| Literature DB >> 26914881 |
Bjørn Borsøe Christensen1, Casper Bindzus Foldager2, Morten Lykke Olesen3, Louise Vingtoft4, Jan Hendrik Duedal Rölfing5, Steffen Ringgaard6, Martin Lind7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A gold standard treatment for articular cartilage injuries is yet to be found, and a cost-effective and predictable large animal model is needed to bridge the gap between in vitro studies and clinical studies. Ideally, the animal model should allow for testing of clinically relevant treatments and the biological response should be reproducible and comparable to humans. This allows for a reliable translation of results to clinical studies.This study aimed at verifying the Göttingen minipig as a pre-clinical model for articular cartilage repair by testing existing clinical cartilage repair techniques and evaluating the use of two defects per knee.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Articular cartilage; Bone graft; Cartilage chips; Göttingen minipig
Year: 2015 PMID: 26914881 PMCID: PMC4538720 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-015-0031-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Orthop ISSN: 2197-1153
Fig. 1The study design. ACC, Autologous cartilage chips. MFx, Microfracture. MACI, Matrix induced autologous chondrocyte implantation. ABG, Autologous boe graft. ADTT, Autologous Dual-Tissue Transplantation. Pig sketch from www.servier.com
Description of the five different treatment groups and the empty chondral- and osteochondral control groups
| Treatment | Type |
| Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empty full-thickness chondral defect | Full thickness chondral | 3 | Ø 6 mm full thickness chondral defect left untreated. |
| Autologous cartilage chips (ACC) | Full thickness chondral | 2 | This treatment was applied to a full-thickness chondral defect. A 6 mm chondral defect was created using a skin biopsy punch, and the harvested cartilage was cut into chips approximately 0.5 mm2, using a scalpel. The cartilage chips were embedded in fibrin glue and added to the defect, secured using fibrin glue. |
| Microfracture (MFx) | Full thickness chondral | 3 | The 6 mm defect was debrided so only the subchondral bony plate was left. Small perforations of the subchondral bone plate were made (Ø 1 mm), and the mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow cells were allowed to enter the full-thickness chondral defect. |
| Matrix-induced articular cartilage implantation (MACI) | Full thickness chondral | 2 | A collagen I/III membrane seeded with autologous chondrocytes was placed in a full-thickness chondral defect and secured using suture. Cartilage biopsies were performed one month prior to the surgery. The cartilage biopsies were cultured as previously described (Christensen |
| Empty osteochondral defect | Osteochondral | 3 | Ø 6 mm, 8 mm deep defect left untreated. |
| Autologous bone graft (ABG) | Osteochondral | 15 | A drill hole was made using a hand drill to avoid heat damage. The bone was collected and morselized into a paste and press-fitted into the osteochondral defect. Finally, the defect was sealed using fibrin glue (Tissel Duo Quick, Baxter Denmark). |
| Autologous Dual-Tissue Transplantation (ADTT) | Osteochondral | 15 | As above ABG is press-fitted into the osteochondral defect. A cartilage biopsy, taken before drilling, was cut into cartilage chips approximately 0.5 mm2 in size. The autologous cartilage chips (ACC) were then embedded in fibrin glue, and added onto the ABG |
Fig. 2Macroscopic images of (a) a single defect knee, and (b) a double defect knee. The defects have been marked with circles 1–3. The defects in these images have all been treated with ADTT. Remains of cartilage chips can be seen in all three defects as white areas in the defect. P, Proximal, D, Distal, M, Medial and L, Lateral
The histological results of all treatment groups, assessed according to cellular morphology, GAG staining and repair tissue surface
| Treatment | Cellular Morphology | GAG-Staining | Repair tissue surface |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empty chondral defect (Fig. | Mixture of | Negative | Smooth, but depressed |
| Autologous cartilage chips (Fig. | Predominantly | Negative | Smooth |
| MFx (Fig. |
| <50 % | Smooth, but depressed |
| MACI (Fig. | H | Negative | Smooth, but depressed |
| Empty osteochondral defect (Fig. | Predominantly | <10 % | Smooth, but depressed |
| Autologous bone graft (Fig. | Mixture of | <50 % | Smooth, but depressed. Slight fissuring observed |
| ADTT (Fig. |
| <50 % | Smooth, but slightly depressed |
GAG, Glycosaminoglycan. GAG staining percentage was assessed semi-quantitatively. MFx, Microfracture, MACI, Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, ADTT, Autologous dual-tissue transplantation
