| Literature DB >> 26917089 |
Kalyani B Sonawane Deshmukh1, Jingjing Qian1, Kimberly B Garza1, Bradley M Wright2,3, Peng Zeng4, Cecilia M Ganduglia Cazaban5, Richard A Hansen6.
Abstract
Data on the long-term outcomes of the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) or free-pill combinations (FPCs), titration of doses, and switching are currently unavailable for identifying a preferred strategy for adherence. In the lack of these evidences, adherence can be a useful guiding criteria. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using the BlueCross BlueShield of Texas (2008-2012) database to compare adherence among 5998 patients who received treatment modifications (TMs). Results of the propensity score-adjusted model indicate that FDC and uptitration strategies have higher odds of adherence compared with the switch strategy (P<.05). Among patients with a history of poor adherence, the odds of adherence were up to 26% higher for the FDC strategy compared with alternative strategies (P<.05). Factors including age, number of comedications, first-line drug class, and health services utilization are associated with adherence. In conclusion, FDCs should be prioritized for TM, particularly if the patient has a history of poor adherence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26917089 PMCID: PMC8031934 DOI: 10.1111/jch.12799
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ISSN: 1524-6175 Impact factor: 3.738