Literature DB >> 26920098

The Effect of Postoperative Face-Down Positioning and of Long- versus Short-Acting Gas in Macular Hole Surgery: Results of a Registry-Based Study.

Rohan W Essex1, Zabrina S Kingston2, Margarita Moreno-Betancur3, Bruce Shadbolt4, Alex P Hunyor5, William G Campbell6, Paul P Connell7, Ian L McAllister8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas is noninferior to longer-acting gases in macular hole surgery and whether withholding postoperative face-down positioning (FDP) is noninferior to FDP.
DESIGN: Registry-style, prospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with idiopathic macular holes undergoing primary surgery.
METHODS: Surgeons were invited to submit clinical details of all macular hole cases receiving surgery. Baseline demographic and clinical information were collected, as well as details of surgical intervention and postoperative posturing advice. Primary follow-up data were collected 3 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Macular hole closure at 3 months. A noninferiority approach was used, with a noninferiority margin set at 5% decreased frequency of success.
RESULTS: A total of 2456 eyes of 2367 patients were included in the study. Outcomes were available in 94.9% of cases (2330/2456). The rate of macular hole closure was 95.0% (2214/2330). Sulfur hexafluoride gas was found to be noninferior to longer-acting gases (95% confidence interval [CI] for adjusted effect on success, -1.76 to +2.25), and noninferiority was demonstrated regardless of macular hole size. Although withholding FDP was found to be noninferior to FDP for the study population as a whole (95% CI for adjusted effect on success, -4.21 to +0.64), the result was inconclusive in holes >400 μm in diameter (95% CI, -9.31 to +1.04). Lack of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel, increasing hole size, hole duration ≥9 months, increasing age, and 20-gauge surgery all were associated with lower odds of success. Vitreous attachment to the hole margin was not associated with outcome when corrected for hole size, and combined phacovitrectomy surgery was not observed to affect the odds of success in phakic eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade was noninferior to longer-acting gases in the surgical management of macular hole. Withholding FDP was noninferior to FDP in holes ≤400 μm in diameter. In holes >400 μm in diameter, noninferiority of withholding FDP could not be concluded. We would advise caution if posturing is withheld in this group on the basis of the results of this study and of others.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920098     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of Complications for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole Surgery Performed by Vitreoretinal Fellows and Consultants.

Authors:  Saud Aljohani; Abdulaziz Alshehri; Abdulaziz Al Taisan; Rakan Algorinees; Valmore A Semidey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-07

2.  Patient adherence to the face-down positioning after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shimada; Yui Seno; Tadashi Mizuguchi; Atsuhiro Tanikawa; Masayuki Horiguchi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-08

3.  Adherence to the face-down positioning after vitrectomy and gas tamponade: a time series analysis.

Authors:  Keita Suzuki; Yoshiaki Shimada; Yui Seno; Tadashi Mizuguchi; Atsuhiro Tanikawa; Masayuki Horiguchi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-02-20

Review 4.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) versus Perfluoropropane (C3F8) in the Intraoperative Management of Macular Holes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Idan Hecht; Michael Mimouni; Eytan Z Blumenthal; Yoreh Barak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  FIRST FAILED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY OR REOPENING OF A PREVIOUSLY CLOSED HOLE: Do We Gain by Reoperating?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerard A Reid; Niamh McDonagh; David M Wright; John T O Yek; Rohan W Essex; Noemi Lois
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.975

7.  Limited Vitrectomy in Patients with Idiopathic Macular Hole

Authors:  Berna Özkan; Veysel Levent Karabaş; Büşra Yılmaz Tuğan; Özgül Altıntaş
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.021

8.  Facedown Positioning Following Surgery for Large Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Saruban Pasu; Lauren Bell; Zohra Zenasni; Doris Lanz; Irene A Simmonds; Ann Thompson; David Yorston; D Alistair H Laidlaw; Catey Bunce; Richard Hooper; James W B Bainbridge
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Hole diameter ratio for prediction of anatomical outcomes in stage III or IV idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Yue Qi; Yanping Yu; Qisheng You; Zengyi Wang; Jing Wang; Wu Liu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Objective analysis of perfluoropropane tamponade area after pars plana vitrectomy using ultra-widefield fundus stereographic projection images.

Authors:  Mihyun Choi; Suji Hong; Cheolmin Yun; Seong-Woo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.