Literature DB >> 26936979

Gait parameter control timing with dynamic manual contact or visual cues.

Ely Rabin1, Peter Shi2, William Werner3.   

Abstract

We investigated the timing of gait parameter changes (stride length, peak toe velocity, and double-, single-support, and complete step duration) to control gait speed. Eleven healthy participants adjusted their gait speed on a treadmill to maintain a constant distance between them and a fore-aft oscillating cue (a place on a conveyor belt surface). The experimental design balanced conditions of cue modality (vision: eyes-open; manual contact: eyes-closed while touching the cue); treadmill speed (0.2, 0.4, 0.85, and 1.3 m/s); and cue motion (none, ±10 cm at 0.09, 0.11, and 0.18 Hz). Correlation analyses revealed a number of temporal relationships between gait parameters and cue speed. The results suggest that neural control ranged from feedforward to feedback. Specifically, step length preceded cue velocity during double-support duration suggesting anticipatory control. Peak toe velocity nearly coincided with its most-correlated cue velocity during single-support duration. The toe-off concluding step and double-support durations followed their most-correlated cue velocity, suggesting feedback control. Cue-tracking accuracy and cue velocity correlations with timing parameters were higher with the manual contact cue than visual cue. The cue/gait timing relationships generalized across cue modalities, albeit with greater delays of step-cycle events relative to manual contact cue velocity. We conclude that individual kinematic parameters of gait are controlled to achieve a desired velocity at different specific times during the gait cycle. The overall timing pattern of instantaneous cue velocities associated with different gait parameters is conserved across cues that afford different performance accuracies. This timing pattern may be temporally shifted to optimize control. Different cue/gait parameter latencies in our nonadaptation paradigm provide general-case evidence of the independent control of gait parameters previously demonstrated in gait adaptation paradigms.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback control; feedforward control; gait; haptics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936979      PMCID: PMC4922609          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00670.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  The many roles of vision during walking.

Authors:  David Logan; Tim Kiemel; Nadia Dominici; Germana Cappellini; Yuri Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prism adaptation and generalization during visually guided locomotor tasks.

Authors:  M Scott Alexander; Brent W G Flodin; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Stride length regulation in Parkinson's disease. Normalization strategies and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  M E Morris; R Iansek; T A Matyas; J J Summers
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Locomotor adaptation to resistance during treadmill training transfers to overground walking in human SCI.

Authors:  Sheng-Che Yen; Brian D Schmit; Jill M Landry; Heidi Roth; Ming Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Evidence for limb-independent control of locomotor trajectory.

Authors:  Marie E McNeely; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Timing-specific transfer of adapted muscle activity after walking in an elastic force field.

Authors:  Andreanne Blanchette; Laurent J Bouyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Reduced effects of tendon vibration with increased task demand during active, cyclical ankle movements.

Authors:  Lisa M Floyd; Taylor C Holmes; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Predictive control of ankle stiffness at heel contact is a key element of locomotor adaptation during split-belt treadmill walking in humans.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ogawa; Noritaka Kawashima; Toru Ogata; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The role of haptic cues from rough and slippery surfaces in human postural control.

Authors:  J J Jeka; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sleep deprivation affects gait control.

Authors:  Guilherme S Umemura; João Pedro Pinho; Jacques Duysens; Hermano Igo Krebs; Arturo Forner-Cordero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.