| Literature DB >> 26923332 |
D Sando1, Yurong Yang2, E Bousquet3, C Carrétéro1, V Garcia1, S Fusil1, D Dolfi4, A Barthélémy1, Ph Ghosez3, L Bellaiche2, M Bibes1.
Abstract
The control of optical fields is usually achieved through the electro-optic or acousto-optic effect in single-crystal ferroelectric or polar compounds such as LiNbO3 or quartz. In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in ferroelectric oxide thin film technology-a field which is now a strong driving force in areas such as electronics, spintronics and photovoltaics. Here, we apply epitaxial strain engineering to tune the optical response of BiFeO3 thin films, and find a very large variation of the optical index with strain, corresponding to an effective elasto-optic coefficient larger than that of quartz. We observe a concomitant strain-driven variation in light absorption--reminiscent of piezochromism--which we show can be manipulated by an electric field. This constitutes an electrochromic effect that is reversible, remanent and not driven by defects. These findings broaden the potential of multiferroics towards photonics and thin film acousto-optic devices, and suggest exciting device opportunities arising from the coupling of ferroic, piezoelectric and optical responses.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26923332 PMCID: PMC4773452 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Electronic structure of strained BiFeO3 thin films.
(a) Sketch of the two structural variants present in our monoclinic (MA or MB) R-like BiFeO3 films. The red arrows indicate the direction of the monoclinic distortion for the two variants D1 and D2. (b) In-plane and out-of-plane lattice parameters of our strained BFO films. Total density of state (DOS) for R-like (c) and T-like phases (d). The insets show the DOS near the CBM. Partial density of states (PDOS) of iron 3d (e–h) and oxygen (i–l) states for R-like and T-like BFO. Note the break between 0.2 and 2.3 eV in the horizontal axes in (e–l). For all panels, only the spin-up channel states are shown; the spin-down channel states are the same as the spin up due to the antiferromagnetic order.
Figure 2Optical absorption properties of strained BiFeO3 films.
(a) Measured extinction coefficient for three representative strain levels. (b) Calculated extinction coefficient for strain levels comparable to those displayed in a. (c) Tauc plots generated from measurements for representative samples. (d) Summary of optical bandgap versus strain results, comparing theory and experiment. The error bars were determined by generating the dispersion laws using the upper and lower bounds of the Tauc–Lorentz oscillator parameters (from their uncertainties) and finding the resultant maximum variation in the bandgap.
Figure 3Electrochromism in BiFeO3 thin films.
(a) Topography image after poling a 10 × 10 μm2 square, locally transforming R+T BFO into T-like BFO. (b) Transmission optical image acquired in the same region with a dielectric filter centred at 420 nm (bandwidth 10 nm). (c) Topography image of the same area after poling a 5 × 5 μm2 region with an opposite voltage, restoring the R+T structure. (d) Transmission optical image with a 420-nm filter. The horizontal dark features are due to twin boundaries in the LaAlO3 substrate. All white scale bars are 5 μm. (e) Blue symbols: normalized difference in transmitted light in (T) and out (R+T) of the square in a with dielectric filters centred at different wavelengths. Red line: expected contrast calculated from the transmission of pure R-like and T-like films and the transmission function of the dielectric filters. The error bars in e are derived from the s.d. of the image pixel values in zones in and out of the T and (R+T) regions.
Figure 4Optical refractive index and elasto-optic coefficients in strained BiFeO3 films.
(a) Measured refractive index n as a function of wavelength for various strain levels. (b) Measured refractive index as a function of strain for various wavelengths, for the R-like phase only. The lines serve as guides to the eye. (c) Measured and calculated refractive index at 633 nm as a function of strain. The error bars were determined by generating the dispersion laws using the upper and lower bounds of the Tauc–Lorentz oscillator parameters (from their uncertainties) and finding the resultant maximum variation in the refractive index. (d) Effective elasto-optic coefficient of BFO as a function of wavelength. Representative reported largest elasto-optic coefficients of various other crystalline materials are plotted for comparison.