Daniele Ouellet1,2, Nastya Kassir3, Joannellyn Chiu4,5, Mohamad-Samer Mouksassi3, Cathrine Leonowens4,6, Donna Cox7,8, Douglas J DeMarini7, Olivia Gardner4,9, Wendy Crist9,7, Kiran Patel9,7. 1. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. douelle2@its.jnj.com. 2. Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA. douelle2@its.jnj.com. 3. Certara Strategic Consulting, Montreal, Canada. 4. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 5. Inncelerex,, Jersey City, NJ, USA. 6. Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA. 8. Teva Pharmaceuticals, Frazer, PA, USA. 9. Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of oral trametinib, a first in class MEK inhibitor, identify covariates, and describe the relationship between exposure and clinical effects in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Trametinib concentrations obtained in three clinical studies were included in the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Trametinib 2 mg once daily was administered in the Phase 2 and 3 studies. The impact of exposure [trough (C min) or average concentration] on response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) was examined. RESULTS:Plasma concentrations (n = 3120) obtained in 493 patients were described using a two-compartment model. Trametinib oral clearance was lower in women relative to men (1.26-fold) and increased with body weight. There was no significant effect of age, mild or moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment on oral clearance. Between-subject variability was low (24 %). The number of responders was consistent across median exposure range, although tended to be lower at trough concentration <10 ng/mL. Disease stage was found to be a significant predictor of response with a lower response rate in patients with disease stage of M1c. Lactate dehydrogenase was significant in the analysis of PFS. Patients with observed C min above the median had longer PFS than those below median based on Phase 2 study (median 10.6 ng/mL), while the effect of exposure was not statistically significant in the Phase 3 study (median 13.6 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: No dosage adjustments are required with any of the covariates tested. Clinical efficacy was associated with trametinib trough concentrations greater than 10 ng/mL.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of oral trametinib, a first in class MEK inhibitor, identify covariates, and describe the relationship between exposure and clinical effects in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Trametinib concentrations obtained in three clinical studies were included in the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Trametinib 2 mg once daily was administered in the Phase 2 and 3 studies. The impact of exposure [trough (C min) or average concentration] on response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) was examined. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations (n = 3120) obtained in 493 patients were described using a two-compartment model. Trametinib oral clearance was lower in women relative to men (1.26-fold) and increased with body weight. There was no significant effect of age, mild or moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment on oral clearance. Between-subject variability was low (24 %). The number of responders was consistent across median exposure range, although tended to be lower at trough concentration <10 ng/mL. Disease stage was found to be a significant predictor of response with a lower response rate in patients with disease stage of M1c. Lactate dehydrogenase was significant in the analysis of PFS. Patients with observed C min above the median had longer PFS than those below median based on Phase 2 study (median 10.6 ng/mL), while the effect of exposure was not statistically significant in the Phase 3 study (median 13.6 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: No dosage adjustments are required with any of the covariates tested. Clinical efficacy was associated with trametinib trough concentrations greater than 10 ng/mL.
Authors: Stefanie L Groenland; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Jacobine G C van Doremalen; Julie M Janssen; Hilde Rosing; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: René J Boosman; Jacobus A Burgers; Egbert F Smit; Neeltje Steeghs; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Rob Ter Heine Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema; Stefanie L Groenland; Remy B Verheijen; Markus Joerger; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alex Sparreboom; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H Beumer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lauriane Goldwirt; B Louveau; C Lebbé; S Mourah; B Baroudjian; C Allayous; F Jouenne; L Da Meda; L-T Vu; H Sauvageon; F Herms; J Delyon Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Remy B Verheijen; Huixin Yu; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Elizabeth Stewart; Justina McEvoy; Hong Wang; Xiang Chen; Victoria Honnell; Monica Ocarz; Brittney Gordon; Jason Dapper; Kaley Blankenship; Yanling Yang; Yuxin Li; Timothy I Shaw; Ji-Hoon Cho; Xusheng Wang; Beisi Xu; Pankaj Gupta; Yiping Fan; Yu Liu; Michael Rusch; Lyra Griffiths; Jongrye Jeon; Burgess B Freeman; Michael R Clay; Alberto Pappo; John Easton; Sheila Shurtleff; Anang Shelat; Xin Zhou; Kristy Boggs; Heather Mulder; Donald Yergeau; Armita Bahrami; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Jinghui Zhang; Junmin Peng; James R Downing; Michael A Dyer Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 31.743