Literature DB >> 26915721

Five-Year Biochemical Progression-Free Survival Following Salvage Whole-Gland Prostate Cryoablation: Defining Success with Nadir Prostate-Specific Antigen.

Evan Kovac1, Ahmed ElShafei1,2, Kae Jack Tay3, Melissa Mendez3, Thomas J Polascik3, J Stephen Jones1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Salvage prostate cryoablation is an effective treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer relapse following primary radiotherapy. The postsalvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir that best predicts long-term biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) is not yet defined. We sought to determine what nadir PSA best predicted success following salvage whole-gland cryoablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 486 hormone-naive patients who underwent salvage whole-gland cryoablation from the Cryo On-Line Database (COLD). Studied variables were age, race, initial PSA, presalvage prostate-specific antigen (psPSA), initial Gleason score, Gleason score at presalvage biopsy, clinical stage, and follow-up PSA values. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was used to calculate 5-year bPFS using the Phoenix criteria. Hazard ratio and relative risk were also analyzed. Differences among the KM estimates, at 5 years, were calculated using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Using group thresholds, KM analysis identified nadir PSA less than or greater than 0.4 ng/mL as the nadir PSA threshold, with the greatest difference in bPFS. The KM estimated 5-year bPFS was 75.5% and 22.1% for nadir PSA <0.4 and ≥0.4 ng/mL, respectively. Stratified by psPSA, the KM estimated 5-year bPFS comparing patients with PSA nadir <0.4 vs ≥0.4 ng/mL was 78.5% and 17.9% (p < 0.0001) for psPSA <4 ng/mL, 77.1% and 15.7% (p < 0.0001) for psPSA 4-10 ng/mL, and 77.8% and 16.8% (p < 0.0001) for psPSA >10 ng/mL, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The best objective indicator of biochemical success following whole-gland salvage cryoablation of the prostate is PSA nadir <0.4 ng/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26915721     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  miR-192 Is Overexpressed and Promotes Cell Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Zhong-Jun Chen; You-Ji Yan; Hao Shen; Jia-Jie Zhou; Guang-Hua Yang; Yi-Xiang Liao; Jin-Min Zeng; Tao Yang
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 2.  Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicole M Golbari; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Management of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Curative Treatment: A Focus on Older Patients.

Authors:  Lancelot Tremeau; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.271

4.  Salvage Cryoablation for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Initial Experience at a Regional Health Care System.

Authors:  Seena Safavy; Ramzi B Jabaji; Sharon M Lu; Jeff M Slezak; Harry A Cosmatos; Stephen G Williams; David S Finley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

5.  Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Individualized Partial Gland Cryoablation of the Prostate: A Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Wei Phin Tan; Andrew Chang; Christina Sze; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  High-intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) as salvage therapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: predictors of disease response.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Nathan C Wong; Christopher B Allard; Jen Hoogenes; William Orovan; Bobby Shayegan
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.