| Literature DB >> 26915521 |
Susanne Elisabeth Pors1, Ragnhild Bager Skjerning2, Esben M Flachs3, Anders Miki Bojesen4.
Abstract
Gallibacterium anatis is a Gram-negative bacterium and major cause of salpingitis and peritonitis in egg-laying hens, thereby contributing to decreased egg production and increased mortality among the hens. Due to widespread drug resistance and antigenic diversity, novel prophylactic measures are urgently required. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cross-protective capacity of three recombinant proteins recently identified as potential vaccine candidates; GtxA-N, GtxA-C, and FlfA, in an in vivo challenge model. Nine groups of birds were immunized twice with each protein, respectively, with 14 days separation. Additionally, three groups served as non-immunized controls. After 3 weeks, the birds were challenged with either of three G. anatis strains: 12656-12, 7990 or IPDH 697-78, respectively. Blood samples were taken at three different time points prior to challenge, as well as 48 h after challenge. All birds were euthanized and subjected to a post mortem procedure including scoring of lesions and sampling for bacterial growth. Moreover, ELISA assays were used to quantify antigen-specific IgG titers in serum. The results showed that all three proteins induced protection against the homologous strain 12656-12. No protein induced complete protection against strain 7990, although FlfA reduced the bacterial re-isolation rate. Moreover, immunization with GtxA-N and FlfA induced protection, while GtxA-C reduced the bacterial re-isolation, against strain IPDH 697-78. Thus although complete cross-protection against all three strains was not achieved, the results hold great promise for a new generation of immunogens in the search for novel prophylactic measures against G. anatis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26915521 PMCID: PMC4766669 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-016-0320-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Immunization and challenge
| Protein | Challenge strain | No. of birds (day 0/35)a |
|---|---|---|
| GtxA-C | 7990 | 20/19 |
| GtxA-N | 20/19 | |
| FlfA | 20/17 | |
| Placebo | 20/17 | |
| GtxA-C | IPDH 697-78 | 20/20 |
| GtxA-N | 20/20 | |
| FlfA | 20/20 | |
| Placebo | 20/15 | |
| GtxA-C | 12656-12 | 40/38 |
| GtxA-N | 40/39 | |
| FlfA | 40/36 | |
| Placebo | 40/35 |
Immunization with one of three recombinant proteins was done at day 0 and 14, followed by challenge with a G. anatis strain at day 35.
a A total of 25 birds showed feather pecking behavior and were removed from the study between day 14 and day 35, in order to prevent development cannibalism among the birds.
Scoring of lesions in birds infected with
| Organ | Description | Score | Protective response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peritoneum | Normal | 0 | Yes |
| Mild cloudiness | 1 | ||
| Moderate cloudiness and serous exudates | 2 | ||
| Moderate cloudiness and serous exudates with fibrin spots | 3 | No | |
| Complete cloudiness and local fibrinopurulent exudates | 4 | ||
| Complete cloudiness and diffuse fibrinopurulent exudate | 5 | ||
| Ovary | Normal | 0 | Yes |
| Mild vascular congestion. No deform follicles | 1 | ||
| Moderate vascular congestion. Max. one deform follicle | 2 | ||
| Complete vascular congestion and serous exudates with fibrin spots. Deformed follicles | 3 | No | |
| Complete vascular congestion and fibrinopurulent exudate | 4 | ||
| Complete vascular congestion, fibrinopurulent exudate and deformed follicles | 5 | ||
| Oviduct | Normal | 0 | Yes |
| Vascular congestion | 1 | ||
| Vascular congestion, edema and serous exudates | 2 | ||
| Vascular congestion, edema and local fibrinopurulent exudates | 3 | No | |
| Vascular congestion, edema and diffuse fibrinopurulent exudates | 4 | ||
| Vascular congestion, edema, diffuse fibrinopurulent exudates and necrosis | 5 |
48 h after challenge all birds were euthanized and scoring of lesions was done accordingly. Scores 0, 1 and 2 were regarded as inflammatory reaction without infection and considered as a protective response against infection. Scores 3, 4 and 5 was regarded as inflammation with infection and considered as no protection of the response, i.e., infection had overwhelmed the inflammatory response.
Figure 1Lesion scores in immunized or non-immunized birds 48 h after challenge. The columns show the number of birds with a protective response (white bars) or a non-protective response (black bars). Groups were immunized twice with GtxA-N, GtxA-C, FlfA or buffer only (placebo), prior to challenge. Significant differences (P < 0.05) to the control group are marked with *.
Figure 2Re-isolation of in immunized or non-immunized birds 48 h after challenge. The growth of G. anatis was scored 0–5: 0 (no colonies), 1 (<10 colonies), 2 (10–200 colonies), 3 (>200 colonies), and 4 (dense/florid growth). The total bacterial load was calculated by summation of all scores. Significant differences (P < 0.05) to the control group are marked with *.
Figure 3Titer values of protein specific IgG in serum. Sera was obtained and analyzed from immunized and non-immunized birds before each immunization, before challenge, and 48 h after challenge. Sera from non-immunized birds did not show any significant differences at the different time-points and are therefore represented with one bar. Significant differences (P < 0.05) to the control group are marked with *.