| Literature DB >> 26941576 |
Adam Shaver1, Alexandra Nichols1, Ellen Thompson2, Amrita Mallick1, Kristen Payne1, Chris Jones2, Nandini D P K Manne3, Shanmuga Sundaram1, Joseph I Shapiro1, Komal Sodhi4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is an established complication of diabetes mellitus. In West Virginia, the especially high incidence of diabetes and heart failure validate the necessity of developing new strategies for earlier detection of DCM. Since most DCM patients remain asymptomatic until the later stages of the disease when the fibrotic complications become irreversible, we aimed to explore biomarkers that can identify early-stage DCM.Entities:
Keywords: West Virginia; cardiomyopathy; diabetes; serum biomarkers.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26941576 PMCID: PMC4773280 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.14141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1Mitral inflow velocities representing normal physiology as well as the spectrum of diastolic dysfunction. A: Normal. B: Impaired Relaxation. C: Grade II diastolic dysfunction (pseudonormalization). D: Restrictive
Figure 2Assay of serum concentrations of (A) TNFα, (B) IL-6 and (C) Isoprostane in Control, DM, DD and DM+DD patient groups. Values represent means ± SEM. * p<0.05 vs CTR; # p<0.05 vs DM, + p<0.05 vs DD.
Figure 3Serum levels of (A) Leptin, (B) Adiponectin and (C) Bilirubin in Control, DM, DD and DM+DD patient groups determined by ELISA. Values represent means ± SEM. * p<0.05 vs CTR; # p<0.05 vs DM, + p<0.05 vs DD.
Figure 4Assay of serum concentrations of (A) TGF-β and (B) IGFBP7 in Control, DM, DD and DM+DD patient groups. Values represent means ± SEM. * p<0.05 vs CTR; # p<0.05 vs DM, + p<0.05 vs DD.
Figure 5Schematic depicting the progression from diabetes to DCM and the role of biomarkers to detect early stage DCM and attenuate disease progression.
Demographic Profile
| Groups | Control | Diastolic dysfunction (DD) | Diabetes mellitus (DM) | Diabetes mellitus with diastolic dysfunction (DM+DD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs.) | 41.67±11.79 | 44.27±8.31 | 48±11.78 | 45.69±8.42 |
| Sex (M/F) | 43%/57% | 50%/50% | 52%/48% | 57%/43% |
Patient Clinical Profile.
| BMI | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) | Glucose (mg/dL) | HbA1C (mg/dL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 23.89 (±1.01) | 61.12 (±11.02) | 67.60 (±3.96) | 91.50 (±4.50) | 5.20 (±0.11) |
| DM | 39.79* (±1.82) | 85.72 (±8.62) | 43.60* (±2.04) | 186.28* (±3.97) | 8.04* (±0.12) |
| DD | 31.42# (±2.70) | 92.16 (±8.10) | 44.42* (±3.85) | 107.23# (±24.14) | 5.72# (±0.50) |
| DM+DD | 39.44* (±2.68) | 113.05* (±9.39) | 39.50* (±1.97) | 172.9* (±13.66) | 7.36*+ (±0.29) |
Values represent means ± SEM. * p<0.05 vs Control; # p<0.05 vs DM; + p<0.05 vs DD.