| Literature DB >> 26934841 |
Biqiong Ren1, Xiaobin Wei1, Guoying Zou2, Junyu He2, Guofeng Xu2, Fei Xu2, Yiran Huang3, Haowen Zhu2, Yong Li2, Guoan Ma1, Ping Yu1.
Abstract
Cancer testis antigen sperm-associated antigen 9 (SPAG9) is highly expressed in many types of cancers. In the present study, to obtain a better understanding of the relevance of SPAG9 in cancer diagnosis and treatment, the expression of SPAG9 mRNA and protein in lung cancer specimens was evaluated by RT-PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemistry. ELISA was used to quantify the SPAG9 autoantibody in the peripheral blood of lung cancer patients. The results showed that the expression of SPAG9 mRNA and protein in the lung cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in the adjacent non-cancerous tissues (P<0.01). The level of the SPAG9 autoantibody in the serum of lung cancer patients was significantly higher than the level in the healthy controls (P<0.001), and the level of the SPAG9 autoantibody in the serum of untreated patients was significantly higher than that in treated patients (P=0.002). SPAG9 IgG antibody levels were significantly lower in treated adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer patients than these levels in the untreated patients (P=0.006, P=0.026, respectively), while no statistical difference was found between treated and untreated squamous cell carcinoma patients. Our results suggest that the SPAG9 antibody in serum is a promising marker for the diagnosis of lung cancer, and the level of the humoral immune response to this antigen appears to be related to the type of lung cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26934841 PMCID: PMC4811394 DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Rep ISSN: 1021-335X Impact factor: 3.906
Tissue evaluation: Characteristics of the 20 lung cancer patients.
| Sample | Age (years) | Gender | Tumor size (cm) | Histological diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | Male | 4.5×3.0×3.0 | Moderately and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma |
| 2 | 45 | Male | 3.5×2.0×2.0 | Moderately and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma |
| 3 | 70 | Male | 3.5×3.0×1.5 | Moderately differentiated, adenocarcinoma with regional differentiation |
| 4 | 60 | Female | 4.5×3.5×3.0 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 5 | 65 | Male | 4.0×3.5×3.0 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 6 | 55 | Male | 5.0×4.5×2.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 7 | 40 | Male | 7.5×5.0×4.0 | Moderately and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 8 | 52 | Male | 5.0×3.5×3.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 9 | 66 | Male | 5.0×4.0×3.0 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 10 | 55 | Male | 5.5×4.0×3.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 11 | 51 | Female | 4.5×3.0×3.0 | Moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma |
| 12 | 62 | Male | 5.0×4.0×3.0 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 13 | 65 | Male | 5.0×4.5×3.0 | Poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph node |
| 14 | 54 | Male | 4.5×3.0×2.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 15 | 65 | Male | 4.0×3.0×1.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 16 | 55 | Male | 5.5×4.0×2.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 17 | 51 | Male | 3.5×3.0×2.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 18 | 61 | Male | 5.0×4.5×4.0 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 19 | 53 | Male | 5.0×5.0×4.5 | Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, lymph nodes |
| 20 | 43 | Female | 3.0×2.5×2.0 | Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma |
Serum evaluation: Characteristics of the 92 patients and 35 controls.
| Characteristic | Untreated group (n=41) | Treated group (n=51) | Healthy controls (n=35) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| Mean ± SD | 60±11 | 56±11 | 53±10 |
| Range | 36–79 | 32–75 | 26–71 |
| Gender | |||
| No. of males | 35/41 | 39/51 | 26/35 |
| % males | 85.4 | 76.5 | 74.3 |
Serum evaluation: Clinicopathology and SPAG9 humoral immune reactions of the untreated and treated patientsa.
