Literature DB >> 17380472

Prenatal screening and diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: a review of safety issues and psychological consequences for women who undergo screening.

Babak Khoshnood1, Catherine De Vigan, François Goffinet, Valériane Leroy.   

Abstract

As part of the EUROTOXO initiative, this review focuses on the potential risks associated with prenatal testing for congenital toxoplasmosis. We first review the evidence on the risks of adverse events associated with amniocentesis, which is required for definitive diagnosis of toxoplasmosis infection in the fetus, and for which the most important risk is fetal loss. To date, there has been only one randomized trial to document risks associated with amniocentesis. This trial, which was conducted in 1986, reported a procedure-related rate of fetal loss of 1.0% (95% CI, 0.3-1.5). However, evidence from available controlled studies suggests that the pregnancy loss associated with mid-trimester amniocentesis may be lower. Potential psychological consequences of prenatal testing for congenital toxoplasmosis include parental anxiety due to false positive results and uncertainties related to prognosis of children with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Parental anxiety may be particularly important in screening strategies that include more frequent screenings, which may in turn entail substantial, and at times unnecessary, anxiety or other negative consequences for women and their families. These negative psychological outcomes should be balanced against the benefits of testing, which can allow women to make an informed choice regarding the pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17380472     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  9 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  Florence Robert-Gangneux; Marie-Laure Dardé
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Survey of obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States about toxoplasmosis: 2012 update.

Authors:  Stephanie M Davis; Britta L Anderson; Jay Schulkin; Katherine Jones; Jodi Vanden Eng; Jeffrey L Jones
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Role of Toxoplasma gondii IgG Avidity Testing in Discriminating between Acute and Chronic Toxoplasmosis in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Aref Teimouri; Sina Mohtasebi; Elham Kazemirad; Hossein Keshavarz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Persistent Low Toxoplasma IgG Avidity Is Common in Pregnancy: Experience from Antenatal Testing in Norway.

Authors:  Gry Findal; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Ellen K Holter; Tone Berge; Pål A Jenum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Management of suspected primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in Norway: twenty years of experience of amniocentesis in a low-prevalence population.

Authors:  Gry Findal; Anne Helbig; Guttorm Haugen; Pål A Jenum; Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Neglected parasitic infections in the United States: toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jones; Monica E Parise; Anthony E Fiore
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Prevalence, incidence estimations, and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in Germany: a representative, cross-sectional, serological study.

Authors:  Hendrik Wilking; Michael Thamm; Klaus Stark; Toni Aebischer; Frank Seeber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Estimates of Toxoplasmosis Incidence Based on Healthcare Claims Data, Germany, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Amrei Krings; Josephine Jacob; Frank Seeber; Uwe Pleyer; Jochen Walker; Klaus Stark; Hendrik Wilking
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Gestational toxoplasmosis in Paraná State, Brazil: prevalence of IgG antibodies and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Fabiana Maria Ruiz Lopes-Mori; Regina Mitsuka-Breganó; Laura Helena França de Barros Bittencourt; Renata Cristina Ferreira Dias; Daniela Dib Gonçalves; Jaqueline Dario Capobiango; Edna Maria Vissoci Reiche; Helena Kaminami Morimoto; Roberta Lemos Freire; Italmar Teodorico Navarro
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.257

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.