Literature DB >> 26921822

Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.

Johan Kälvesten1, Li-Yung Lui2, Torkel Brismar3, Steven Cummings2.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening of post-menopausal women for clinical risk factors and/or low bone mineral density (BMD) has been proposed to overcome this. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) estimates hand BMD from standard hand X-ray images and have shown to predict fractures and osteoporosis. Recently, digital radiology and the internet have opened up the possibility of conducting automated opportunistic screening with DXR in post-fracture care or in combination with mammography. This study compared the performance of DXR with FRAX® and DXA in discriminating major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm or shoulder), hip fracture and femoral neck osteoporosis. This prospective cohort study was conducted on 5278 women 65years and older in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) cohort. Baseline hand X-ray images were analyzed and fractures were ascertained during 10years of follow up. Age-adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MOF and hip fracture and for femoral neck osteoporosis (DXA FN BMD T-score ≤-2.5) was used to compare the methods. Sensitivity to femoral neck osteoporosis at equal selection rates was tabulated for FRAX and DXR. DXR-BMD, FRAX (no BMD) and lumbar spine DXA BMD were all similar in fracture discriminative performance with an AUC around 0.65 for MOF and 0.70 for hip fractures for all three methods. As expected femoral neck DXA provided fracture discrimination superior both to other BMD measurements and to FRAX. AUC for selection of patients with femoral neck osteoporosis was higher with DXR-BMD, 0.76 (0.74-0.77), than with FRAX, 0.69 (0.67-0.71), (p<0.0001). In conclusion, DXR-BMD discriminates incident fractures to a similar degree as FRAX and predicts femoral neck osteoporosis to a larger degree than FRAX. DXR shows promise as a method to automatically flag individuals who might benefit from an osteoporosis assessment.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Digital X-ray radiogrammetry; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; FRAX; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921822      PMCID: PMC4833670          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  28 in total

Review 1.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Walter Huda; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Clinical use of bone densitometry: clinical applications.

Authors:  David W Bates; Dennis M Black; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.

Authors:  Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Pierre Delmas; John A Eisman; Seiko Fujiwara; Heikki Kroger; Dan Mellstrom; Pierre J Meunier; L Joseph Melton; Terry O'Neill; Huibert Pols; Jonathan Reeve; Alan Silman; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Digital x-ray radiogrammetry identifies women at risk of osteoporotic fracture: results from a prospective study.

Authors:  P Bach-Mortensen; L Hyldstrup; M Appleyard; K Hindsø; P Gebuhr; S Sonne-Holm
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis--a review of the literature and a reference model.

Authors:  N Zethraeus; F Borgström; O Ström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Li-Yung Lui; Brent C Taylor; John T Schousboe; Meghan G Donaldson; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Warren S Browner; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

7.  The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A Laster; D J Becker; L Carbone; L C Gary; M L Kilgore; R S Matthews; M A Morrisey; K G Saag; S B Tanner; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK.

Authors:  J Compston; A Cooper; C Cooper; R Francis; J A Kanis; D Marsh; E V McCloskey; D M Reid; P Selby; M Wilkins
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; H Johansson; C De Laet; J Brown; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; C Christiansen; S Cummings; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; C Glüer; D Goltzman; D Hans; M-A Krieg; A La Croix; E McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; K Sanders; A-M Schott; A Silman; D Torgerson; T van Staa; N B Watts; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Hand bone loss as an outcome measure in established rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year observational study comparing cortical and total bone loss.

Authors:  Mari Hoff; Glenn Haugeberg; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inhibition of periarticular bone loss is associated with clinical remission and ACR70-Response in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Anica Nussbaum; Diane M Renz; Christian Jung; Peter Oelzner; Ansgar Malich; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Improving Bone Mineral Density Screening by Using Digital X-Radiogrammetry Combined With Mammography.

Authors:  Amshuman Rao; Elisabeth Elder; Jacqueline R Center; Thach Tran; Nicholas Pocock; Grahame J Elder
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-03-21

3.  Selection of risk assessment methods for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women with low-energy fractures: A comparison of fracture risk assessment tool, digital X-ray radiogrammetry, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Mischa Woisetschläger; Simona Chisalita; Marta Vergara; Anna Spångeus
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-01-15

4.  Risk factors of transport gap bending deformity in the treatment of critical-size bone defect after bone transport.

Authors:  Abulaiti Abula; Erlin Cheng; Alimujiang Abulaiti; Kai Liu; Yanshi Liu; Peng Ren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.