Literature DB >> 26920430

Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study.

Thomas L Sanders1, Hilal Maradit Kremers2, Andrew J Bryan3, Dirk R Larson4, Diane L Dahm3, Bruce A Levy3, Michael J Stuart3, Aaron J Krych3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the general population is not well defined. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to define the population-based incidence of ACL tears, describe trends in ACL injuries over time, and evaluate changes in the rate of surgical management. The hypothesis was that the incidence of ACL injury and the rate of subsequent ACL reconstruction increase over time. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The study population included 1841 individuals who were diagnosed with new-onset, isolated ACL tears (without concomitant ligament injury that required surgery) between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2010. The complete medical records were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and to extract injury and treatment details. Age- and sex-specific incidence rates were calculated and adjusted to the 2010 US population. Poisson regression analyses were performed to examine incidence trends by age, sex, and calendar period.
RESULTS: The overall age- and sex-adjusted annual incidence of ACL tears was 68.6 per 100,000 person-years. Incidence was significantly higher in male patients than in females (81.7 vs 55.3 per 100,000, P < .001). The incidence of isolated ACL tears decreased significantly over time in males (P < .001) but remained relatively stable in females. Age-specific patterns differed in male and female patients, with a peak in incidence (241.0 per 100,000) between 19 and 25 years in males and a peak in incidence (227.6 per 100,000) between 14 and 18 years in females. The rate of ACL reconstruction increased significantly over time in all age groups (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: With an annual incidence of 68.6 per 100,000 person-years, isolated ACL tears remain a common orthopaedic injury. Differences in age-specific incidence trends in male and female patients may potentially reflect differences in sports participation patterns through the high school and college years. The significant increase in the rate of ACL reconstruction over time may reflect changing surgical indications or an increasing desire among patients to return to high levels of activity after ACL injury.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; ACL tear; epidemiology; incidence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920430     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516629944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  219 in total

1.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades.

Authors:  Markus P Arnold; Jacob G Calcei; Nicole Vogel; Robert A Magnussen; Mark Clatworthy; Tim Spalding; John D Campbell; John A Bergfeld; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Deep Learning for Detection of Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.

Authors:  Peter D Chang; Tony T Wong; Michael J Rasiej
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Are IL1B, IL6 and IL6R Gene Variants Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Susceptibility?

Authors:  Ewelina Lulińska-Kuklik; Ewelina Maculewicz; Waldemar Moska; Krzysztof Ficek; Mariusz Kaczmarczyk; Monika Michałowska-Sawczyn; Kinga Humińska-Lisowska; Maciej Buryta; Jakub Chycki; Pawel Cięszczyk; Piotr Żmijewski; Agata Rzeszutko; Marek Sawczuk; Petr Stastny; Miroslav Petr; Agnieszka Maciejewska-Skrendo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Authors:  J T Cassidy; E Fitzgerald; E S Cassidy; M Cleary; D P Byrne; B M Devitt; J F Baker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Post-traumatic osteoarthritis diagnosed within 5 years following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephan G Bodkin; Brian C Werner; Lindsay V Slater; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Atopic dermatitis is a novel demographic risk factor for surgical site infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Manabu Kawata; Yusuke Sasabuchi; Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Time for a Different Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Educate and Create Realistic Expectations.

Authors:  Joshua Robert Zadro; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Nonsurgical Management of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee in a Women's Soccer Player: A Validation Clinical Case Report.

Authors:  Courtney E Gray; Chris Hummel; Todd Lazenby
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Evaluating Different Clinical Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures In Providers with Different Training Backgrounds.

Authors:  Alexander Cm Chong; Chelsea Whitetree; Michael C Priddy; Parker R Zimmerman; Paul R Haeder; Daniel J Prohaska
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.