Literature DB >> 26915685

Combination of pedCAT® for 3D Imaging in Standing Position With Pedography Shows No Statistical Correlation of Bone Position With Force/Pressure Distribution.

Martinus Richter1, Stefan Zech2, Sarah Hahn3, Issam Naef3, David Merschin3.   

Abstract

pedCAT(®) (CurveBeam, Warrington, PA) is a technology for 3-dimensional (3D) imaging with full weightbearing that has been proved to exactly visualize the 3D bone position. For the present study, a customized pedography sensor (Pliance; Novel, Munich, Germany) was inserted into the pedCAT(®). The aim of our study was to analyze the correlation of the bone position and force/pressure distribution. A prospective consecutive study of 50 patients was performed, starting July 28, 2014. All patients underwent a pedCAT(®) scan and simultaneous pedography with full weightbearing in the standing position. The following parameters were measured on the pedCAT(®) image for the right foot by 3 different investigators 3 times: lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch angle, and minimum height of the fifth metatarsal base, second to fifth metatarsal heads, and medial sesamoid. From the pedography data, the following parameters were defined using the standardized software algorithm: midfoot contact area, maximum force of midfoot, maximum force of midfoot lateral, maximum force of entire foot, and maximum pressure of first to fifth metatarsal. The values of the corresponding pedCAT(®) and pedographic parameters were correlated (Pearson). The intra- and interobserver reliability of the pedCAT(®) measurements were sufficient (analysis of variance, p > .8 for each, power >0.8). No sufficient correlation was found between the pedCAT(®) and pedographic parameters (r < 0.05 or r > -0.38).3D bone position did not correlate with the force and pressure distribution under the foot sole during simultaneous pedCAT(®) scanning and pedography. Thus, the bone positions measured with pedCAT(®) do not allow conclusions about the force and pressure distribution. However, the static pedographic parameters also do not allow conclusions about the 3D bone position.one position and force/pressure distribution are important parameters for diagnostics, planning, and follow-up examinations in foot and ankle surgery.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D imaging; bone position; force distribution; pedCAT(®); pedography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26915685     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  5 in total

1.  Coupled Active Shape Models for Automated Segmentation and Landmark Localization in High-Resolution CT of the Foot and Ankle.

Authors:  M Brehler; A Islam; L Vogelsang; D Yang; W Sehnert; D Shakoor; S Demehri; J H Siewerdsen; W Zbijewski
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 2.  Weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography in the foot and ankle specialty: where we are and where we are going - an update.

Authors:  Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos; Alessio Bernasconi; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues; François Lintz; Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo; Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2021 May-Jun

3.  Weight-bearing cone beam CT scans in the foot and ankle.

Authors:  François Lintz; Cesar de Cesar Netto; Alexeij Barg; Arne Burssens; Martinus Richter
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

4.  Three-dimensional kinematic change of hindfoot during full weightbearing in standing: an analysis using upright computed tomography and 3D-3D surface registration.

Authors:  Kazuya Kaneda; Kengo Harato; Satoshi Oki; Tomohiko Ota; Yoshitake Yamada; Minoru Yamada; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Angular and linear measurements of adult flexible flatfoot via weight-bearing CT scans and 3D bone reconstruction tools.

Authors:  Maurizio Ortolani; Alberto Leardini; Chiara Pavani; Silvia Scicolone; Mauro Girolami; Roberto Bevoni; Giada Lullini; Stefano Durante; Lisa Berti; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.