Literature DB >> 26924191

Reflections on the present and future of upper limb prostheses.

Dario Farina1, Sebastian Amsüss1,2.   

Abstract

Despite progress in research and media attention on active upper limb prostheses, presently the most common commercial upper limb prosthetic devices are not fundamentally different from solutions offered almost one century ago. Limited information transfer for both control and sensory-motor integration and challenges in socket technology have been major obstacles. By analysing the present state-of-the-art and academic achievements, we provide our opinion on the future of upper limb prostheses. We believe that surgical procedures for muscle reinnervation and osseointegration will become increasingly clinically relevant; muscle electrical signals will remain the main clinical means for prosthetic control; and chronic electrode implants, first in muscles (control), then in nerves (sensory feedback), will become viable clinical solutions. After decades of suspended clinically relevant progress, it is foreseeable that a new generation of upper limb prostheses will enter the market in the near future based on such advances, thereby offering substantial clinical benefit for patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; hand; limb amputation; myocontrol; prosthesis; robotics; sensory-motor interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26924191     DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2016.1159511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  Artificial referred sensation in upper and lower limb prosthesis users: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Gonzalez; Alex Bismuth; Christina Lee; Cynthia A Chestek; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Internet of Things and Robotics in Transforming Current-Day Healthcare Services.

Authors:  Bikash Pradhan; Deepti Bharti; Sumit Chakravarty; Sirsendu S Ray; Vera V Voinova; Anton P Bonartsev; Kunal Pal
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  SEEDS, simultaneous recordings of high-density EMG and finger joint angles during multiple hand movements.

Authors:  Ana Matran-Fernandez; Itzel Jared Rodríguez Martínez; Riccardo Poli; Christian Cipriani; Luca Citi
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.444

4.  Bionic reconstruction : Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses.

Authors:  Martin Aman; Christopher Festin; Matthias E Sporer; Clemens Gstoettner; Cosima Prahm; Konstantin D Bergmeister; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Improving Robotic Hand Prosthesis Control With Eye Tracking and Computer Vision: A Multimodal Approach Based on the Visuomotor Behavior of Grasping.

Authors:  Matteo Cognolato; Manfredo Atzori; Roger Gassert; Henning Müller
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  Editorial: Bionics limb prostheses: Advances in clinical and prosthetic care.

Authors:  Laurent Frossard; Silvia Conforto; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

7.  A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Violet R Borkowska; Alistair McConnell; Sethu Vijayakumar; Adam Stokes; Aidan D Roche
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

8.  Discrimination and Recognition of Phantom Finger Sensation Through Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Mengnan Li; Dingguo Zhang; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Longwen He; Ying Chen; Jinyao Guo; Xiaohong Sui
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Marko Markovic; Meike A Schweisfurth; Leonard F Engels; Tashina Bentz; Daniela Wüstefeld; Dario Farina; Strahinja Dosen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Ingela K Carlsson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Birgitta Rosén
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.