Fariborz Bagheri1,2, Csaba Pusztai2, László Farkas2, Panagiotis Kallidonis3, István Buzogány4, Zsuzsanna Szabó5, János Lantos6, Marianna Imre7, Nelli Farkas8, Árpád Szántó2. 1. Department of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, UAE. 2. Department of Urology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary. 3. Department of Urology, University of Hospital of Patras, 26504, Rion, Patras, Greece. pkallidonis@yahoo.com. 4. Department of Urology, PéterfySándor Street Hospital, Budapest, Hungary. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary. 6. Department of Research and Techniques, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary. 7. Diagnostic Center of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. 8. Institute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To elucidate the impact of renal parenchymal loss and the ischemic reperfusion injury (RI) on the renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) under warm ischemia (WI). METHODS: Thirty-five patients with a single polar renal mass ≤4 cm and normal contralateral kidney underwent LPN. Transperitoneal LPN with WI using en bloc hilar occlusion was performed. The total differential renal function (T-DRF) using 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively over a period of 1 year. A special region of interest (ROI) was selected on the non-tumorous pole of the involved kidney, and was compared with the same ROI in the contralateral kidney. The latter comparison was defined as partial differential renal function (P-DRF). Any postoperative decline in the P-DRF of the operated kidney was attributed to the RI. Subtraction of the P-DRF decline from the T-DRF decline was attributed to the parenchymal loss caused by the resection of the tumor and suturing of the normal parenchyma. RESULTS: The mean WI time was 22 min, and the mean weight of resected specimen was 18 g. The mean postoperative eGFR declined to 87 ml/min/1.73 m2 from its baseline mean value of 97 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p value = 0.075). Mean postoperative T-DRF and P-DRF of the operated kidney declined by 7 and 3 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After LPN of small renal mass, decline in renal function is primarily attributed to parenchymal loss caused by tumor resection and suturing of the normal parenchyma rather than the RI.
PURPOSE: To elucidate the impact of renal parenchymal loss and the ischemic reperfusion injury (RI) on the renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) under warm ischemia (WI). METHODS: Thirty-five patients with a single polar renal mass ≤4 cm and normal contralateral kidney underwent LPN. Transperitoneal LPN with WI using en bloc hilar occlusion was performed. The total differential renal function (T-DRF) using 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively over a period of 1 year. A special region of interest (ROI) was selected on the non-tumorous pole of the involved kidney, and was compared with the same ROI in the contralateral kidney. The latter comparison was defined as partial differential renal function (P-DRF). Any postoperative decline in the P-DRF of the operated kidney was attributed to the RI. Subtraction of the P-DRF decline from the T-DRF decline was attributed to the parenchymal loss caused by the resection of the tumor and suturing of the normal parenchyma. RESULTS: The mean WI time was 22 min, and the mean weight of resected specimen was 18 g. The mean postoperative eGFR declined to 87 ml/min/1.73 m2 from its baseline mean value of 97 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p value = 0.075). Mean postoperative T-DRF and P-DRF of the operated kidney declined by 7 and 3 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After LPN of small renal mass, decline in renal function is primarily attributed to parenchymal loss caused by tumor resection and suturing of the normal parenchyma rather than the RI.
Authors: Toshio Takagi; Maria C Mir; Nidhi Sharma; Erick M Remer; Jianbo Li; Sevag Demirjian; Jihad H Kaouk; Steven C Campbell Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Maria C Mir; Rebecca A Campbell; Nidhi Sharma; Erick M Remer; Matt N Simmons; Jianbo Li; Sevag Demirjian; Jihad Kaouk; Steven C Campbell Journal: Urology Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Nidhi Sharma; Jerome O'Hara; Andrew C Novick; Michael Lieber; Erick M Remer; Brian R Herts Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Rauter; Daniel Baumunk; Frank Christoph; Frank König; Matthias May; Martin Schostak Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Xiaojie Wang; Jialing Liu; Wenqing Yin; Farhiya Abdi; Paul D Pang; Quynh-Anh Fucci; Molly Abbott; Steven L Chang; Graeme Steele; Ankit Patel; Yutaro Mori; Aifeng Zhang; Shikai Zhu; Tzong-Shi Lu; Adam S Kibel; Bin Wang; Kenneth Lim; Andrew M Siedlecki Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 4.307