| Literature DB >> 26921421 |
Anne Mette Madsen1, Søren T Larsen2, Ismo K Koponen2, Kirsten I Kling2, Afnan Barooni2, Dorina Gabriela Karottki3, Kira Tendal2, Peder Wolkoff2.
Abstract
In the indoor environment, people are exposed to several fungal species. Evident dampness is associated with increased respiratory symptoms. To examine the immune responses associated with fungal exposure, mice are often exposed to a single species grown on an agar medium. The aim of this study was to develop an inhalation exposure system to be able to examine responses in mice exposed to mixed fungal species aerosolized from fungus-infested building materials. Indoor airborne fungi were sampled and cultivated on gypsum boards. Aerosols were characterized and compared with aerosols in homes. Aerosols containing 10(7)CFU of fungi/m(3)air were generated repeatedly from fungus-infested gypsum boards in a mouse exposure chamber. Aerosols contained Aspergillus nidulans,Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus ustus, Aspergillus versicolor,Chaetomium globosum,Cladosporium herbarum,Penicillium brevicompactum,Penicillium camemberti,Penicillium chrysogenum,Penicillium commune,Penicillium glabrum,Penicillium olsonii,Penicillium rugulosum,Stachybotrys chartarum, and Wallemia sebi They were all among the most abundant airborne species identified in 28 homes. Nine species from gypsum boards and 11 species in the homes are associated with water damage. Most fungi were present as single spores, but chains and clusters of different species and fragments were also present. The variation in exposure level during the 60 min of aerosol generation was similar to the variation measured in homes. Through aerosolization of fungi from the indoor environment, cultured on gypsum boards, it was possible to generate realistic aerosols in terms of species composition, concentration, and particle sizes. The inhalation-exposure system can be used to study responses to indoor fungi associated with water damage and the importance of fungal species composition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26921421 PMCID: PMC4959492 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.04063-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
In vitro studies with mice as the model animals exposed to fungi or fungal toxins
| Fungus | Growth matrix | Exposure method | Exposure concn | Studied effect | In relation to | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Intranasally | Culture extracts | Inflammation mechanisms | Asthma in industrialized countries | ||
| Agar: CMA and PDA | Nasal cavity | 20 μl with 107 spores/ml/mouse | Inflammation | Inhalation of fungi and rhinosinusitis | ||
| Agar: SDA | Intratracheally | 107 heat-killed or live conidia/mouse | Inflammation | Inhalation of fungi | ||
| Agar: SDA | Intranasal inoculation | 107 washed conidia/mouse | Inflammation | Allergic airway disease | ||
| Agar: SDA | Intratracheal injection | 2 × 108 washed or swollen conidia or 105 hyphae/mouse | Transport and infection | Inhalation and transplant recipients | ||
| NM | Intratracheal | 5 × 106 conidia/mouse | Inflammation and allergy | Indoor and outdoor exposure | ||
| Agar: SDA | Intranasally | 5 × 106 conidia/mouse | Inflammation | Fungal exposure and asthma | ||
| Agar: SDA | Intranasally | 2 × 106 conidia/mouse | Inflammation and clearance | Inhalation and inflammation | ||
| Agar: SDA | Inhalation | 3 × 10 min dead or alive conidia | Asthma | Indoor and outdoor exposure | ||
| Agar: MEA | Involuntary Aspiration | Living or dead conidia, 2 × 106/mouse | Inflammation | Indoor and outdoor exposure | ||
| Agar: MEA | Intratracheal instillations | 105–108 spores/mouse | Inflammation | Exposure in moisture damaged buildings | ||
| Agar: MEA | Intratracheally | 104 or 106 spores/mouse, 3 times | Inflammation | Exposure in the homes | ||
| Agar: SDA | Intravenous | 107 spores/mouse | Infection | Immunocompromised patients | ||
| NM | Intratracheal | Toxins and metabolites | Inflammatory and cytotoxic responses | Exposure in damp buildings | ||
| Nylon filter on agar: PDA | Deposited in oropharynx, mice inhaled the extract | Different weights of fungal antigen extract | Inflammation | Dampness in buildings | ||
| Agar | Intranasal injection | Toxins or 106 spores | Inflammation | Damp houses | ||
| NM | Intratracheal instillations | 7 × 104 spores/mouse | Changes in alveolar cells | Building occupants | ||
| Broth: cellulose | Aerosols from extracts in water | Extracts from spores | Irritation in the airways | Fungal growth in buildings |
Abbreviations: CMA, corn meal agar; SDA, Sabouraud dextrose agar; MEA, malt extract agar; PDA, potato dextrose agar; NM, not mentioned.
