| Literature DB >> 26936108 |
Hendrik Wilking1, Michael Thamm2, Klaus Stark1, Toni Aebischer3, Frank Seeber3.
Abstract
Representative data on the extent of endemicity, burden, and risk of human toxoplasmosis are scarce. We assessed the prevalence and determinants of seropositivity of Toxoplasma gondii among adult participants of a nationwide representative cross-sectional survey in Germany. Sera collected from a representative cohort of adults (age 18-79; n = 6,663) in Germany were tested for anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies. Interview-derived data were used to evaluate associated factors. Multivariable logistic regression was applied using sampling weights and accounting for survey design cluster effects. Seroprevalence increased from 20% (95%-CI:17-23%) in the 18-29 age group to 77% (95%-CI:73-81%) in the 70-79 age group. Male gender, keeping cats and BMI ≥30 were independent risk factors for seropositivity, while being vegetarian and high socio-economic status were negatively associated. Based on these data, we estimate 1.1% of adults and 1.3% of women aged 18-49 to seroconvert each year. This implies 6,393 seroconversions annually during pregnancies. We conclude that T. gondii infection in Germany is highly prevalent and that eating habits (consuming raw meat) appear to be of high epidemiological relevance. High numbers of seroconversions during pregnancies pose substantial risks for unborn children. Efforts to raise awareness of toxoplasmosis in public health programs targeting to T. gondii transmission control are therefore strongly advocated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26936108 PMCID: PMC4776094 DOI: 10.1038/srep22551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Stratified seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against T. gondii detected by ELFA in adults aged 18 to 79 years and results of weighted logistic regression analysis of potential risk factors for seropositivity, 2008–2011.
| Characteristic (total no.) | n (pos) | Prevalence in % (95% CI) | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-Value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-Value | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Women (n = 3,443) | 1,864 | 48.85 (46.56–51.14) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Men (n = 3,121) | 1,738 | 49.31 (46.35–52.27) | 1.02 (0.90–1.15) | 0.767 | 1.76 (1.08–2.91) | 0.023 |
| Interaction term sex*age | – | – | – | – | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) | 0.024 |
| Age | ||||||
| Yearly | – | – | 1.05 (1.05–1.06) | <0.001 | 1.06 (1.05–1.06) | <0.001 |
| Age group (years) | ||||||
| 18–29 (n = 994) | 214 | 19.95 (17.10–23.13) | ref | ref | – | – |
| 30–39 (n = 790) | 301 | 35.46 (31.01–40.17) | 2.21 (1.70–2.85) | <0.001 | – | – |
| 40–49 (n = 1,212) | 628 | 48.10 (44.57–51.64) | 3.72 (3.00–4.60) | <0.001 | – | – |
| 50–59 (n = 1,298) | 796 | 57.97 (54.25–61.61) | 5.54 (4.37–7.01) | <0.001 | – | – |
| 60–69 (n = 1,267) | 903 | 69.48 (65.13–73.50) | 9.13 (7.01–11.89) | <0.001 | – | – |
| 70–79 (n = 1,003) | 760 | 76.82 (72.74–80.45) | 13.30 (10.20–17.34) | <0.001 | – | – |
| Residence (East-West) | ||||||
| West (n = 4,484) | 2,067 | 44.02 (42.10–45.96) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| East (n = 2,080) | 1,535 | 68.17 (64.13–71.95) | 2.72 (2.24–3.30) | <0.001 | 0.98 (0.56–1.71) | 0.936 |
| Interact term East*age | – | – | – | – | 1.03 (1.02–1.04) | <0.001 |
| Residence (north-south) | ||||||
| North (n = 1,683) | 1,029 | 53.90 49.94–57.81) | 1.46 (1.20–1.79) | <0.001 | 1.17 (0.93–1.46) | 0.177 |
