Literature DB >> 29756654

Effect of reward type on object discrimination learning in socially monogamous coppery titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus).

Sara M Freeman1, Nancy Rebout2, Karen L Bales1.   

Abstract

Highly valued food items are often used as rewards to reinforce an animal's behavior. For social species, social interaction is rewarding and can drive an individual's behavior as well. In the currently study, we wanted to compare the efficacy of a food reward and a social reward on object discrimination learning in socially monogamous titi monkeys. We hypothesized that titi monkeys would perform more accurately for a social reward (their pair mate) than for a food reward (a highly desired food item). Eleven adult titi monkeys were tested with a two-object visual discrimination task for both types of reward. The colors and shapes of the objects in the two-object discrimination task were counterbalanced across subjects. During each trial, subjects were shown two objects, and the trial ended when the subject touched the reinforced shape (S+) or after 5 min. A correct trial was defined as one when the subject touched S+ first. We found that 45.5% of subjects were able to learn the task with a social reward, and 83.3% were able to learn the task with a food reward. We found that subjects balked more often and had fewer correct trials for the social reward. Finally, subjects took longer to approach the shapes for a social reward, possibly indicating lower motivation to engage in the task when a social reward is used compared to a food reward. Although significantly fewer subjects met criteria of success with the social reward than with the food reward, our results show that titi monkeys can learn a visual discrimination task with either type of reward.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  monogamy; nonhuman primate; positive reinforcement; social reward; visual discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29756654      PMCID: PMC6133243          DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  36 in total

1.  Comparison of two positive reinforcing stimuli: pups and cocaine throughout the postpartum period.

Authors:  B J Mattson; S Williams; J S Rosenblatt; J I Morrell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Working memory in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Maria Clotilde H Tavares; Carlos Tomaz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The effect of spatial contiguity of cue and reward in the object-quality learning of rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  J V MURPHY; R E MILLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1955-06

4.  Studies in discrimination learning by monkeys; discriminations between stimuli differing in both color and form, and only in color, and only in form.

Authors:  H F HARLOW
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1945

Review 5.  Evaluating the rewarding nature of social interactions in laboratory animals.

Authors:  Viviana Trezza; Patrizia Campolongo; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  The pairbond in the titi monkey (Callicebus moloch): intrinsic versus extrinsic contributions of the pairmates.

Authors:  G Anzenberger
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Social rank and responses to feeding competition in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  C Belzung; J R Anderson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Contrasting responses to intruders and to involuntary separation by monogamous and polygynous New World monkeys.

Authors:  S P Mendoza; W A Mason
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986

9.  Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin.

Authors:  Gül Dölen; Ayeh Darvishzadeh; Kee Wui Huang; Robert C Malenka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Development of relational memory processes in monkeys.

Authors:  Maria C Alvarado; Ludise Malkova; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.