Literature DB >> 26935344

Impact of tumour size on prognosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 795 cases.

Yan Shibing1,2, Liu Liangren1, Wei Qiang1, Liao Hong3, Song Turun1, Lei Junhao1, Yang Lu1, Yuan Zhengyong2,4, Jiang Yonghao5, Fu Guangqing6, Li Yunxiang7, Cao Dehong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of tumour size on survival outcomes in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 795 patients treated with RNU for UTUC from seven centres were retrospectively analysed with focus on tumour size. Clinicopathological features and relevant prognostic factors were compared between patients with tumours ≤3.0 cm and those with tumours >3.0 cm in size. The primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 32 months, 313 (39.4%) patients died from UTUC, 321 (40.4%) developed cancer recurrence, and 359 (45.1%) died from all causes. Tumour size >3.0 cm was associated with unfavourable clinicopathlogical features. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that tumour size was significantly correlated with worse CSS, RFS and OS (all P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that tumour size was an independent predictor of CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.296; P < 0.001), RFS (HR 2.193; P < 0.001) and OS (HR 2.417; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size >3.0 cm was a significant predictor of CSS, RFS and OS after RNU for patients with UTUC. Further studies are warranted before tumour size is included in risk prediction tools.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prognosis; radical nephroureterectomy; survival analysis; tumour size; upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26935344     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  18 in total

1.  [Impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy and biopsy on radical nephroureterectomy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma].

Authors:  R Z Ma; H Z Xia; M Lu; Z Y Zhang; Q M Zhang; J Lu; G L Wang; L L Ma
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Increased cancer-specific mortality of very small size in carcinoembryonic antigen-elevated rectal cancer.

Authors:  Haiqiang Pan; Junhui Cui; Ke Cai; Yena Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Survival differences of patients with ureteral versus pelvicalyceal tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Krystian Kaczmarek; Artur Lemiński; Adam Gołąb; Marcin Słojewski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  The Influence of Tumor Size on Oncologic Outcomes for Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Xiaohong Su; Dong Fang; Xuesong Li; Gengyan Xiong; Lei Zhang; Han Hao; Yanqing Gong; Zheng Zhang; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Prognostic significance of urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation in upper urinary tract after radical nephroureterectomy without metastatic diseases: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chuan Qin; En-Li Liang; Zhi-Yong Du; Xiao-Yu Qiu; Gang Tang; Fei-Ran Chen; Bo Zhang; Da-Wei Tian; Hai-Long Hu; Chang-Li Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The preoperative serum cystatin-C as an independent prognostic factor for survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ping Tan; Ming Shi; Jie Chen; Hang Xu; Nan Xie; Huan Xu; Yong Jiang; Jian-Zhong Ai; Liang-Ren Liu; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Lijiang Sun; Fengju Guan; Fangming Wang; Guiming Zhang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.434

8.  Molecular classification and diagnostics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoichi Fujii; Yusuke Sato; Hiromichi Suzuki; Nobuyuki Kakiuchi; Tetsuichi Yoshizato; Andrew T Lenis; Shigekatsu Maekawa; Akira Yokoyama; Yasuhide Takeuchi; Yoshikage Inoue; Yotaro Ochi; Yusuke Shiozawa; Kosuke Aoki; Kenichi Yoshida; Keisuke Kataoka; Masahiro M Nakagawa; Yasuhito Nannya; Hideki Makishima; Jimpei Miyakawa; Taketo Kawai; Teppei Morikawa; Yuichi Shiraishi; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Genta Nagae; Masashi Sanada; Eiji Sugihara; Taka-Aki Sato; Tohru Nakagawa; Masashi Fukayama; Tetsuo Ushiku; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Satoru Miyano; Jonathan A Coleman; Yukio Homma; David B Solit; Haruki Kume; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 38.585

9.  Effects of tumor size and location on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Shreyas S Joshi; Laura L Quast; Sam S Chang; Sanjay G Patel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

10.  Prognostic significance of the albumin-to-globulin ratio for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shota Omura; Satoru Taguchi; Shogo Miyagawa; Ryuki Matsumoto; Mio Samejima; Naoki Ninomiya; Kazuki Masuda; Yu Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi; Manami Kinjo; Mitsuhiro Tambo; Takatsugu Okegawa; Eiji Higashihara; Hiroshi Fukuhara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.