| Literature DB >> 26938216 |
Francisco Villamarín1,2,3, William E Magnusson2, Timothy D Jardine4, Dominic Valdez1, Ryan Woods1, Stuart E Bunn1.
Abstract
Although considerable knowledge has been gathered regarding the role of fish in cycling and translocation of nutrients across ecosystem boundaries, little information is available on how the energy obtained from different ecosystems is temporally allocated in fish bodies. Although in theory, limitations on energy budgets promote the existence of a trade-off between energy allocated to reproduction and somatic growth, this trade-off has rarely been found under natural conditions. Combining information on RNA:DEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26938216 PMCID: PMC4777362 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study area.
Location of mullet sampling sites during dry and wet seasons (black and white dots, respectively) in the Alligator Rivers region—Northern Territory, Australia. Yellow triangles represent locations where primary sources were collected.
Fig 2Adult individual of Liza alata.
During the wet season, individuals of this species possess large mesenteric fat bodies (blue arrow) representing up to one third of the body volume.
Fig 3Relationships between body condition, reproductive investment and lipid content in somatic tissues.
Regression residuals of standard length and body mass were used as surrogates of body condition (X axis). The Y axis represents RNA:DNA ratios in gonads, a proxy of reproductive investment (black circles). The Z axis represents C/N ratios, a proxy of lipid content in muscle tissue (blue squares). Individuals from dry and wet seasons are represented by solid and open symbols, respectively.
Fig 4Somatic and reproductive growth.
Growth of tissues is indicated by RNA:DNA ratios in relation to the flooding cycle (mean monthly water level data at the South Alligator River Data Warehouse, black line). Developed eggs, gonads and muscle tissues are represented by red, blue and green dots, respectively.
RNA:DNA values of Liza alata tissues.
| Dry | Wet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | Mean (n) | ± SD | Mean (n) | ± SD |
| EGGS | 10.83 (4) | 1.92 | - | - |
| GONAD | 27.54 (12) | 6.39 | 14.00 (12) | 7.83 |
| MUSCLE | 7.61 (19) | 2.11 | 6.22 (14) | 1.27 |
Means and standard deviations (± SD) of RNA:DNA values from different tissues during dry and wet seasons.
Stable isotopes of C and N of L. alata and its primary sources.
| Dry | Wet | F | p | Dry | Wet | F | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -29.02 (±1.81) | -29.83 (±2.85) | 1.08 | 0.304 | 7.11 (±0.77) | 6.91 (±0.99) | 0.5 | 0.484 | |
| -28.44 (±2.03) | -29.32 (±2.28) | 1.33 | 0.258 | 5.45 (±0.77) | 5.82 (±1.06) | 1.24 | 0.274 | |
| -28.68 (±2.35) | -30.25 (±2.80) | 3.46 | 6.50 (±1.04) | 6.45 (±0.71) | 0.03 | 0.854 | ||
| Detritus | -31.26 (±0.66) | -30.28 (±3.37) | 1.06 | 0.322 | 1.39 (±1.31) | 3.71 (±2.53) | 4.39 | |
| Filam. algae | -28.47 (±5.15) | -35.69 (±1.33) | 3.71 | 2.95 (±2.20) | 2.4 (±2.74) | 0.11 | 0.746 | |
| Biofilm | -27.03 (±2.97) | -26.19 (±3.46) | 1.37 | 0.244 | 4.33 (±2.97) | 3.71 (±2.0) | 0.61 | 0.436 |
Mean and Standard deviation (±SD) values of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotopes from mullet tissues (M = muscle, G = gonad, L = liver) and their main primary sources available during dry and wet seasons. F and p values correspond to results from a One-Way ANOVA testing differences on δ13C and δ15N between seasons.
Fig 5Relationships between δ15N values in somatic and reproductive tissues of Liza alata.
The dashed line represents the 1:1 expected relationship. The solid line represents the least-squares linear regressions of: A) liver vs. gonads, B) liver vs. muscle and, C) muscle vs. gonads. Individuals from dry and wet seasons are represented by solid and open symbols, respectively.