Literature DB >> 26925588

Diversity of phage infection types and associated terminology: the problem with 'Lytic or lysogenic'.

Zack Hobbs1, Stephen T Abedon2.   

Abstract

Bacteriophages, or phages, are viruses of members of domain Bacteria. These viruses play numerous roles in shaping the diversity of microbial communities, with impact differing depending on what infection strategies specific phages employ. From an applied perspective, these especially are communities containing undesired or pathogenic bacteria that can be modified through phage-mediated bacterial biocontrol, that is, through phage therapy. Here we seek to categorize phages in terms of their infection strategies as well as review or suggest more descriptive, accurate or distinguishing terminology. Categories can be differentiated in terms of (1) whether or not virion release occurs (productive infections versus lysogeny, pseudolysogeny and/or the phage carrier state), (2) the means of virion release (lytic versus chronic release) and (3) the degree to which phages are genetically equipped to display lysogenic cycles (temperate versus non-temperate phages). We address in particular the use or overuse of what can be a somewhat equivocal phrase, 'Lytic or lysogenic', especially when employed as a means of distinguishing among phages types. We suggest that the implied dichotomy is inconsistent with both modern as well as historical understanding of phage biology. We consider, therefore, less ambiguous terminology for distinguishing between 'Lytic' versus 'Lysogenic' phage types. © FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lytic phage; obligately lytic; phage therapy; professionally lytic; strictly lytic; temperate phage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26925588     DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  48 in total

Review 1.  The impact of quorum sensing on the modulation of phage-host interactions.

Authors:  Josefina León-Félix; Claudia Villicaña
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Phage-Enabled Nanomedicine: From Probes to Therapeutics in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Kegan S Sunderland; Mingying Yang; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 3.  Pharmacologically Aware Phage Therapy: Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Obstacles to Phage Antibacterial Action in Animal and Human Bodies.

Authors:  Krystyna Dąbrowska; Stephen T Abedon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Implications of Bacteriophage- and Bacteriophage Component-Based Therapies for the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Katherine M Caflisch; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Intestinal virome and therapeutic potential of bacteriophages in liver disease.

Authors:  Cynthia L Hsu; Yi Duan; Derrick E Fouts; Bernd Schnabl
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Expanding the Database of Signal-Anchor-Release Domain Endolysins Through Metagenomics.

Authors:  Marco Túlio Pardini Gontijo; Mateus Pereira Teles; Pedro Marcus Pereira Vidigal; Marcelo Brocchi
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 7.  Mutualistic interplay between bacteriophages and bacteria in the human gut.

Authors:  Andrey N Shkoporov; Christopher J Turkington; Colin Hill
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Host life-history traits influence the distribution of prophages and the genes they carry.

Authors:  Tyler Pattenden; Christine Eagles; Lindi M Wahl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Revisiting the rules of life for viruses of microorganisms.

Authors:  Adrienne M S Correa; Cristina Howard-Varona; Samantha R Coy; Alison Buchan; Matthew B Sullivan; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes.

Authors:  Roberto Orellana; Alejandra Arancibia; Leonardo Badilla; Jonathan Acosta; Gabriela Arancibia; Rodrigo Escar; Gustavo Ferrada; Michael Seeger
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.