Literature DB >> 26936377

Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review of fracture patterns.

S A Steenen1, A G Becking2.   

Abstract

An unfavourable and unanticipated pattern of the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy is generally referred to as a 'bad split'. Few restorative techniques to manage the situation have been described. In this article, a classification of reported bad split pattern types is proposed and appropriate salvage procedures to manage the different types of undesired fracture are presented. A systematic review was undertaken, yielding a total of 33 studies published between 1971 and 2015. These reported a total of 458 cases of bad splits among 19,527 sagittal ramus osteotomies in 10,271 patients. The total reported incidence of bad split was 2.3% of sagittal splits. The most frequently encountered were buccal plate fractures of the proximal segment (types 1A-F) and lingual fractures of the distal segment (types 2A and 2B). Coronoid fractures (type 3) and condylar neck fractures (type 4) have seldom been reported. The various types of bad split may require different salvage approaches.
Copyright © 2016 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bad split; bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; classification; intraoperative complications; management; mandibular fracture; orthognathic surgery; sagittal ramus osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936377     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

1.  Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in the Shortest Buccal Bone Marrow Distances of the Mandible on the Coronal Plane.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Han-Jen Hsu; Ping-Ho Chen; Shih-Wei Liang; I-Ling Lin; Kun-Jung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Virtual Reality and Three-Dimensional Printed Models Improve the Morphological Understanding in Learning Mandibular Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Henglei Zhang; Yu He; Ying Chen; Jianfeng Liu; Qi Jin; Shixing Xu; Xi Fu; Jia Qiao; Bing Yu; Feng Niu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-22

3.  Differences in the Buccal Bone Marrow Distance of ≤0.8 mm in the Mandible of Patients Undergoing Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy among the Different Skeletal Patterns: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Shih-Wei Liang; Szu-Ting Chou; Shih-Chieh Chen; Chin-Yun Pan; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Dal Pont vs Hunsuck: Which Technique Can Lead to a Lower Incidence of Bad Split during Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farhad Zeynalzadeh; Zahra Shooshtari; Majid Eshghpour; Seied Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 5.  Complications associated with orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.