Literature DB >> 26921080

The Novel Scoring System for 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Sejin Hwang1, Seong Woo Jeon2, Joong Goo Kwon3, Dong Wook Lee3, Chang Yoon Ha4, Kwang Bum Cho5, ByungIk Jang6, Jung Bae Park7, Youn Sun Park8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the mortality rates for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) have recently decreased, it remains a significant medical problem. AIM: The main aim of this prospective multicenter database study was to construct a clinically useful predictive scoring system by using our predictors and compare its prognostic accuracy with that of the Rockall scoring system.
METHODS: Data were collected from consecutive patients with NVUGIB. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Each independent predictor was assigned an integral point proportional to the odds ratio (OR) and we used the area under the curve to compare the discrimination ability between the new predictive model and the Rockall score.
RESULTS: The independent predictors of mortality included age >65 years [OR 2.627; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.298-5.318], hemodynamic instability (OR 2.217; 95 % CI 1.069-4.597), serum blood urea nitrogen level >40 mg/dL (OR 1.895; 95 % CI 1.029-3.490), active bleeding at endoscopy (OR 2.434; 95 % CI 1.283-4.616), transfusions (OR 3.811; 95 % CI 1.640-8.857), comorbidities (OR 3.481; 95 % CI 1.405-8.624), and rebleeding (OR 10.581; 95 % CI 5.590-20.030). The new predictive model showed a high discrimination capability and was significantly superior to the Rockall score in predicting the risk of death (OR 0.837;95 % CI 0.818-0.855 vs. 0.761; 0.739-0.782; P = 0.0123).
CONCLUSIONS: The new predictive score was significantly more accurate than the Rockall score in predicting death in NVUGIB patients. We need to prospectively validate the accuracy of this score for predicting mortality in NVUGIB patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; Mortality; Prediction; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921080     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4087-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

1.  Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit.

Authors:  Sarah A Hearnshaw; Richard F A Logan; Derek Lowe; Simon P L Travis; Mike F Murphy; Kelvin R Palmer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Jung Hwan Oh; Hye Yeon Lee; Joon Won Jeong; Se Eun Go; Chan Ran You; Eun Jung Jeon; Sang Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding.

Authors:  John R Saltzman; Ying P Tabak; Brian H Hyett; Xiaowu Sun; Anne C Travis; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Predicting mortality in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after therapeutic endoscopy.

Authors:  Philip W Y Chiu; Enders K W Ng; Frances K Y Cheung; Francis K L Chan; W K Leung; Justin C Y Wu; Vincent W S Wong; M Y Yung; Kelvin Tsoi; James Y W Lau; Joseph J Y Sung; Sydney S C Chung
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Predictive factors of mortality from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Riccardo Marmo; Maurizio Koch; Livio Cipolletta; Lucio Capurso; Angelo Pera; Maria A Bianco; Rodolfo Rocca; Angelo Dezi; Renato Fasoli; Sergio Brunati; Ivano Lorenzini; Ugo Germani; Giovanni Di Matteo; Paolo Giorgio; Giorgio Imperiali; Giorgio Minoli; Fausto Barberani; Sandro Boschetto; Marco Martorano; Giovanni Gatto; Mariano Amuso; Alfredo Pastorelli; Elena S Torre; Omero Triossi; Andrea Buzzi; Renzo Cestari; Domenico Della Casa; Massimo Proietti; Anna Tanzilli; Giovanni Aragona; Francesco Giangregorio; Luciano Allegretta; Salvatore Tronci; Paolo Michetti; Paola Romagnoli; Andrea Nucci; Francesca Rogai; Walter Piubello; Maria Tebaldi; Fabrizio Bonfante; Alessandro Casadei; Claudio Cortini; Giorgio Chiozzini; Lisa Girardi; Claudio Leoci; Giampiero Bagnalasta; Sergio Segato; Giuseppe Chianese; Mario Salvagnini; Gianluca Rotondano
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ernst J Kuipers; Joseph Sung; Richard H Hunt; Myriam Martel; Paul Sinclair
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Uncomplicated peptic ulcer in the UK: trends from 1997 to 2005.

Authors:  S Cai; L A García Rodríguez; E L Massó-González; S Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based study.

Authors:  Silvano Loperfido; Vincenzo Baldo; Elena Piovesana; Ludovica Bellina; Katia Rossi; Marzia Groppo; Alessandro Caroli; Nadia Dal Bò; Fabio Monica; Luca Fabris; Helena Heras Salvat; Nicolò Bassi; Lajos Okolicsanyi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage before and after the adoption of the Rockall score, in the Italian Gastroenterology Units.

Authors:  Marco Soncini; Omero Triossi; Pietro Leo; Giovanna Magni; Anna Maria Bertelè; Tiziana Grasso; Luca Ferraris; Stefano Caruso; Antonio Spadaccini; Gianfranco Brambilla; Mario Verta; Rosangela Muratori; Antonio Attinà; Gianalberto Grasso
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 10.  Endoscopic hemostasis in peptic ulcer bleeding for patients with high-risk lesions: a series of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Youssef Toubouti; Elham Rahme; Marc Bardou
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Wenjie Yue; Yi Liu; Weiru Jiang; Jianping Huang; Jie Liu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Mingyang Song; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Predictors of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper digestive bleeding.

Authors:  Daniela Cornelia Lazăr; Sorin Ursoniu; Adrian Goldiş
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Evaluation of Six Preendoscopy Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes for Older Adults with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.260

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.