Literature DB >> 26918411

Comparison of image sensitivity between conventional tensor-based and fast diffusion kurtosis imaging protocols in a rodent model of acute ischemic stroke.

Yin Wu1,2, Jinsuh Kim3, Suk-Tak Chan1, Iris Yuwen Zhou1, Yingkun Guo1, Takahiro Igarashi1, Hairong Zheng2, Gang Guo4, Phillip Zhe Sun1,3.   

Abstract

Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) can offer a useful complementary tool to routine diffusion MRI for improved stratification of heterogeneous tissue damage in acute ischemic stroke. However, its relatively long imaging time has hampered its clinical application in the emergency setting. A recently proposed fast DKI approach substantially shortens the imaging time, which may help to overcome the scan time limitation. However, to date, the sensitivity of the fast DKI protocol for the imaging of acute stroke has not been fully described. In this study, we performed routine and fast DKI scans in a rodent model of acute stroke, and compared the sensitivity of diffusivity and kurtosis indices (i.e. axial, radial and mean) in depicting acute ischemic lesions. In addition, we analyzed the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the ipsilateral ischemic and contralateral normal regions using both conventional and fast DKI methods. We found that the mean kurtosis shows a relative change of 47.1 ± 7.3% between the ischemic and contralateral normal regions, being the most sensitive parameter in revealing acute ischemic injury. The two DKI methods yielded highly correlated diffusivity and kurtosis measures and lesion volumes (R(2)  ⩾ 0.90, p < 0.01). Importantly, the fast DKI method exhibited significantly higher CNR of mean kurtosis (1.6 ± 0.2) compared with the routine tensor protocol (1.3 ± 0.2, p < 0.05), with its CNR per unit time (CNR efficiency) approximately doubled when the scan time was taken into account. In conclusion, the fast DKI method provides excellent sensitivity and efficiency to image acute ischemic tissue damage, which is essential for image-guided and individualized stroke treatment.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute stroke; contrast-to-noise ratio; diffusion kurtosis imaging; mean diffusion; mean kurtosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26918411      PMCID: PMC4833647          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  50 in total

Review 1.  MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for neural tissue characterization.

Authors:  Ed X Wu; Matthew M Cheung
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jiachen Zhuo; Su Xu; Julie L Proctor; Roger J Mullins; Jonathan Z Simon; Gary Fiskum; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Non-Gaussian diffusion in human brain tissue at high b-factors as examined by a combined diffusion kurtosis and biexponential diffusion tensor analysis.

Authors:  Farida Grinberg; Ezequiel Farrher; Joachim Kaffanke; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Mean Diffusional Kurtosis in Patients with Glioma: Initial Results with a Fast Imaging Method in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  A Tietze; M B Hansen; L Østergaard; S N Jespersen; R Sangill; T E Lund; M Geneser; M Hjelm; B Hansen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Preliminary observations of increased diffusional kurtosis in human brain following recent cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Maria F Falangola; Caixia Hu; Ali Tabesh; Otto Rapalino; Calvin Lo; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Els Fieremans; Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Ali Tabesh; Jens H Jensen; Babak A Ardekani; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Parkinson disease: diagnostic utility of diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Jiun-Jie Wang; Wey-Yil Lin; Chin-Song Lu; Yi-Hsin Weng; Shu-Hang Ng; Chi-Hong Wang; Hao-Li Liu; Ren-Hsiang Hsieh; Yung-Liang Wan; Yau-Yau Wai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences.

Authors:  Peter Raab; Elke Hattingen; Kea Franz; Friedhelm E Zanella; Heinrich Lanfermann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  11 in total

1.  A comparative study of the sensitivity of diffusion-related parameters obtained from diffusion tensor imaging, diffusional kurtosis imaging, q-space analysis and bi-exponential modelling in the early disease course (24 h) of hyperacute (6 h) ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Gaëtan Duchêne; Frank Peeters; André Peeters; Thierry Duprez
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  In vivo microscopic diffusional kurtosis imaging with symmetrized double diffusion encoding EPI.

Authors:  Yang Ji; Jeffrey Paulsen; Iris Yuwen Zhou; Dongshuang Lu; Patrick Machado; Bensheng Qiu; Yi-Qiao Song; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  pH imaging reveals worsened tissue acidification in diffusion kurtosis lesion than the kurtosis/diffusion lesion mismatch in an animal model of acute stroke.

Authors:  Enfeng Wang; Yin Wu; Jerry S Cheung; Iris Yuwen Zhou; Takahiro Igarashi; XiaoAn Zhang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Fast imaging of mean, axial and radial diffusion kurtosis.

Authors:  Brian Hansen; Noam Shemesh; Sune Nørhøj Jespersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Fast diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with Inherent COrrelation-based Normalization (ICON) enhances automatic segmentation of heterogeneous diffusion MRI lesion in acute stroke.

Authors:  Iris Yuwen Zhou; Yingkun Guo; Takahiro Igarashi; Yu Wang; Emiri Mandeville; Suk-Tak Chan; Lingyi Wen; Mark Vangel; Eng H Lo; Xunming Ji; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  JOURNAL CLUB: Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Stroke Lesion With Hemodynamic and Metabolic MRI in a Rodent Model of Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Dongshuang Lu; Yinghua Jiang; Yang Ji; Iris Yuwen Zhou; Emiri Mandeville; Eng H Lo; Xiaoying Wang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Beyond Diffusion Tensor MRI Methods for Improved Characterization of the Brain after Ischemic Stroke: A Review.

Authors:  E V R DiBella; A Sharma; L Richards; V Prabhakaran; J J Majersik; S K HashemizadehKolowri
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hannah M Lindsey; Cooper B Hodges; Kaitlyn M Greer; Elisabeth A Wilde; Tricia L Merkley
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 9.  Refined Ischemic Penumbra Imaging with Tissue pH and Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jesse Cheung; Madeline Doerr; Ranliang Hu; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.800

10.  Stroke infarct volume estimation in fixed tissue: Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging to diffusion weighted imaging and histology in a rodent MCAO model.

Authors:  Vibeke Bay; Birgitte F Kjølby; Nina K Iversen; Irene K Mikkelsen; Maryam Ardalan; Jens R Nyengaard; Sune N Jespersen; Kim R Drasbek; Leif Østergaard; Brian Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.