| Literature DB >> 26929914 |
Sunyoung Jung1, Bo-Mi Hwang1, Hyun Ju Jeong1, Gyung Tae Chung1, Cheon-Kwon Yoo1, Yeon-Ho Kang2, Deog-Yong Lee1.
Abstract
Human noroviruses are major causative agents of food and waterborne outbreaks of nonbacterial acute gastroenteritis. In this study, we report the epidemiological features of three outbreak cases of norovirus in Korea, and we describe the clinical symptoms and distribution of the causative genotypes. The incidence rates of the three outbreaks were 16.24% (326/2,007), 4.1% (27/656), and 16.8% (36/214), respectively. The patients in these three outbreaks were affected by acute gastroenteritis. These schools were provided unheated food from the same manufacturing company. Two genotypes (GII.3 and GII.4) of the norovirus were detected in these cases. Among them, major causative strains of GII.4 (Hu-jeju-47-2007KR-like) were identified in patients, food handlers, and groundwater from the manufacturing company of the unheated food. In the GII.4 (Hu-jeju-47-2007KR-like) strain of the norovirus, the nucleotide sequences were identical and identified as the GII.4 Sydney variant. Our data suggests that the combined epidemiological and laboratory results were closely related, and the causative pathogen was the GII.4 Sydney variant strain from contaminated groundwater.Entities:
Keywords: GII.4 Sydney variant; norovirus; outbreak
Year: 2015 PMID: 26929914 PMCID: PMC4677502 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2015.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osong Public Health Res Perspect ISSN: 2210-9099
Comparison of epidemiological and laboratory characteristics.
| Features of outbreaks | Outbreak A | Outbreak B | Outbreak C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidemiological features | |||
| Attack rate (%) | 326/2007 (16.24) | 27/656 (4.1) | 36/214 (16.8) |
| Symptomatic patients | 326 | 27 | 36 |
| Date of onset | Nov 21, 2012 | Nov 30, 2012 | Nov 30, 2012 |
| Scale(s) | Large | Medium | Medium |
| Type of setting | School | School | School |
| Clinical symptoms (%) | |||
| Diarrhea | 326/326 (100) | 23/27 (85.2) | 26/36 (72.2) |
| Nausea | 223/326 (68.4) | 24/27 (88.9) | 24/36 (66.7) |
| Abdominal pain | 205/326 (62.9) | 25/27 (92.6) | 17/36 (47.2) |
| Vomiting | 156/326 (47.9) | 14/27 (51.9) | 26/36 (72.2) |
| Fever | 190/326 (58.3) | 14/27 (51.9) | 17/36 (47.2) |
| Laboratory test | |||
| No. of examinations of patients | 99 | 10 | 22 |
| Positive samples | 46 | 2 | 12 |
| Genogroup I | — | — | — |
| Genogroup II | 46 | 2 | 12 |
| No. of examinations of food-handlers | 28 | 14 | 5 |
| Positive samples | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Genogroup I | — | — | — |
| Genogroup II | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Environmental samples | 13 | ||
| Causative foods (unheated foods) | 9 | ||
| Genogroup I | — | ||
| Genogroup II | 9 | ||
| Supplemental water | 3 | ||
| Genogroup I | — | ||
| Genogroup II | 3 | ||
| Groundwater | 1 | ||
| Genogroup I | — | ||
| Genogroup II | 1 | ||
Oligo nucleotide sequences of primers used in this study.
| Genogroup | Name of primer | Sequence (5′→3′) | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI | NoGI-F1 | ATGGCCATGTTCCGITGGATG | Stool specimen |
| NoGI-F2 | CGGGCCCGAATTYGTAAATGATG | ||
| NoGI-R | CCAACCCARCCATTRTACATYTG | ||
| GI-F1M | CTGCCCGAATTYGTAAATGATGAT | Stool & environmental samples | |
| GI-F2 | ATGATGATGGCGTCTAAGGACGC | ||
| NoGI-R | CCAACCCARCCATTRTACATYTG | ||
| GII | NoGII-F1 | CCCTCGAGGGCGATCGCAATCT | Stool specimen |
| NoGII-F2 | CACAATTGTGAATGAAGATGGCGTCGA | ||
| NoGII-R | CCRCCIGCATRICCRTTRTACAT | ||
| GII-F1M | GGGAGGGCGATCGCAATCT | Stool & environmental samples | |
| GII-F3M | TTGTGAATGAAGATGGCGTCGART | ||
| NoGII-R | CCRCCIGCATRICCRTTRTACAT |
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of the norovirus detected from patients, food handlers, and environmental samples (unheated foods, supplemental water, and groundwater). The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method with norovirus partial capsid region (312-314bp). The numbers in the branches indicate the bootstrap values.
Distribution of norovirus GII-4 variant analyzed in this study.
| Name of variant | Outbreak A | Outbreak B | Outbreak C | Environmental samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006b | — | — | 1 (7.1) | — |
| 2010 | — | — | — | 2 (16.7) |
| 2012 | 44 (100) | 7 (100) | 13 (92.9) | 10 (83.3) |
Data are presented as n (%).