Literature DB >> 26935437

On the fragility of medical virtue in a neoliberal context: the case of commercial conflicts of interest in reproductive medicine.

Christopher Mayes1, Brette Blakely2, Ian Kerridge3, Paul Komesaroff4, Ian Olver5, Wendy Lipworth3.   

Abstract

Social, political, and economic environments play an active role in nurturing professional virtue. Yet, these environments can also lead to the erosion of virtue. As such, professional virtue is fragile and vulnerable to environmental shifts. While physicians are often considered to be among the most virtuous of professional groups, concern has also always existed about the impact of commercial arrangements on physicians' willingness and capacity to enact their professional virtues. This article examines the ways in which commercial arrangements have been negotiated to secure medical virtue from real or perceived threats of erosion. In particular, we focus on the concern surrounding conflicts of interest arising from commercial arrangements that have developed as a result of neoliberal economic and social policies. The deregulation of medical markets and privatization of services have produced new commercial relationships that are often misunderstood by patients, publics, and physicians themselves. 'Conflicts of interest' policies have been introduced in an attempt to safeguard ethical conduct and medical practice. However, a number of virtue ethicists have critiqued these policies as inadequate for securing virtue. We examine the ways in which commercial arrangements have been seen to impact upon medical virtue, both historically and in the context of modern medicine (using the example of fertility services in Australia). We then describe and critique current efforts to restore clinical virtue through both conflict of interest policies and through virtue ethics. Finally, we suggest some possible ways of addressing the corrosive effects of neoliberalism on medical virtue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commericalisation; Conflicts of interest; Fertility services; IVF; Professional ethics; Virtue ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26935437     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-016-9353-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  18 in total

1.  The neoliberal triad of anti-health reforms: government budget cutting, deregulation, and privatization.

Authors:  M Terris
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.222

2.  Regulation of financial conflicts of interest in medical practice and medical research: a damaging solution in search of a problem.

Authors:  Thomas P Stossel
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  It is time to move beyond a culture of unexamined assumptions, recrimination, and blame to one of systematic analysis and ethical dialogue.

Authors:  Paul Komesaroff; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  The ancient physician: craftsman or scientist?

Authors:  H F Horstmanshoff
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.088

5.  Medicine as a profession: a hypothetical imperative in clinical ethics.

Authors:  Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2015-02

6.  Corruption: medicine's dirty open secret.

Authors:  Anita Jain; Samiran Nundy; Kamran Abbasi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-06-25

7.  After 20 years, industry critics bury skeptics, despite empirical vacuum.

Authors:  D Barton; T Stossel; L Stell
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia.

Authors:  Georgina M Chambers; Peter J Illingworth; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Medicine as a 'liberal art' and the question of the physicians income.

Authors:  F Kudlien
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.088

10.  A humble task: restoring virtue in an age of conflicted interests.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Elena M Kraus; Anthony A Mikulec; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Erin Bakanas
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  1 in total

1.  Human vulnerability in medical contexts.

Authors:  Steve Matthews; Bernadette Tobin
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.