| Literature DB >> 26917272 |
M Yousefifard1, V Rahimi-Movaghar2, F Nasirinezhad3, M Baikpour4, S Safari5, S Saadat2, A Moghadas Jafari6, H Asady7, S M T Razavi Tousi1, M Hosseini8.
Abstract
Despite the vast improvements of cell therapy in spinal cord injury treatment, no optimum protocol has been developed for application of neural stem/progenitor cells. In this regard, the present meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of the neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation depends mainly on injury model, intervention phase, transplanted cell count, immunosuppressive use, and probably stem cell source. Improved functional recovery post NSPC transplantation was found to be higher in transection and contusion models. Moreover, NSPC transplantation in acute phase of spinal injury was found to have better functional recovery. Higher doses (>3×10(6)cell/kg) were also shown to be optimum for transplantation, but immunosuppressive agent administration negatively affected the motor function recovery. Scaffold use in NSPC transplantation could also effectively raise functional recovery.Entities:
Keywords: functional recovery; neural stem cells; neuropathic pain; spinal cord injuries
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2016 PMID： 26917272 DOI： 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroscience ISSN： 0306-4522 Impact factor: 3.590