Outline of the study
| Characteristic | Part I | Part II | Part III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study target or activity | Fungal species in Danish homes. Variation in exposure to fungi in homes in 7-min intervals. | Aerosolization of fungal particles from gypsum boards colonized by fungi as a function of time and RH | Generation of fungal aerosols in an exposure chamber and characterization of generated aerosols |
| Level | 27 homes + 2 homes | Gypsum boards, LAF bench | Gypsum boards, exposure chamber |
| Method(s) | Sampling for species: EDC; sampling for variation and species: DGI. Quantification: cultivation. Identification: MALDI-TOF. | Sampling: EDCs in homes and offices.Inoculation: dust suspension on gypsum boards. Humidity: 50% of the cultures were dried out by lowering the RH. Generation of aerosols: P-FLEC with two airflows. Particle measurement: APS. Sampling: GSP samplers. Quantification: cultivation. | Sampling for inoculation: EDCs in a home and offices. Inoculation: dust suspension on gypsum boards. Generation of aerosols: P-FLEC with two airflows. Particle measurement: APS. Sampling: ELPI, GSP, MINI. Quantification: cultivation and LAL assay. Identification: MALDI-TOF. Microscopy: ESEM. |
| Size and scope | 27 homes (species); 2 homes during and between 4 activities (variation and species) | Gypsum boards infested with fungi in dust from 2 offices (sample A, 23 boards), 2 homes (sample B, 60 boards and sample C, 12 boards). Two RHs. | Gypsum boards infested with fungi in dust from 2 offices (sample A, 48 boards), 2 homes (sample C, 48 boards and sample D, 60 boards). Two RHs. |
Abbreviations: DGI, Dekati gravimetric impactor, a high-volume sampler; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight; RH, relative humidity; LAF, laminar flow cabinet; P-FLEC, particle field and laboratory emission cell; APS, aerodynamic particle sizer; GSP, Gesamtstaub-probenahme, an aerosol sampler; EDC, electrostatic dust collector; ELPI, electrical low-pressure impactor; MINI, micro-inertial impactor; ESEM, environmental scanning electron microscopy.
FIG 1Schematic illustration of the generation and exposure system. For explanations of abbreviations, see Table 2.
Dominating fungal species found in airborne settled dust samples from 27 homes and fungal species found in airborne dust from home I and in aerosols in the mouse exposure chamber
| Genus and species | No. of homes (part I) where the species is among the three most frequent found fungal species (in terms of concn in 27 homes) | Present in home (part I) | Present in aerosol in exposure chamber (part III) from GB inoculated with fungi | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home dust | Office dust | |||
| | 0 | + | − | − |
| | 2 | + | − | + |
| | 3 | − | + | − |
| | 2 | − | + | + |
| | 7 | + | + | + |
| 2 | − | − | − | |
| 2 | + | − | − | |
| 2 | − | − | + | |
| 4 | + | + | + | |
| 3 | − | − | − | |
| | 10 | + | + | + |
| | 10 | + | + | − |
| | 4 | + | + | + |
| | 3 | + | + | + |
| | 1 | − | − | − |
| | 1 | − | − | − |
| | 4 | − | − | − |
| | 0 | + | − | − |
| | 13 | + | + | + |
| | 2 | + | − | + |
| | 1 | − | − | − |
| | 1 | − | + | − |
| 1 | − | + | − | |
| 4 | + | − | + | |
Symbols and abbreviations: +, present; −, absent; GB, gypsum board.
Species identified in aerosols sampled during 1 h in different rooms in home I (part I) (see Fig. 2).
Fungal species in aerosols generated from fungi growing on gypsum boards; gypsum boards were inoculated with fungi in dust from a home (sample D) or from offices (sample A) (part III).
Group 1 fungi commonly present in U.S. homes and associated with water damage according to ERMI.
Group 2 fungi commonly present in U.S. homes but not associated with water damage according to ERMI (87).
FIG 2Variation in exposure (in CFU per cubic meter of air) to airborne fungi (size fraction, 1.2 to 3.0 μm or 3.0 to 10.0 μm) in rooms with different activities; measurements were performed in two homes. Fungal species in the two size fractions are identified for home I samples, the numbers in parentheses are the percentages of each species. “No” indicates measurements taken when a person is present in the room but no activity occurs.
