 0.26 | 11 | 3.78 ± 0.21 | 5 | 3.83 ± 0.32 | 0.088 |
| Glu + Gln (Glx) | 7 | 4.79 ± 0.78 | 11 | 4.97 ± 0.59 | 5 | 5.33 ± 0.50 | 0.311 |
| Cr + PCr (tCr) | 7 | 2.15 ± 0.15 | 11 | 2.28 ± 0.24 | 5 | 2.37 ± 0.28 | 0.103 |
Data were expressed as mean (±SD) and analysed using one-way ANOVA. n number of subjects, SD standard deviation
Mean concentration ratios of tNAA/tCr, tCho/tCr, and Glx/tCr among healthy and glaucoma subjects (based on per-metabolite basis)
| Metabolite ratio | Healthy subjects | Mild glaucoma | Severe glaucoma |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean (±SD) |
| Mean (±SD) |
| Mean (±SD) | ||
| tNAA/tCr | 15 | 1.63 ± 0.17 | 15 | 1.67 ± 0.12 | 15 | 1.55 ± 0.16 | 0.23 |
| tCho/tCr | 15 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 15 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 15 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.80 |
| Glx/tCr | 15 | 2.20 ± 0.30 | 15 | 2.19 ± 0.26 | 15 | 2.24 ± 0.26 | 0.86 |
Data were expressed as mean (±SD) and analysed using one-way ANOVA. n number of subjects, SD standard deviation
Fig. 3Boxplot illustrating concentration ratios of tNAA, tCho, and Glx to tCr for the healthy subjects and the mild and severe glaucoma groups in terms of optic radiations (based on per-metabolite basis)