Literature DB >> 26940608

First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--Chapter 2a: source pigs--preventing xenozoonoses.

Thomas Spizzo1, Joachim Denner2, Lawrence Gazda3, Michael Martin1, Divya Nathu4, Linda Scobie5, Yasuhiro Takeuchi6.   

Abstract

Chapter 2 of the original consensus statement published in 2009 by IXA represents an excellent basis for the production of safe donor pigs and pig-derived materials for porcine islet xenotransplantation. It was intended that the consensus statement was to be reviewed at interval to remain relevant. Indeed, many of the original salient points remain relevant today, especially when porcine islet xenotransplantation is performed in conjunction with immunosuppressants. However, progress in the field including demonstrated safe clinical porcine xenograft studies, increased understanding of risks including those posed by PERV, and advancement of diagnostic capabilities now allow for further consideration. Agents of known and unknown pathogenic significance continue to be identified and should be considered on a geographic, risk-based, dynamic, and product-specific basis, where appropriate using validated, advanced diagnostic techniques. PERV risk can be sufficiently reduced via multicomponent profiling including subtype expression levels in combination with infectivity assays. Barrier facilities built and operated against the AAALAC Ag Guide or suitable alternative criteria should be considered for source animal production as long as cGMPs and SOPs are followed. Bovine material-free feed for source animals should be considered appropriate instead of mammalian free materials to sufficiently reduce TSE risks. Finally, the sponsor retention period for archival samples of donor materials was deemed sufficient until the death of the recipient if conclusively determined to be of unrelated and non-infectious cause or for a reasonable period, that is, five to 10 yrs. In summary, the safe and economical production of suitable pigs and porcine islet xenograft materials, under appropriate guidance and regulatory control, is believed to be a viable means of addressing the unmet need for clinical islet replacement materials.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  closed herd; designated pathogen-free status; infectious disease; islet xenotransplantation; porcine endogenous retrovirus; porcine islet product; regulatory guidance; source pigs; type 1 diabetes; xenozoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940608     DOI: 10.1111/xen.12223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pig-to-Primate Islet Xenotransplantation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Zhengzhao Liu; Wenbao Hu; Tian He; Yifan Dai; Hidetaka Hara; Rita Bottino; David K C Cooper; Zhiming Cai; Lisha Mou
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-31

Review 3.  Xenotransplantation: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Ping Li; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.640

4.  Xenoantigen Deletion and Chemical Immunosuppression Can Prolong Renal Xenograft Survival.

Authors:  Andrew B Adams; Steven C Kim; Gregory R Martens; Joseph M Ladowski; Jose L Estrada; Luz M Reyes; Cindy Breeden; Allison Stephenson; Devin E Eckhoff; Matt Tector; Alfred Joseph Tector
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Gene Editing, Gene Therapy, and Cell Xenotransplantation: Cell Transplantation Across Species.

Authors:  Nizar I Mourad; Pierre Gianello
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 6.  Xenotransplantation - A special case of One Health.

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Intravesical Administration of Xenogeneic Porcine Urothelial Cells Attenuates Cyclophosphamide-Induced Cystitis in Mice.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Huang; Chi-Cheng Chen; Yi-Tung Tsai; Chun-Chie Wu; Chih-Rong Shyr
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  A comprehensive microbiological safety approach for agarose encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence S Gazda; James Collins; Archie Lovatt; Robert W Holdcraft; Merribeth J Morin; Daniel Galbraith; Melanie Graham; Melissa A Laramore; Christine Maclean; John Black; Euan W Milne; Douglas G Marthaler; Horatiu V Vinerean; Michelle M Michalak; Deborah Hoffer; Steven Richter; Richard D Hall; Barry H Smith
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.907

9.  Pathogen elimination and prevention within a regulated, Designated Pathogen Free, closed pig herd for long-term breeding and production of xenotransplantation materials.

Authors:  Jeske Noordergraaf; Adrienne Schucker; Mike Martin; Henk-Jan Schuurman; Brianne Ordway; Kevin Cooley; Marie Sheffler; Kara Theis; Chasa Armstrong; Laura Klein; Doug Hansen; Megan Olson; Lisa Schlechter; Tom Spizzo
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.907

10.  Combination of novel intravesical xenogeneic urothelial cell immunotherapy and chemotherapy enhances anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical murine bladder tumor models.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Huang; Chun-Chie Wu; Chih-Rong Shyr
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.