Literature DB >> 33925267

Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes.

Roberto Orellana1, Alejandra Arancibia1, Leonardo Badilla1, Jonathan Acosta2, Gabriela Arancibia3, Rodrigo Escar3, Gustavo Ferrada3, Michael Seeger3.   

Abstract

Sulfate reducing prokaryotes (SRP) are a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse group of microorganisms that use sulfate as an electron acceptor. SRP have long been recognized as key players of the carbon and sulfur cycles, and more recently, they have been identified to play a relevant role as part of syntrophic and symbiotic relations and the human microbiome. Despite their environmental relevance, there is a poor understanding about the prevalence of prophages and CRISPR arrays and how their distribution and dynamic affect the ecological role of SRP. We addressed this question by analyzing the results of a comprehensive survey of prophages and CRISPR in a total of 91 genomes of SRP with several genotypic, phenotypic, and physiological traits, including genome size, cell volume, minimum doubling time, cell wall, and habitat, among others. Our analysis discovered 81 prophages in 51 strains, representing the 56% of the total evaluated strains. Prophages are non-uniformly distributed across the SRP phylogeny, where prophage-rich lineages belonged to Desulfovibrionaceae and Peptococcaceae. Furthermore, our study found 160 CRISPR arrays in 71 SRP, which is more abundant and widely spread than previously expected. Although there is no correlation between presence and abundance of prophages and CRISPR arrays at the strain level, our analysis showed that there is a directly proportional relation between cellular volumes and number of prophages per cell. This result suggests that there is an additional selective pressure for strains with smaller cells to get rid of foreign DNA, such as prophages, but not CRISPR, due to less availability of cellular resources. Analysis of the prophage genes encoding viral structural proteins reported that 44% of SRP prophages are classified as Myoviridae, and comparative analysis showed high level of homology, but not synteny, among prophages belonging to the Family Desulfovibrionaceae. We further recovered viral-like particles and structures that resemble outer membrane vesicles from D. vulgaris str. Hildenborough. The results of this study improved the current understanding of dynamic interactions between prophages and CRISPR with their hosts in both cultured and hitherto-uncultured SRP strains, and how their distribution affects the microbial community dynamics in several sulfidogenic natural and engineered environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecophysiology; prophages; sulfate reduction; sulfate-reducing prokaryotes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925267     DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9050931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microorganisms        ISSN: 2076-2607


  83 in total

1.  Isolation and Characterization of a Bacteriophage Lytic for Desulfovibrio salexigens, a Salt-Requiring, Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium.

Authors:  K Kamimura; M Araki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Novel energy conservation strategies and behaviour of Pelotomaculum schinkii driving syntrophic propionate catabolism.

Authors:  Catalina A P Hidalgo-Ahumada; Masaru K Nobu; Takashi Narihiro; Hideyuki Tamaki; Wen-Tso Liu; Yoichi Kamagata; Alfons J M Stams; Hiroyuki Imachi; Diana Z Sousa
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Desulfovibrio alaskensis sp. nov., a sulphate-reducing bacterium from a soured oil reservoir.

Authors:  Maria J Feio; Vitaly Zinkevich; Iwona B Beech; Enric Llobet-Brossa; Peter Eaton; Jürgen Schmitt; Jean Guezennec
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Bacteriophage lytic to Desulfovibrio aespoeensis isolated from deep groundwater.

Authors:  Hallgerd S C Eydal; Sara Jägevall; Malte Hermansson; Karsten Pedersen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Desulfotomaculum hydrothermale sp. nov., a thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from a terrestrial Tunisian hot spring.

Authors:  Olfa Haouari; Marie-Laure Fardeau; Jean-Luc Cayol; Corinne Casiot; Françoise Elbaz-Poulichet; Moktar Hamdi; Manon Joseph; Bernard Ollivier
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  F Widdel; N Pfennig
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases.

Authors:  Albert Leopold Müller; Kasper Urup Kjeldsen; Thomas Rattei; Michael Pester; Alexander Loy
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins.

Authors:  David Couvin; Aude Bernheim; Claire Toffano-Nioche; Marie Touchon; Juraj Michalik; Bertrand Néron; Eduardo P C Rocha; Gilles Vergnaud; Daniel Gautheret; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Characterization of Flagellotropic, Chi-Like Salmonella Phages Isolated from Thai Poultry Farms.

Authors:  Preeda Phothaworn; Matthew Dunne; Rattaya Supokaivanich; Catherine Ong; Jiali Lim; Rutjawate Taharnklaew; Mongkol Vesaratchavest; Rabuesak Khumthong; Onanong Pringsulaka; Pravech Ajawatanawong; Jochen Klumpp; Nathan Brown; Mohammed Imam; Martha R J Clokie; Edouard E Galyov; Sunee Korbsrisate
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 10.  Phages in Anaerobic Systems.

Authors:  Santiago Hernández; Martha J Vives
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.