| Middle (n = 2,879) | 1,650 | 50.04 (46.12–53.96) | 1.26 (1.02–1.53) | 0.026 | 0.98 (0.80–1.20) | 0.859 |
| South (n = 2,002) | 923 | 44.38 (41.23–47.58) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Population of municipality | ||||||
| <5,000 (n = 1,171) | 725 | 56.21 (49.89–62.35) | 1.67 (1.27–2.19) | <0.001 | 1.41 (1.11–1.79) | 0.005 |
| 5,000–<20,000 (n = 1,598) | 904 | 52.11 (47.50–56.69) | 1.41 (1.14–1.76) | 0.002 | 1.18 (0.97–1.44) | 0.100 |
| 20,000–<100,000 (n = 1,941) | 975 | 43.50 (40.35–46.71) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| >100,000 (n = 1,854) | 998 | 48.72 (44.68–52.79) | 1.23 (1.01–1.51) | 0.043 | 1.17 (0.96–1.43) | 0.118 |
| Pet in household | ||||||
| No pet (n = 4,360) | 2,400 | 49.00 (46.64–51.36) | ref | ref | – | – |
| Any pet (n = 2,045) | 1,099 | 48.46 (45.38–51.55) | 0.98 (0.87–1.10) | 0.718 | – | – |
| Dog | ||||||
| No (n = 5,588) | 3,070 | 49.19 (46.93–51.46) | ref | ref | – | – |
| Yes (n = 806) | 424 | 46.66 (41.94–51.45) | 0.90 (0.75–1.09) | 0.288 | – | – |
| Cat | ||||||
| No (n = 5,383) | 2,936 | 48.37 (45.99–50.76) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes (n = 1,011) | 558 | 51.46 (47.70–55.21) | 1.13 (0.97–1.32) | 0.127 | 1.27 (1.06–1.51) | 0.009 |
| Other animals | ||||||
| No (n = 5,679) | 3,126 | 49.29 (47.04–51.54) | ref | ref | – | – |
| Yes (n = 715) | 368 | 45.73 (40.62–50.93) | 0.87 (0.71–1.06) | 0.168 | – | – |
| Eating vegetarian | ||||||
| No (n = 6,148) | 3,413 | 49.74 (47.54–51.93) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes (n = 248) | 94 | 35.77 (28.21–44.11) | 0.56 (0.40–0.80 | 0.002 | 0.62 (0.42–0.99) | 0.048 |
| Body mass index (BMI) | ||||||
| Underweight (BMI < 18.5) (n = 86) | 22 | 23.95 (14.44–37.02) | 0.50 (0.27–0.94) | 0.031 | 0.66 (0.34–1.28) | 0.212 |
| Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25) (n = 2,430) | 1,063 | 38.44 (35.83–41.12) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30) (n = 2,457) | 1,470 | 54.94 (52.08–57.76) | 1.95 (1.70–2.24) | <0.001 | 1.23 (1.03–1.47) | 0.024 |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) (n = 1,552) | 1,023 | 58.99 (55.53–62.39) | 2.35 (2.15–2.55) | <0.001 | 1.28 (1.01–1.55) | 0.048 |
| Diabetes (12 month prevalence) | ||||||
| No (n = 6,072) | 3,253 | 47.92 (45.76–50.10) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes (n = 432) | 313 | 67.12 (60.87–72.82) | 2.22 (1.70–2.90) | <0.001 | 0.82 (0.61–1.10) | 0.181 |
| Socio-economic status | ||||||
| Low (n = 1,034) | 617 | 54.93 (50.97–58.83) | 1.23 (1.03–1.47) | 0.024 | 1.20 (0.95–1.52) | 0.132 |
| Middle (n = 3,933) | 2,217 | 49.77 (47.13–52.43) | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| High (n = 1,553) | 745 | 41.42 (38.09–44.83) | 0.71 (0.61–0.83) | <0.001 | 0.72 (0.60–0.85) | <0.001 |
| Total (n = 6,564) | 3,602 | 49.08 (46.92–51.23) | – | – | – | – |
aunweighted.
bEastern states: Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Thuringia. Western states: Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Bremen, Hamburg, Hesse, Lower Saxony, Northrhine-Westfalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland, Schleswig-Holstein.
cNorthern states: Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, Bremen, Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. Middle states: Nordrhine-Westfalia, Hesse, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Thuringia. Southern states: Rhineland-Palatinate, Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Saarland.
dat day of interview.
eSocio-economic status is measured using a score composed of income, education and professional status.
