Literature DB >> 26940932

QRS Duration or QRS Morphology: What Really Matters in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

Jeanne E Poole1, Jagmeet P Singh2, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green3.   

Abstract

The beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have been well established in large, randomized trials. Despite the documented success of this treatment strategy, a significant proportion of patients with heart failure do not achieve the desired response. The aim of this review was to delineate factors contributing to a successful CRT response, emphasizing the interrelated roles of QRS morphology and QRS interval duration. More data are available on QRS duration, as this factor has been used as an enrollment criterion in clinical trials. Response to CRT seems to increase as the QRS duration becomes longer, with greatest benefit in QRS duration ≥150 ms. Recent data have placed more emphasis on QRS morphology, demonstrating variability in clinical response between patients with left bundle branch block, non-left bundle branch block, and right bundle branch block morphology. Notably, myocardial scarring and cardiac dimensions, among other variables, may alter heterogeneity in ventricular activation. Understanding the electrophysiological underpinnings of the QRS complex has become important not only to predict response but also to facilitate the patient-specific delivery of resynchronization therapy.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bundle branch block; implantable defibrillator; pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940932     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  17 in total

1.  Non-invasively quantified changes in left ventricular activation predict outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Steen Møller Hansen; Christoffer Polcwiartek; Peter L Sørensen; Zak Loring; Joanne Sutter; Peter Søgaard; Joseph Kisslo; Claus Graff; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-10-08

2.  Detection of interventricular dyssynchrony: An evolution of the phase analysis technique.

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; Diwakar Jain
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  A Review of Image-guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.

Authors:  Haipeng Tang; Shaojie Tang; Weihua Zhou
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  Determinants of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  John D Allison; Yitschak Biton; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-05-15

5.  Prognostic Value of QRS Duration among Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Heart Failure: Data from the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) Registry.

Authors:  Jung Ae Hong; Min-Seok Kim; Hanbit Park; Sang Eun Lee; Hae-Young Lee; Hyun-Jai Cho; Jin Oh Choi; Eun-Seok Jeon; Kyung-Kuk Hwang; Shung Chull Chae; Sang Hong Baek; Seok-Min Kang; Dong-Ju Choi; Byung-Su Yoo; Kye Hun Kim; Myeong-Chan Cho; Jae-Joong Kim; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-03-16

6.  Determinants of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Hans Henrik Odland; Torbjørn Holm; Lars Ove Gammelsrud; Richard Cornelussen; Erik Kongsgaard
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-05

Review 7.  Comparative efficacy of image-guided techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Hai Xu; Shameer Raaj Avishkar Hassea; Zhiyong Qian; Yao Wang; Xinwei Zhang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Assessment with Electromechanical Activation Mapping within 24 Hours of Device Implantation: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lea Melki; Daniel Y Wang; Christopher S Grubb; Rachel Weber; Angelo Biviano; Elaine Y Wan; Hasan Garan; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 7.722

9.  Relationship of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony in Patients Submitted to CRT With LV Lead Implantation Guided by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Spect.

Authors:  Erivelton Alessandro do Nascimento; Christiane Cigagna Wiefels Reis; Fernanda Baptista Ribeiro; Christiane Rodrigues Alves; Eduardo Nani Silva; Mario Luiz Ribeiro; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Correlation between Myocardial Velocity Measured using Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Left Ventricular Lead-Implanted Segment and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Yang; Fei Yu; Kang-Yu Chen; Hao Su; Qi Wang; Zhi-Quan Liu; Kai Hu; Jian Xu; Ji Yan
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.