Cheng-Chieh Cheng1, Chang-Sheng Mei2, Jeffrey Duryea1, Hsiao-Wen Chung3, Tzu-Cheng Chao4, Lawrence P Panych1, Bruno Madore1. 1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Physics, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present a dual-pathway multi-echo steady state sequence and reconstruction algorithm to capture T2, T2(∗) and field map information. METHODS: Typically, pulse sequences based on spin echoes are needed for T2 mapping while gradient echoes are needed for field mapping, making it difficult to jointly acquire both types of information. A dual-pathway multi-echo pulse sequence is employed here to generate T2 and field maps from the same acquired data. The approach might be used, for example, to obtain both thermometry and tissue damage information during thermal therapies, or susceptibility and T2 information from a same head scan, or to generate bonus T2 maps during a knee scan. RESULTS: Quantitative T2, T2(∗) and field maps were generated in gel phantoms, ex vivo bovine muscle, and twelve volunteers. T2 results were validated against a spin-echo reference standard: A linear regression based on ROI analysis in phantoms provided close agreement (slope/R(2)=0.99/0.998). A pixel-wise in vivo Bland-Altman analysis of R2=1/T2 showed a bias of 0.034 Hz (about 0.3%), as averaged over four volunteers. Ex vivo results, with and without motion, suggested that tissue damage detection based on T2 rather than temperature-dose measurements might prove more robust to motion. CONCLUSION: T2, T2(∗) and field maps were obtained simultaneously, from the same datasets, in thermometry, susceptibility-weighted imaging and knee-imaging contexts.
PURPOSE: To present a dual-pathway multi-echo steady state sequence and reconstruction algorithm to capture T2, T2(∗) and field map information. METHODS: Typically, pulse sequences based on spin echoes are needed for T2 mapping while gradient echoes are needed for field mapping, making it difficult to jointly acquire both types of information. A dual-pathway multi-echo pulse sequence is employed here to generate T2 and field maps from the same acquired data. The approach might be used, for example, to obtain both thermometry and tissue damage information during thermal therapies, or susceptibility and T2 information from a same head scan, or to generate bonus T2 maps during a knee scan. RESULTS: Quantitative T2, T2(∗) and field maps were generated in gel phantoms, ex vivo bovine muscle, and twelve volunteers. T2 results were validated against a spin-echo reference standard: A linear regression based on ROI analysis in phantoms provided close agreement (slope/R(2)=0.99/0.998). A pixel-wise in vivo Bland-Altman analysis of R2=1/T2 showed a bias of 0.034 Hz (about 0.3%), as averaged over four volunteers. Ex vivo results, with and without motion, suggested that tissue damage detection based on T2 rather than temperature-dose measurements might prove more robust to motion. CONCLUSION: T2, T2(∗) and field maps were obtained simultaneously, from the same datasets, in thermometry, susceptibility-weighted imaging and knee-imaging contexts.
Authors: Christian Langkammer; Nikolaus Krebs; Walter Goessler; Eva Scheurer; Franz Ebner; Kathrin Yen; Franz Fazekas; Stefan Ropele Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Y Anzai; R B Lufkin; D J Castro; K Farahani; B A Jabour; L J Layfield; R Udkoff; W N Hanafee Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1991 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tony Stöcker; Fabian Keil; Kaveh Vahedipour; Daniel Brenner; Eberhard Pracht; N Jon Shah Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Michael J House; Timothy G St Pierre; Kris V Kowdley; Thomas Montine; James Connor; John Beard; Jose Berger; Narendra Siddaiah; Eric Shankland; Lee-Way Jin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Blake E Zimmerman; Sara Johnson; Henrik Odeen; Jill Shea; Markus D Foote; Nicole Winkler; Sarang C Joshi; Allison Payne Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Akshay S Chaudhari; Marianne S Black; Susanne Eijgenraam; Wolfgang Wirth; Susanne Maschek; Bragi Sveinsson; Felix Eckstein; Edwin H G Oei; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.813