Literature DB >> 26922690

Clinical experience with orthotic repair of pectus carinatum.

Iskander S Al-Githmi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pectus carinatum is a congenital chest wall deformity characterized by protrusion of the sternum and adjacent costal cartilages. Multiple treatment options are available for correction of pectus carinatum.
OBJECTIVE: We report our initial experience with first-line treatment using a custom fitted dynamic compression orthosis.
DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of all patients seen between November 2013 and December 2014.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment protocol for patients who had pressure for initial correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922690      PMCID: PMC6074280          DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Saudi Med        ISSN: 0256-4947            Impact factor:   1.526


Pectus carinatum is a congenital chest wall deformity characterized by anterior protrusion of the sternum and adjacent costal cartilages. Pectus carinatum is observed more commonly in male than female patients (male:female ratio, 5:1). Pectus carinatum has no known cause, but may occur in association with congenital heart disease, Marfan syndrome, and other connective tissue disorders.1 In chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum, which is the most common type of pectus carinatum, the middle and lower parts of the sternum protrude forward and the costal cartilages are concave and depressed. Surgical repair has been the primary treatment during the past five decades. However, successful correction of pectus carinatum with a dynamic compression orthosis has been reported.2 The principle of orthotic repair of pectus carinatum is based on the Wolff law; healthy bone and cartilage that are loaded with a constant and increasing force will adapt, strengthen, and remodel. We present our experience with orthotic repair for patients who had chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2013 and December 2014, all patients with chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum treated at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, were included in this study and treated with a custom-fitted dynamic compression orthosis. At the first consultation, a complete history was taken, physical examination was performed, and pressure for initial correction was measured by applying an electronic measuring device on the deformity until a normal shape was observed (Figure 1). Further anthropometric measurements were obtained to customize the dynamic compression orthosis (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Patient with chondrogladiolar PC demonstrating measurement of PIC in psi (A), Chest circumference in cm (B) and thoracic depth in cm (C).

The orthosis included three lightweight aluminum curved segments, assembled to create a belt surrounding the chest wall at the level of the pectus carinatum deformity. A cushioned compression plate was attached to the anterior segment of the orthosis and applied to the deformity (Figure 2). Patients were advised to wear the brace for 15 to 24 hours per day. After the initial orthotic fitting, patients were reevaluated in the clinic within 4 weeks to assess compliance and followed every 3 months until correction was completed. Patient compliance was rated as satisfactory when daily use of the brace was ≥15 hours and there were visits to the clinic every 3 months. Patient satisfaction with the result was measured subjectively by patients or parents using a qualitative scoring scale (Table 1).
Figure 2

Patient with chondrogladiolar PC (A) and with fitted dynamic compressor brace (B).

Table 1

Subjective patient satisfaction scale for pectus carinatum and results of treatment with dynamic compression orthosis.*

GradeDefinitionNo. of patients (%)

0No correction3 (17)
1Minimal improvement3 (17)
2Good improvement0 (0)
3Remarkable improvement5 (28)
4Complete correction7 (39)

n=18 patients.

Data reported as number (%).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated for chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum, including 17 male patients (94%) and 1 female patient (6%) (age: mean, 15.5 y; range, 10–23 y). The chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum included a central deformity in 9 patients (50%) and lateral deformity in 9 patients (50%). Mean bracing time per day was 12.8 hours (range, 10–24 h), and the mean pressure for initial correction was 4.5 psi (range, 2.2–7.3 psi). Follow-up was 12 months. Seven patients (39%) with a mean pressure for initial correction of 3.5 psi and bracing time ≥15 hours/day had complete correction of the deformity (Table 1). In 5 patients (28%) who had a mean pressure for initial correction 5.6 psi and bracing time 8 to 15 hours/day, good improvement was achieved. In 6 patients (33%) who had a mean pressure for initial correction of 4.9 psi and bracing time <8 hours/day, there was minimal improvement or no correction (Table 1). There were no complications during the study, and no patient had recurrence of deformity after removal of the dynamic compression orthosis. A significant improvement in pectus carinatum patient before and after dynamic compression orthosis is shown in Figure 3A, B.
Figure 3

A Picture of a patient with chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum before treatment (A), a picture of the same patient after treatment (B).

