Literature DB >> 26941176

The implications of non-invasive prenatal testing failures: a review of an under-discussed phenomenon.

Yuval Yaron1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA in maternal blood is a relatively new screening modality for the common trisomies of chromosomes 21, 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies. For some patients, however, results are not reported because of laboratory technical issues such as low fetal fraction and sequencing failures. In this review, the clinical implications of NIPT test failures are discussed.
METHODS: A Medline search was performed for all studies on NIPT that include >1000 samples. The failure rates were assessed by technology.
RESULTS: Methods based on massive parallel sequencing have been found to have the lowest failure rate (1.58%), while tests based on single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis have the highest failure rate (6.39%).
CONCLUSIONS: Recent publications suggest that patients who receive a 'no call' result are at increased risk of aneuploidy. Some professional societies have therefore recommended that these patients undergo genetic counseling and be offered invasive diagnostic testing. NIPT technology that has a high failure rate may increase the false positive rates, decrease the positive predictive value, and increase the procedure-related pregnancy loss.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26941176     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  20 in total

1.  Repeated failed non-invasive prenatal testing in a woman with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid syndrome: lessons learnt.

Authors:  C Y Y Hui; W C Tan; E L Tan; L K Tan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-05

Review 2.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 3.  Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Dallas Reed; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The impact of maternal autoimmune disease on cell-free DNA test characteristics.

Authors:  Hayley J MacKinnon; Teodora R Kolarova; Ronit Katz; Jaclynne M Hedge; Elena Vinopal; Christina M Lockwood; Raj Shree; Shani Delaney
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-08-18

5.  Chromosomal phase improves aneuploidy detection in non-invasive prenatal testing at low fetal DNA fractions.

Authors:  Giulio Genovese; Curtis J Mello; Po-Ru Loh; Robert E Handsaker; Seva Kashin; Christopher W Whelan; Lucy A Bayer-Zwirello; Steven A McCarroll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Stephanie Guseh; Louise Wilkins-Haug; Anjali Kaimal; Lisa Dunn-Albanese; Sophie Adams; Sarah Carroll; Marie Discenza; Lori Dobson; Marney Brillinger; Judith Foster; Samantha Gbur; Hayley Green; Nancy Herrig; Chelsea Mandigo; Michelle Pacione; Penelope Roberts; Abigail Sassaman; Kathleen Steinberg; Courtney Studwell; Kathryn J Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Overall evaluation of the clinical value of prenatal screening for fetal-free DNA in maternal blood.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Bei-Yi Lu; Bin Zhang; Xiao-Qing Zhang; Ying-Ping Chen; Qin Zhou; Jian Jiang; Hui-Yan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Scheffer; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Ellis C Becking; Marjan M Weiss; Caroline J Bax; Dick Oepkes; Erik A Sistermans; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.242

9.  Response to "Noninvasive prenatal screening at low fetal fraction: comparing whole-genome sequencing and single-nucleotide polymorphism methods".

Authors:  Dale Muzzey; Carrie Haverty; Eric A Evans; James D Goldberg
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Offering non-invasive prenatal testing as part of routine clinical service. Can high levels of informed choice be maintained?

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.