Literature DB >> 26937802

Prediction of Low versus High Recurrence Scores in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Lymph Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer on the Basis of Radiologic-Pathologic Features: Comparison with Oncotype DX Test Recurrence Scores.

Vandana Dialani1, Shantanu Gaur1, Tejas S Mehta1, Shambhavi Venkataraman1, Valerie Fein-Zachary1, Jordana Phillips1, Alexander Brook1, Priscilla J Slanetz1.   

Abstract

Purpose To review mammographic, ultrasonographic (US), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features and pathologic characteristics of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer and to determine the relationship of these characteristics to Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Redwood City, Calif) test recurrence scores (ODRS) for breast cancer recurrence. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved retrospective study was performed in a single large academic medical center. The study population included patients with ER-positive, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer who underwent genomic testing from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2013. Imaging features of the tumor were classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon by breast imagers who were blinded to the ODRS. Mammography was performed in 86% of patients, US was performed in 84%, and MR imaging was performed in 33%, including morphologic and kinetic evaluation. Images from each imaging modality were evaluated. Each imaging finding, progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and tumor grade were then individually correlated with ODRS. Analysis of variance was used to determine differences for each imaging feature. Regression analysis was used to calculate prediction of recurrence on the basis of imaging features combined with histopathologic features. Results The 319 patients had a mean age ± standard deviation of 55 years ± 8.7 (range, 31-82 years). Imaging features with a positive correlation with ODRS included a well-circumscribed oval mass (P = .024) at mammography, vascularity (P = .047) and posterior enhancement (P = .004) at US, and lobulated mass (P = .002) at MR imaging. Recurrence scores were predicted by using these features in combination with PR and HER2 status and tumor grade by using the threshold of more than 30 as a high recurrence score. With a regression tree, there was correlation (r = 0.79) with 89% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Conclusion On the basis of preliminary data, information obtained routinely for breast cancer diagnosis can reliably be used to predict the ODRS with high sensitivity and specificity. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26937802     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MRI characteristics associated with prognostic pathological factors and recurrence risk in invasive ER+/HER2- breast cancers.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Vicky T Nguyen; Habib Rahbar; Daniel S Hippe; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Mara H Rendi; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  The 21-gene recurrence score in special histologic subtypes of breast cancer with favorable prognosis.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Clifford Hudis; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.

Authors:  Sunitha B Thakur; Manuela Durando; Soledad Milans; Gene Y Cho; Lucas Gennaro; Elizabeth J Sutton; Dilip Giri; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Association of machine learning ultrasound radiomics and disease outcome in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Xiaokang Li; Ying Yuan; Yiwei Tong; Siyi Zhu; Renhong Huang; Kunwei Shen; Yi Guo; Yuanyuan Wang; Xiaosong Chen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Mammography-based radiomics for predicting the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ning Mao; Ping Yin; Haicheng Zhang; Kun Zhang; Xicheng Song; Dong Xing; Tongpeng Chu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Authors:  Almir Bitencourt; Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.531

7.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: association between intratumoral heterogeneity and recurrence risk.

Authors:  Jin You Kim; Jin Joo Kim; Lee Hwangbo; Ji Won Lee; Nam Kyung Lee; Kyung Jin Nam; Ki Seok Choo; Taewoo Kang; Heeseung Park; Yohan Son; Robert Grimm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  [Multimodal, multiparametric and genetic breast imaging].

Authors:  Roberto LoGullo; Joao Horvat; Jeffrey Reiner; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Molecular subtypes and imaging phenotypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nariya Cho
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-07-21

10.  Prediction of low-risk breast cancer using quantitative DCE-MRI and its pathological basis.

Authors:  Tingting Xu; Lin Zhang; Hong Xu; Sifeng Kang; Yali Xu; Xiaoyu Luo; Ting Hua; Guangyu Tang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.