Tolga Ozyigit1, Onur Kocas2, Berrin Karadag2, Beste Ozben3. 1. Department of Cardiology, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sisli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Cardiology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Yildiz Caddesi Konak Apartmani No: 43/16, 34353, Besiktas/Istanbul, Turkey. besteozben@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: P wave dispersion is a noninvasive electrocardiographic predictor for atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to explore relation between left atrial volume index assessed by 3-dimensional echocardiography and P wave dispersion in elderly patients. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients over the age of 65 (mean age: 75 ± 7 years, 17 men) were included. P wave dispersion is calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum P wave durations. Left atrial volume index was measured by both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional echocardiography and categorized as normal (≤ 34 mL/m(2)) or increased (mild, 35-41 mL/m(2); moderate, 42-48 mL/m(2); severe, ≥ 49 mL/m(2)). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had normal left atrium while 24 patients had mildly enlarged, nine had moderately enlarged, and nine had severely enlarged left atrium. Prolongation of P wave dispersion was more prevalent in patients with dilated left atrium. P wave dispersion was significantly correlated with both 2-dimensional (r = 0.600, p < 0.001) and 3-dimensional left atrial volume index (r = 0.688, p < 0.001). Both left atrial volume indexes were associated with prolonged P wave dispersion when adjusted for age, sex, presence of hypertension, and left ventricular mass index. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that a 3-dimensional left atrial volume index ≥ 25 mL/m(2) separated patients with prolonged P wave dispersion with a sensitivity of 82.2 %, specificity of 67.9 %, positive predictive value of 80.4 %, and negative predictive value of 70.4 %. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, 3-dimensional left atrial volume index showed a better correlation with P wave dispersion and might be helpful in discriminating patients with prolonged P wave dispersion, who might be prone to atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: P wave dispersion is a noninvasive electrocardiographic predictor for atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to explore relation between left atrial volume index assessed by 3-dimensional echocardiography and P wave dispersion in elderly patients. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients over the age of 65 (mean age: 75 ± 7 years, 17 men) were included. P wave dispersion is calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum P wave durations. Left atrial volume index was measured by both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional echocardiography and categorized as normal (≤ 34 mL/m(2)) or increased (mild, 35-41 mL/m(2); moderate, 42-48 mL/m(2); severe, ≥ 49 mL/m(2)). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had normal left atrium while 24 patients had mildly enlarged, nine had moderately enlarged, and nine had severely enlarged left atrium. Prolongation of P wave dispersion was more prevalent in patients with dilated left atrium. P wave dispersion was significantly correlated with both 2-dimensional (r = 0.600, p < 0.001) and 3-dimensional left atrial volume index (r = 0.688, p < 0.001). Both left atrial volume indexes were associated with prolonged P wave dispersion when adjusted for age, sex, presence of hypertension, and left ventricular mass index. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that a 3-dimensional left atrial volume index ≥ 25 mL/m(2) separated patients with prolonged P wave dispersion with a sensitivity of 82.2 %, specificity of 67.9 %, positive predictive value of 80.4 %, and negative predictive value of 70.4 %. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, 3-dimensional left atrial volume index showed a better correlation with P wave dispersion and might be helpful in discriminating patients with prolonged P wave dispersion, who might be prone to atrial fibrillation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Left atrial volume index; Left atrium; P wave dispersion
Authors: T S Tsang; M E Barnes; K R Bailey; C L Leibson; S C Montgomery; Y Takemoto; P M Diamond; M A Marra; B J Gersh; D O Wiebers; G W Petty; J B Seward Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: B Kircher; J A Abbott; S Pau; R G Gould; R B Himelman; C B Higgins; M J Lipton; N B Schiller Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Humberto Vidaillet; Juan F Granada; P o-Huang Chyou; Karen Maassen; Mario Ortiz; Juan N Pulido; Param Sharma; Peter N Smith; John Hayes Journal: Am J Med Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Victor Mor-Avi; Chattanong Yodwut; Carly Jenkins; Harald Kühl; Hans-Joachim Nesser; Thomas H Marwick; Andreas Franke; Lynn Weinert; Johannes Niel; Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer; Benjamin H Freed; Lissa Sugeng; Roberto M Lang Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-08
Authors: P E Dilaveris; E J Gialafos; D Chrissos; G K Andrikopoulos; D J Richter; E Lazaki; J E Gialafos Journal: J Hypertens Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Allison M Pritchett; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer; Barry L Karon; Margaret M Redfield Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-01-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Antonio Michelucci; Giuseppe Bagliani; Andrea Colella; Paolo Pieragnoli; Maria Cristina Porciani; Gianfranco Gensini; Luigi Padeletti Journal: Card Electrophysiol Rev Date: 2002-09
Authors: Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; José Grindler; Acácio Fernandes-Cardoso; Adrian Baranchuk Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2016-10-20