Amounts of fungal spores aerosolized per min during 3 min of exposure of fungus-infested gypsum boards and geometric mean diameters of aerosolized particles
| Inoculum | Culture humidity level (RH%) | Airflow (m/s) | Calculated wt (μg/130 cm2/min) | Inhalable no. of fungi (CFU/130 cm2/min) | Geometric mean diam (μm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM20 | PM2.1 | ||||||
| Sample A fungi in office dust | Wet (57) | 6 | 1.5 | 11.3, | 0.11, | 3.51 × 105, | 2.79 (2.72–2.88) σg = 1.01–1.32 |
| Dry (26) | 6 | 1.5 | 41.6, | 0.21, | 4.61 × 106, | 2.91 (2.92–2.96) σg = 1.15–1.26 | |
| Sample B fungi in home dust | Wet (62) | 12 | 1.5 | 10.2, | 0.66, | 7.23 × 105, | 2.20 (1.8–2.5) σg = 1.17–1.23 |
| Dry (27) | 12 | 1.5 | 33.6, | 7.8, | 6.98 × 106, | 2.09 (1.92–2.41) σg = 1.20–1.52 | |
| Sample C fungi in home dust | Wet (64) | 6 | 3.0 | 31.4, | 1.27, | 3.11 × 106, | 2.18 (1.90–2.49) σg = 1.17–1.50 |
| Dry (23) | 6 | 1.5 | 38.0, | 1.71, | 4.92 × 106, | 2.27 (2.02–2.51) σg = 1.15–1.39 | |
Values are averages, medians (in boldface), and ranges (in parentheses). Values in the same column followed by the same lowercase letter are not statistically significantly different. PM2.1, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter below 2.1 μm; PM20, particulate matter with anaerodynamic diameter below 20 μm.
The mass is calculated from APS data with the assumption that particles are spherical and have a density of 1 (88).
σg, geometric standard deviation.
FIG 3Example of the number and size distribution of particles aerosolized from fungus-infested gypsum boards (inoculum sample A) as affected by an air exposure (1.5 m/s) in the first, second, and third minutes of exposure of the same area (RH = 54%) (a) and in the first minute (of 3 min) in three different places on the same board (RH = 23%) (b).
FIG 4Frequency of modes of particles (APS data) with different aerodynamic diameters (dae) in aerosols from each gypsum board (inoculum samples A and B, n = 30, part II), and every second minute in the exposure chamber (part III, wet gypsum board, inoculum sample D).
FIG 5Measurement of fungi in CFU (a and b), β-glucan in nanograms (a), and particles between 0.54 and 19.8 μm (a) in a mouse exposure chamber. Fungi were aerosolized from wet and dry gypsum boards (inoculum sample D); fungi were sampled by an ELPI in 14 size fractions (b); the 14 size fractions are pooled in panel a; fungi were sampled by a GSP sampler (a); β-glucan was sampled by a GSP sampler (a); the number of particles was determined by an APS (a). Time-weighted average concentrations were measured during a 1-hour exposure study and a control study (2 times 15 min). For abbreviations, see Table 2.
FIG 6Time-weighted average concentration (number per cubic meter) of fungal particles as a function of aerodynamic diameter (dae, μm) in a mouse exposure chamber as measured by an APS during a 60-min period. Aerosols were generated using two P-FLECs from fungi grown on gypsum boards (inoculum sample D) that were wet or dry or from a gypsum board without fungal growth (control).
FIG 7Average concentrations (number per cubic meter) of fungal particles as a function of aerodynamic diameter (dae, in micrometers) in a mice exposure chamber as measured by an APS during a 60-min period (a to h) and averages of 2-min intervals for the first 28 min (a to g) and for the last minutes (minutes 57 and 58 and minutes 59 and 60) (h). Aerosols were generated using two P-FLECs from mixed fungal species grown on gypsum boards. Examples are given for wet gypsum boards with sample D as inoculum.
FIG 8Fungal particles sampled from aerosols in a mouse exposure chamber. Aerosols were generated from fungus-infested gypsum boards which were wet or dry. Fungi were present as single spores (a, b, c, and k) of different sizes and shapes, chains of 3 spores from one species (d, e, f), clusters of spores from different species (g, h, i), residues (j; also indicated by circles in panels b and k), and small instable residues (l).