Literature DB >> 26920920

Male and female guppies differ in speed but not in accuracy in visual discrimination learning.

Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato1, Angelo Bisazza2.   

Abstract

In many species, males and females have different reproductive roles and/or differ in their ecological niche. Since in these cases the two sexes often face different cognitive challenges, selection may promote some degree of cognitive differentiation, an issue that has received relatively little attention so far. We investigated the existence of sex differences in visual discrimination learning in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, a fish species in which females show complex mate choice based on male colour pattern. We tested males and females for their ability to learn a discrimination between two different shapes (experiment 1) and between two identical figures with a different orientation (experiment 2). In experiment 3, guppies were required to select an object of the odd colour in a group of five objects. Colours changed daily, and therefore, the solution for this task was facilitated by concept learning. We found males' and females' accuracy practically overlapped in the three experiments, suggesting that the two sexes have similar discrimination learning abilities. Yet, males showed faster decision time than females without any evident speed-accuracy trade-off. This result indicates the existence of consistent between-sex differences in decision speed perhaps due to impulsivity rather than speed in information processing. Our results align with previous literature, indicating that sex differences in cognitive abilities are the exception rather than the rule, while sex differences in cognitive style, i.e. the way in which an individual faces a cognitive task, are much more common.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive sex differences; Cognitive style; Decision speed; Discrimination learning; Fish cognition; Poecilia reticulata

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920920     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-0969-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  10 in total

1.  Divergences in learning and memory among wild zebrafish: Do sex and body size play a role?

Authors:  Tamal Roy; Anuradha Bhat
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Learning and visual discrimination in newly hatched zebrafish.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Marco Dadda; Luisa Dalla Valle; Camilla Fontana; Gabriela Gjinaj; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Effect of reward type on object discrimination learning in socially monogamous coppery titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus).

Authors:  Sara M Freeman; Nancy Rebout; Karen L Bales
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Guppies Show Behavioural but Not Cognitive Sex Differences in a Novel Object Recognition Test.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Marco Dadda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Giant pandas can discriminate the emotions of human facial pictures.

Authors:  Youxu Li; Qiang Dai; Rong Hou; Zhihe Zhang; Peng Chen; Rui Xue; Feifei Feng; Chao Chen; Jiabin Liu; Xiaodong Gu; Zejun Zhang; Dunwu Qi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Symbol-value association and discrimination in the archerfish.

Authors:  Naomi Karoubi; Tali Leibovich; Ronen Segev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fish perform like mammals and birds in inhibitory motor control tasks.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Elia Gatto; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Seasonal variation in reversal learning reveals greater female cognitive flexibility in African striped mice.

Authors:  Céline Rochais; Hoël Hotte; Neville Pillay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Automated Operant Conditioning Devices for Fish. Do They Work?

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Maria Santacà; Ilaria Verza; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Poor numerical performance of guppies tested in a Skinner box.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Alberto Testolin; Angelo Bisazza; Marco Zorzi; Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.