| Pathological and clinical features | SPAG9 antibody (OD)
| Positive/tested (%)
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | Treated | Untreated | Treated | |
| All tumors | 0.612±0.482 | 0.342±0.213 | 26/41 (63.4) | 10/51 (19.6) |
| Stage of non-small cell lung cancer | ||||
| Early (T1 and T2) | 0.664±0.642 | 0.392±0.228 | 7/13 (53.8) | 6/21 (28.6) |
| Late (T3 and T4) | 0.550±0.334 | 0.365±0.226 | 10/16 (62.5) | 2/17 (11.8) |
| Indeterminate | 0.476±0.254 | 0.200±0.09 | 7/12 (58.3) | 2/13 (15.4) |
| Grade of non-small cell lung cancer | ||||
| Low (G1 and G2) | 0.542±0.281 | 0.413±0.188 | 8/13 (61.5) | 3/13 (23.1) |
| High (G3 and G4) | 0.614±0.587 | 0.378±0.244 | 9/18 (50.0) | 5/24 (20.8) |
| Indeterminate | 0.510±0.276 | 0.224±0.127 | 7/10 (70.0) | 2/14 (14.3) |
| Type of tumor | ||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 0.626±0.540 | 0.431±0.247 | 12/23 (47.1) | 8/26 (30.8) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 0.477±0.208 | 0.264±0.101 | 5/7 (71.4) | 0/13 (0.0) |
| Small cell lung cancer | 0.844±0.661 | 0.235±0.152 | 4/5 (80.0) | 1/8 (12.5) |
Statistical analysis employed the Fisher's χ2 method. P<0.05 was taken as a statistically significant association.
Transverse comparison,
vertical comparison.
Includes small cell lung cancer patient samples.
Serum evaluation: Characteristics of the 45 patients who survived 2-years post-diagnosis and those who did not.
| Characteristic | Survival group (n=25) | Non-survival group (n=20) | Healthy controls (n=35) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| Mean ± SD | 59±11 | 56±10 | 53±10 |
| Range | 39–75 | 47–75 | 26–71 |
| Gender | |||
| No. of males | 19/25 | 16/20 | 26/35 |
| % males | 76.0 | 80.0 | 74.3 |
Figure 1SPAG9 mRNA expression in lung cancer and adjacent non-cancerous tissues was evaluated by RT-PCR with GAPDH as the internal reference. (A) Relative quantification in tumor tissues (black bars) and adjacent tissues (open bars). (B) The normalized SPAG9 gene expression in lung cancer tissues was upregulated by 8.29-fold (P<0.01).
Figure 2SPAG9 protein levels in lung cancer and adjacent non-cancerous tissues were evaluated by western blotting using GAPDH as internal reference. (A) Western blots of SPAG9 and GAPDH in tumor tissue from representative patients, 't' and 'a' indicate samples from cancerous tissue and adjacent tissues, respectively. (B) Quantification of western blot analysis of tumor tissue (black) and adjacent tissue (open bars). (C) IOC ratio of SPAG9 in tumor tissue was significantly higher than the ratio in adjacent tissue (P<0.001).
Tissue evaluation: Immunohistochemistry of the 20 lung cancer and adjacent non-cancerous tissues.
| Sample | Grade of staining intensity | Area of staining | Summed score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2+ | 3+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 2 | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | Negative |
| 3 | 2+ | 3+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 4 | 2+ | 1+ | 2 | Negative |
| 5 | 3+ | 2+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 6 | 3+ | 2+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Negative |
| 8 | 3+ | 2+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 9 | 3+ | 2+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 10 | 3+ | 1+ | 3 | Moderate staining |
| 11 | 3+ | 3+ | 6 | Strong staining |
| 12 | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | Moderate staining |
| 13 | 1+ | 2+ | 2 | Negative |
| 14 | 2+ | 3+ | 5 | Strong staining |
| 15 | 2+ | 2+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 16 | 3+ | 3+ | 6 | Strong staining |
| 17 | 2+ | 2+ | 4 | Moderate staining |
| 18 | 3+ | 2+ | 5 | Strong staining |
| 19 | 3+ | 2+ | 5 | Strong staining |
| 20 | 2+ | 3+ | 5 | Strong staining |
Figure 3SPAG9 protein expression was analyzed in lung tissues of by immunohistochemical staining. (A) Images of cancerous tissues a1-a20 from patients. (B) Images of adjacent tissue b1-b20 from the same patients. Magnification, ×400.
Figure 4(A) Levels of serum SPAG9 IgG antibody in lung cancer patients and healthy subjects. (B) Levels of serum SPAG9 IgG antibody in untreated patients, treated patients, and healthy subjects. (C) Levels of serum SPAG9 IgG antibody in patients who survived two years post-diagnosis and those who did not. Levels did not differ significantly.
Figure 5Levels of serum SPAG9 antibody in untreated adenocarcinoma and SCLC patients were significant higher than that in treated group; there was no significant difference in levels of serum SPAG9 antibody between treated and untreated SCC patients. SCLC, small cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cells carcinoma; adeno, adenocarcinoma.