Tom Lesluyes1, Gaëlle Pérot2, Marine Roxane Largeau3, Céline Brulard4, Pauline Lagarde4, Valérie Dapremont5, Carlo Lucchesi6, Agnès Neuville2, Philippe Terrier7, Dominique Vince-Ranchère8, Maria Mendez-Lago9, Marta Gut9, Ivo Gut9, Jean-Michel Coindre10, Frédéric Chibon11. 1. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Aquitaine Science Transfert, Centre Condorcet, Pessac, France; Site de Recherche Intégrée sur le Cancer, Bordeaux Recherche Intégrée en Oncologie, Bordeaux, France. 2. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. 3. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Aquitaine Science Transfert, Centre Condorcet, Pessac, France. 4. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. 5. Département de pathologie, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. 6. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Site de Recherche Intégrée sur le Cancer, Bordeaux Recherche Intégrée en Oncologie, Bordeaux, France. 7. Département de pathologie, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. 8. Département de pathologie, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 9. Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG), Barcelona, Spain. 10. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France. 11. Inserm U916, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Département de pathologie, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: f.chibon@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prognosis of metastatic outcome in soft tissue sarcomas is an important clinical challenge since these tumours can be very aggressive (up to 50% of recurring events). A gene expression signature, Complexity INdex in SARComas (CINSARC), has been identified as a better prognostic factor compared to the current international grading system defined by the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Since CINSARC has been established on frozen tumours analysed by microarrays, we were interested in evaluating its prognostic capacity using next generation sequencing (NGS) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks to better fit laboratory practices. METHODS: Metastatic-free survivals (training/validation approach with independent datasets) and agreement values in classification groups were evaluated. Also, RNA degradation threshold has been established for FFPE blocks and differences in gene expression due to RNA degradation were measured. RESULTS: CINSARC remains a strong prognostic factor for metastatic outcome in both microarray and RNA-seq technologies (P < 0.05), with similar risk-group classifications (77%). We defined quality threshold to process degraded RNA extracted from FFPE blocks and measured similar classifications with frozen tumours (88%). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that CINSARC is a platform and material independent prognostic signature for metastatic outcome in various sarcomas. This result opens access to metastatic prognostication in sarcomas through NGS analysis on both frozen and FFPE tumours via the CINSARC signature.
BACKGROUND: Prognosis of metastatic outcome in soft tissue sarcomas is an important clinical challenge since these tumours can be very aggressive (up to 50% of recurring events). A gene expression signature, Complexity INdex in SARComas (CINSARC), has been identified as a better prognostic factor compared to the current international grading system defined by the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Since CINSARC has been established on frozen tumours analysed by microarrays, we were interested in evaluating its prognostic capacity using next generation sequencing (NGS) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks to better fit laboratory practices. METHODS: Metastatic-free survivals (training/validation approach with independent datasets) and agreement values in classification groups were evaluated. Also, RNA degradation threshold has been established for FFPE blocks and differences in gene expression due to RNA degradation were measured. RESULTS: CINSARC remains a strong prognostic factor for metastatic outcome in both microarray and RNA-seq technologies (P < 0.05), with similar risk-group classifications (77%). We defined quality threshold to process degraded RNA extracted from FFPE blocks and measured similar classifications with frozen tumours (88%). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that CINSARC is a platform and material independent prognostic signature for metastatic outcome in various sarcomas. This result opens access to metastatic prognostication in sarcomas through NGS analysis on both frozen and FFPE tumours via the CINSARC signature.
Authors: Gerardo A Vitiello; Timothy G Bowler; Mengyuan Liu; Benjamin D Medina; Jennifer Q Zhang; Nesteene J Param; Jennifer K Loo; Rachel L Goldfeder; Frederic Chibon; Ferdinand Rossi; Shan Zeng; Ronald P DeMatteo Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jason A Hanna; Catherine J Drummond; Matthew R Garcia; Jonathan C Go; David Finkelstein; Jerold E Rehg; Mark E Hatley Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David A Largaespada; Jaime F Modiano; Subbaya Subramanian; Milcah C Scott; Nuri A Temiz; Anne E Sarver; Rebecca S LaRue; Susan K Rathe; Jyotika Varshney; Natalie K Wolf; Branden S Moriarity; Timothy D O'Brien; Logan G Spector; Aaron L Sarver Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Naser M Ali; Stefania Niada; Anna T Brini; Mark R Morris; Sathishkumar Kurusamy; Abdullah Alholle; David Huen; Cristina R Antonescu; Franck Tirode; Vaiyapuri Sumathi; Farida Latif Journal: J Pathol Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Matthew L Hemming; Changyu Fan; Chandrajit P Raut; George D Demetri; Scott A Armstrong; Ewa Sicinska; Suzanne George Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Matthew L Hemming; Matthew A Lawlor; Rhamy Zeid; Tom Lesluyes; Jonathan A Fletcher; Chandrajit P Raut; Ewa T Sicinska; Frédéric Chibon; Scott A Armstrong; George D Demetri; James E Bradner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 11.205