Literature DB >> 16677884

The Calgary protocol for bracing of pectus carinatum: a preliminary report.

Dragan Kravarusic1, Bryan J Dicken, Richard Dewar, James Harder, Philippe Poncet, Mark Schneider, David L Sigalet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of pectus carinatum (PC) deformities is unclear. We propose a nonoperative approach using a lightweight, patient-controlled dynamic chest-bracing device.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: With ethical approval, 24 patients with PC were treated at the Alberta Children's Hospital between January 1998 and April 2005. There were 6 (25%) females and 18 (75%) males, with a mean age of 12.9 years at the onset of treatment. Treatment involved fitting of a lightweight, patient-controlled chest brace, worn for 23 hours per day (correction phase [CP]) until the convex deformity was corrected. Following correction of the deformity, bracing was reduced to 8 hours per day (maintenance phase) until axial skeletal maturation ceased. Monitoring was done by measurement of the external pectus carinatum protrusion as well as subjective patient and surgeon appraisal of appearance and exercise tolerance.
RESULTS: Nineteen (79.2%) patients have completed initial treatment (mean CP time, 4.3 +/- 2.1 months). There were 3 patients (12.5%) who were noncompliant, and 2 (8.3%) are still in the initial CP phase of therapy. Fourteen (58.3%) patients are presently in maintenance phase, nocturnally braced, and 2 (8.3%) have completed therapy. In patients completing initial treatment, the protrusion pectus carinatum protrusion (pre 22 +/- 6 vs post 6.0 +/- 6.2) and subjective appearance (change + 1.8+/-0.4) showed a significant improvement (P < .001 for both) with no change in exercise tolerance.
CONCLUSION: Compressive bracing results in a significant subjective and objective improvement in PC appearance in skeletally immature patients. However, patient compliance and diligent follow up appear to be paramount for the success of this method of treatment. Further studies are required to show the durability of this method of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16677884     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  5 in total

1.  Non-surgical treatment of pectus carinatum with the FMF® Dynamic Compressor System.

Authors:  Marcelo Martinez-Ferro; Gaston Bellia Munzon; Carlos Fraire; Constanza Abdenur; Emilio Chinni; Bruno Strappa; Laura Ardigo
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-03-17

2.  The effect on cardiopulmonary function after thoracoplasty in pectus carinatum: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Stephan Sigl; Barbara Del Frari; Carina Harasser; Anton H Schwabegger
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Clinical experience with orthotic repair of pectus carinatum.

Authors:  Iskander S Al-Githmi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

4.  Prevalence of pectus excavatum (PE), pectus carinatum (PC), tracheal hypoplasia, thoracic spine deformities and lateral heart displacement in thoracic radiographs of screw-tailed brachycephalic dogs.

Authors:  Renata Komsta; Zbigniew Osiński; Piotr Dębiak; Piotr Twardowski; Barbara Lisiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  ORTHOPEDIC APPROACH TO PECTUS DEFORMITIES: 32 YEARS OF STUDIES.

Authors:  Sydney Abrão Haje; Davi de Podestá Haje
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.