Literature DB >> 26921836

The DEP-6D, a new preference-based measure to assess health states of dependency.

E Rodríguez-Míguez1, J M Abellán-Perpiñán2, X C Alvarez3, X M González4, A R Sampayo5.   

Abstract

In medical literature there are numerous multidimensional scales to measure health states for dependence in activities of daily living. However, these scales are not preference-based and are not able to yield QALYs. On the contrary, the generic preference-based measures are not sensitive enough to measure changes in dependence states. The objective of this paper is to propose a new dependency health state classification system, called DEP-6D, and to estimate its value set in such a way that it can be used in QALY calculations. DEP-6D states are described as a combination of 6 attributes (eat, incontinence, personal care, mobility, housework and cognition problems), with 3-4 levels each. A sample of 312 Spanish citizens was surveyed in 2011 to estimate the DEP-6D preference-scoring algorithm. Each respondent valued six out of the 24 states using time trade-off questions. After excluding those respondents who made two or more inconsistencies (6% out of the sample), each state was valued between 66 and 77 times. The responses present a high internal and external consistency. A random effect model accounting for main effects was the preferred model to estimate the scoring algorithm. The DEP-6D describes, in general, more severe problems than those usually described by means of generic preference-based measures. The minimum score predicted by the DEP-6D algorithm is -0.84, which is considerably lower than the minimum value predicted by the EQ-5D and SF-6D algorithms. The DEP-6D value set is based on community preferences. Therefore it is consistent with the so-called 'societal perspective'. Moreover, DEP-6D preference weights can be used in QALY calculations and cost-utility analysis.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEP-6D; Dependency; Preference-based measures; QALY; Spain; Time trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921836     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  2 in total

Review 1.  Dimensions Used in Instruments for QALY Calculation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Moustapha Touré; Christian R C Kouakou; Thomas G Poder
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  [Need and use of assistive devices and architectural facilitators in a dependent population].

Authors:  Ana María Rodríguez-González; Eva Rodríguez-Míguez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 1.137

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.