DISCUSSION

Pectus carinatum describes a range of chest wall deformities characterized by a convex protrusion of the sternum and the adjacent costal cartilages. The condition is thought to result from the abnormal growth of the costal cartilages resulting in an anterior chest wall protrusion of varying severity. The type of pectus carinatum type is determined by the appearance of the anterior chest wall and the location of prominent and depressed areas. The deformity may be classified as both chondrogladiolar and chondromanubrial. The present results showed that dynamic compression orthosis was successful for treatment of chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum in patients who had better compliance and lower pressure for initial correction. Although surgery has been the primary treatment for pectus carinatum, surgery requires general anesthesia and may cause postoperative pain and a residual visible scar. Several reports have shown that compression bracing to correct pectus carinatum is safe, reliable, and effective.2–5 Patient compliance is the most important factor that contributes to good results with the dynamic compression orthosis. The therapy is effective when the orthosis is worn ≥15 hours per day, as confirmed in our study. Orthotic repair in childhood and early adolescence seems to be the optimal time for initiating this approach as the deformity is flexible and reducible. Patients are typically instructed to wear the brace for 15–24 hours a day until complete correction is achieved. The orthosis should not be worn during bath or physical exercise. After complete subjective improvement is noted, the maintenance phase is initiated with nightly brace wearing until linear growth ceases and by the age of 18 years. Dynamic compression orthosis has advantages over other orthotic braces. The measurement of chest wall compliance with an electronic measuring device may serve as a predictor of treatment efficacy, facilitate patient selection for bracing, and predict duration of treatment. In addition, adjustment of pressure during treatment may help avoid skin necrosis and patient noncompliance. In patients who have pressure for initial correction ≤7.5 psi, the dynamic compression system may be the treatment of choice.6,7 Our experience in patients with pectus carinatum treated with the external dynamic compression system was very good. We limited pressure for initial correction ≤7.5 psi for all patients. We observed good results in younger patients within 2 to 3 months when they wore the dynamic compression orthosis for 24 hours/day. Our success is evidence of the importance of patient compliance and motivation and parental support. Patient compliance with regular wearing of the orthosis for long hours per day is important for success with this treatment method.8,9 A limitation of our study is that we used only satisfaction scores, which are subjective,.No objective findings were assessed. We recommend chest computed tomography for follow up and a radiological tool for comparison. In conclusion, the present results show that the dynamic compression orthosis is effective nonoperative therapy in patients who have pectus carinatum. We currently are offering this method as first-line treatment for patients who have chondrogladiolar pectus carinatum.
  8 in total

1.  Nonoperative management of pectus carinatum.

Authors:  Ala Stanford Frey; Victor F Garcia; Rebeccah L Brown; Thomas H Inge; Frederick C Ryckman; Aliza P Cohen; Greg Durrett; Richard G Azizkhan
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  New approaches to pectus and other minimally invasive surgery in Argentina.

Authors:  Marcelo Martinez-Ferro
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Nonoperative correction of pectus carinatum with orthotic bracing.

Authors:  Gregory T Banever; Stanley H Konefal; Kim Gettens; Kevin P Moriarty
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  The Calgary protocol for bracing of pectus carinatum: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Dragan Kravarusic; Bryan J Dicken; Richard Dewar; James Harder; Philippe Poncet; Mark Schneider; David L Sigalet
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Compressive orthotics in the treatment of asymmetric pectus carinatum: a preliminary report with an objective radiographic marker.

Authors:  J C Egan; J J DuBois; M Morphy; T L Samples; B Lindell
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Dynamic compression system for the correction of pectus carinatum.

Authors:  Marcelo Martinez-Ferro; Carlos Fraire; Silvia Bernard
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Preliminary results of orthotic treatment of pectus deformities in children and adolescents.

Authors:  S A Haje; J R Bowen
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  A 5-year experience with a minimally invasive technique for pectus carinatum repair.

Authors:  Horacio Abramson; José D'Agostino; Sebastián Wuscovi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.545

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Orthotic Bracing or Minimally Invasive Surgery? A Summary of 767 Pectus Carinatum Cases for 9 Years.

Authors:  Ziyin Shang; Chun Hong; Xianlun Duan; Xiangyong Li; Yuan Si
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.