Literature DB >> 26922214

Ridge Preservation Using Composite Alloplastic Materials: A Randomized Control Clinical and Histological Study in Humans.

Yaniv Mayer1, Hadar Zigdon-Giladi2, Eli E Machtei3.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate (clinically, histologically, and histo-morphometrically) the use of composite materials (Biphasic calcium sulphate [BCS] with β Tri-Calcium Phosphate (β-TCP) and Hydroxyapatite [HA]) in extraction socket sites and compare it to un-disturbed natural healing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective clinical trial of 36 patients (40 extraction sockets) were randomly assigned to either test or control group. Alveolar ridge horizontal dimension was measured in the middle of the socket at crest and 3 and 6 mm subcrestally. Crestal vertical height was measured at baseline surgery and at 4 month re-entry, at which time bone core biopsies were harvested from the center of the edentulous ridge. Histo-morphometric evaluation of the samples was performed using hematoxylin & eosin stains and morphometric software.
RESULTS: The change in horizontal ridge width was higher in the control compared to the experimental group: 2.28 ± 2.36 mm versus 0.03 ± 2.32 mm (p = .007) at -3 mm and 2.28 ± 2.43 versus 0.035 ± 3.05 (p = .02) at -6 mm, for the experimental and control sites, respectively. The vertical distance form bone crest to neighboring horizontal line interconnecting the neighboring teeth was minimal in both groups (0.307 ± 2.01 mm versus 0.14 ± 2.03 mm [p = 0.41]). Residual scaffolds occupied 15.99 ± 11.4% of the volume in the grafted (test) sites while bone area fraction was not statistically different among the groups (47.7 ± 10.6% versus 52.6 ± 11.6%, test versus control, respectively p = .39). The percentage of connective tissue in the control group was significantly higher that test group (36.3 ± 19.4% versus 46.7 ± 10.6% test versus control, respectively, p = .013).
CONCLUSION: Ridge preservation technique using a combination of two synthetic bone grafts β-TCP and HA with BCS resulted in greater stability in the horizontal dimension after 4 months.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alloplast; beta TCP; bi phasic calcium sulphate; bone regeneration; bone resorption; socket preservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922214     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Canullo; M Del Fabbro; S Khijmatgar; S Panda; A Ravidà; G Tommasato; A Sculean; P Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Teresa Lombardi; Fabio Bernardello; Federico Berton; Davide Porrelli; Antonio Rapani; Alvise Camurri Piloni; Luca Fiorillo; Roberto Di Lenarda; Claudio Stacchi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Tooth Extraction Using Different Bone Graft Materials and Autologous Platelet Concentrates: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arturas Stumbras; Povilas Kuliesius; Gintaras Januzis; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-03-31

5.  Chitosan oligosaccharide inhibits skull resorption induced by lipopolysaccharides in mice.

Authors:  Ke Guo; Zong Lin Liu; Wen Chao Wang; Wei Feng Xu; Shi Qi Yu; Shan Yong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  Innovative Concepts and Recent Breakthrough for Engineered Graft and Constructs for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Inchingolo; Denisa Hazballa; Alessio Danilo Inchingolo; Giuseppina Malcangi; Grazia Marinelli; Antonio Mancini; Maria Elena Maggiore; Ioana Roxana Bordea; Antonio Scarano; Marco Farronato; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia; Felice Lorusso; Angelo Michele Inchingolo; Gianna Dipalma
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans.

Authors:  Marija Čandrlić; Matej Tomas; Matej Karl; Lucija Malešić; Aleksandar Včev; Željka Perić Kačarević; Marko Matijević
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies.

Authors:  Matej Tomas; Marija Čandrlić; Martina Juzbašić; Zrinka Ivanišević; Nikola Matijević; Aleksandar Včev; Olga Cvijanović Peloza; Marko Matijević; Željka Perić Kačarević
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Ridge Augmentation Using β-Tricalcium Phosphate and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Sphere with Collagen Membrane in Chronic Pathologic Extraction Sockets with Dehiscence Defect: A Pilot Study in Beagle Dogs.

Authors:  Jungwon Lee; Yong-Moo Lee; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.