Figure 1Estimated T. gondii seroprevalence, by age (18–79 years) and gender, in Germany, 2008–2011.
Figure 2Estimated T. gondii seroprevalence, by geographical origin (East-West) and gender, in Germany, 2008–2011.
Berlin is considered as East.
Annual incidence of seroconversions of IgG antibodies against T. gondii stratified by sex and age groups.
| Age group | Annual incidence in 100,000 persons | 95% confidence interval |
|---|---|---|
| Women | ||
| 18–79 years | 1,189 | 1,077–1,301 |
| 18–49 years | 1,325 | 1,007–1,642 |
| 50–79 years | 944 | 620–1,268 |
| Men | ||
| 18–79 years | 1,007 | 897–1,117 |
| 18–49 years | 1,436 | 1,186–1,686 |
| 50–79 years | 794 | 454–1,134 |
| Total | 1,099 | 1,016–1,181 |
Seroprevalence of T. gondii infection by age group in women of childbearing age.
| Age of the mother at child birth | Number of women in German population | Annual expected number of seroconversions | Number of births in Germany | Proportion of women giving birth (in %) | Proportion of seronegative women (in %) | Annual expected number of seroconversions among pregnancies (% of pregnancies at risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–19 | 1,985,672 | 26,310 | 16,459 | 0.83 | 90.8 | 159 (1.1) |
| 20–24 | 2,421,962 | 32,091 | 88,777 | 3.67 | 84.5 | 857 (1.1) |
| 25–29 | 2,447,109 | 32,424 | 191,010 | 7.81 | 78.1 | 1,843 (1.2) |
| 30–34 | 2,437,824 | 32,301 | 222,218 | 9.12 | 71.7 | 2,144 (1.3) |
| 35–39 | 2,359,922 | 31,269 | 115,634 | 4.90 | 65.4 | 1,116 (1.5) |
| 40–44 | 3,116,101 | 41,288 | 27,131 | 0.87 | 59.0 | 262 (1.6) |
| 45–49 | 3,490,840 | 46,254 | 1,256 | 0.04 | 52.6 | 12 (1.8) |
| Total | 18,259,430 | 241,937 | 662,485 | – | 74.1 | 6,393 (1.3) |
aEstimates for the 15–17 year-old were derived from the study data assuming constant increase as in the age group 18 to 25 years.
bGerman Federal statistical office, 2011.
cat an incidence of 1,325 in 100,000 inhabitants.
dinverse of prevalence, estimates from the regression model.
Stratified seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against T. gondii detected by ELFA in adults aged 18 to 79 years, and results of weighted logistic regression analysis of seropositivity on depression as an outcome, 2008–2011.
| Lifetime depression (total no.) | n (pos) | Prevalence (95% CI) | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-Value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | Odds ratio (95% CI) | Odds ratio (95% CI) | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |||
| No (n = 5,747) | 3,161 | 49.12 (46.90–51.34) | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes (n = 768) | 409 | 47.56 (43.05–52.11) | 0.94 (0.78–1.13) | 0.497 | 1.05 (0.84–1.19) | 0.365 | 0.84 (0.55–1.29) | 0.420 |
aunweighted, lifetime incidence of depression (self-reported) was assessed by asking the closed question “Have you ever been diagnosed with depression by a physician or a psychotherapist”?
badjusted for age, sex and interaction between both.
cadjusted for variables in multivariable model of Table 1.