Literature DB >> 26928130

An epigenetic resolution of the lek paradox.

Melvin M Bonilla1,2, Jeanne A Zeh1, David W Zeh1.   

Abstract

Female choice for traits signaling male genetic quality is expected to erode heritable variation in fitness, undermining the benefits of choice. Known as the lek paradox, this contradiction has motivated extensive population genetic theory, yet remains unresolved. Recent modeling by Bonduriansky and Day concludes that costly female preference is best maintained when male condition is determined by environmentally induced factors transmitted across single generations. Here, we reformulate their model in explicitly epigenetic terms, and review evidence that environmentally induced paternal effects are mediated through epigenetic changes in sperm. Noncoding RNA expression, DNA methylation and histone modifications are highly sensitive to diet, stress, toxicants and stochastic events. Epigenetic variation renews each generation and cannot be exhausted by selection. By choosing well-endowed males that produce gametes in epigenetically good states, females can increase their fitness directly through increased fertilization success or indirectly through epigenetic effects on the fitness of offspring and potentially subsequent generations. Also watch the video abstract.
© 2016 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  condition-dependence; epigenetically good genes hypothesis; epigenetics; female choice; lek paradox

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928130     DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  5 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic paternal effects as costly, condition-dependent traits.

Authors:  Erin L Macartney; Angela J Crean; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Can paternal effects via seminal fluid contribute to the evolution of polyandry?

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Lovegrove
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance.

Authors:  Eva Jablonka
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Strong spatial population structure shapes the temporal coevolutionary dynamics of costly female preference and male display.

Authors:  Maximilian Tschol; Jane M Reid; Greta Bocedi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Mapping the past, present and future research landscape of paternal effects.

Authors:  Joanna Rutkowska; Malgorzata Lagisz; Russell Bonduriansky; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 7.431

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.