Literature DB >> 17259676

Regulation of financial conflicts of interest in medical practice and medical research: a damaging solution in search of a problem.

Thomas P Stossel1.   

Abstract

The free market, which includes most practicing physicians, publicly supported biomedical researchers, and private drug and device companies, has succeeded spectacularly in delivering new medical technologies to the public. Increased interactions between doctors (physicians and biomedical researchers), epitomized by the founding of the biotechnology revolution, have and can continue to accelerate this delivery. A powerful anti-commercial advocacy movement that has blossomed over the past 20 years threatens this momentum. This movement has succeeded in inverting reality by demonizing the market and by promoting distorted and damaging views of professionalism and of science. Most ominously, it has imposed onerous and counterproductive regulations on medical education and translational research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259676     DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Biol Med        ISSN: 0031-5982            Impact factor:   1.416


  8 in total

1.  Has the hunt for conflicts of interest gone too far? Yes.

Authors:  Thomas P Stossel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-01

2.  Rethinking medical professionalism: the role of information technology and practice innovations.

Authors:  David Mechanic
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Time to 'walk the walk' about industry ties to enhance health.

Authors:  Thomas P Stossel; Lance K Stell
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Do I have a conflict of interest? No.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Kenneth B Christopher; Anthony McLean
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  On the fragility of medical virtue in a neoliberal context: the case of commercial conflicts of interest in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Christopher Mayes; Brette Blakely; Ian Kerridge; Paul Komesaroff; Ian Olver; Wendy Lipworth
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-02

6.  Can access limits on sales representatives to physicians affect clinical prescription decisions? A study of recent events with diabetes and lipid drugs.

Authors:  George A Chressanthis; Pratap Khedkar; Nitin Jain; Prashant Poddar; Michael G Seiders
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.885

7.  Entrepreneurialism in the Translational Biologic Sciences: Why, How, and However.

Authors:  Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Leinwand; Eric N Olson
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2018-03-01

8.  The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists.

Authors:  Ralph M Barnes; Heather M Johnston; Noah MacKenzie; Stephanie J Tobin; Chelsea M Taglang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.