Fig. 3Histological images of the seven groups. In each group (1) is HE stained, (2) is Safranin-O stained and (3) is a higher magnification stained with Toluidine blue. a1-3 Black arrows: Defect area. Red arrow: fibrous tissue. b1 Black arrows: Defect area. Red arrow: An example of cartilage flow phenomenon. b2 Black arrows: Defect area. b3 Red arrows: vascular tissue, Black arrows: fibrocytes. c1 Black arrows: Defect area, c2 Black arrows: Defect area, red arrow: MFx drill tunnel. c3 Black arrow: Transition area from healthy tissue to repair tissue. Red arrow: Fibrocartilage. d1-3 Black arrows: Defect area. Red arrows: Chondrocytes in lacunaes embedded in fibrous tissue. d1-3 Black arrows: Defect area. Red arrow: Cartilage chip. f1-3 Black arrows: Defect area. red arrow: fibrocytes. g1-3 Black arrows: Defect area, red arrows: Chondrocytes in lacunae embedded in fibrous tissue
The radiological results of all treatment groups
| Treatment method | Time-point | Bone defect repair (CT) | Repair tissue surface (MRI) | Subchondral tissue – MRI and CT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empty chondral defect, (Fig. | 3 months | NA | Persistent full-diameter chondral defect | Slight subchondral signal changes |
| 6 months | NA | Small persistent chondral defect, with surface fissuring | Slight subchondral signal changes | |
| Autologous cartilage chips, (Fig. | 3 months | NA | Intact surface, slightly irregular, with slight signal changes. | No subchondral signal changes |
| 6 months | NA | Intact surface, with slight signal changes. | No subchondral signal changes | |
| MFx, (Fig. | 3 months | NA | Slight surface depression, and surface fissuring. Repair tissue non-cartilaginous, non-bony | Signal changes around the MFx holes, and signs of subchondral cyst formation |
| 6 months | NA | Slight surface depression. No surface fissuring. Repair tissue non-cartilaginous, non-bony | Marked subchondral signal changes. No subchondral cyst formation | |
| MACI, (Fig. | 3 months | NA | Slight surface depression, but smooth surface covered with non-cartilaginous, non-bony tissue | Subchondral signal changes |
| 6 months | NA | Slight surface depression, but smooth surface covered with non-cartilaginous, non-bony tissue | No subchondral signal changes | |
| Empty Osteochondral defect, (Fig. | 3 months | 50 % | Persistent defect | Persistent bone defect. The surrounding bone were less dense than native subcortical bone |
| 6 months | 67 % | Marked surface depression with non-cartilaginous, non-bony tissue | Persistent bone defect. Sclerotic edge, and subchondral bone cyst formation | |
| Autologous bone graft, (Fig. | 3 months | 63 % | Slight surface depression. Repair tissue non-cartilaginous, non-bony | Persistent bone defect, with fibrous repair tissue. No cyst formation or edema |
| 6 months | 76 % | Slight surface depression. Repair tissue non-cartilaginous, non-bony | Persistent bone defect with fibrous repair tissue. No cyst formation or edema | |
| ADTT, (Fig. | 3 months | 83 % | Slight surface depression. Defect partially covered by cartilage-like tissue | Superficial fibrous tissue, with profound bone repair. Small persistent bone defect |
| 6 months | 92 % | Slight surface depression. Defect almost completely covered with cartilage-like tissue | Almost complete bone repair |
The repair tissue surface was assessed using MRI, while the subchondral tissue was assessed using MRI and CT. The bone defect repair percentage is a measure of the degree of repair compared to the original defect volume. MFx, Microfracture, MACI, Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, ADTT, Autologous dual002Dtissue transplantation
Fig. 4MRI of the four chondral treatment groups. a Empty chondral defect, b Microfracture. The MFx drill holes can be seen in the subchondral area. c Autologous cartilage chips and d MACI. The white arrows mark the defects
Fig. 5MRI and corresponding CT for the empty osteochondral defects (a and d), autologous bone graft (b and e) and the ADTT treated defects (c and f). Incomplete subchondral bone repair with a cyst-like appearance is seen in d)
The ICRS II subcategories for the single defect knees and the double defect knees of study 2
| ICRS II category | ADTT proximal | ADTT distal | ADTT single | ABG proximal | ABG distal | ABG single |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue morphology | 38.3 ± 8.2 | 41.7 ± 7.3 | 36.7 ± 1.7 | 15.8 ± 6.4 | 20.0 ± 7.7 | 11.7 ± 3.3 |
| Material staining | 67.3 ± 11.2 | 70.0 ± 11.3 | 86.6 ± 8.8 | 40.0 ± 10 | 51.7 ± 15.5 | 35.0 ± 27.8 |
| Cell morphology | 40.0 ± 7.2 | 40.0 ± 8.2 | 36.7 ± 1.7 | 16.7 ± 6.3 | 20.8 ± 7.7 | 11.7 ± 3.3 |
| Clusters | 55.8 ± 14.5 | 67.6 ± 17.5 | 90.0 ± 5.7 | 69.2 ± 12.7 | 57.5 ± 19 | 58.3 ± 26.8 |
| Surface architecture | 35.0 ± 6.7 | 38.3 ± 11.1 | 36.7 ± 18.6 | 64.2 ± 10.4 | 40.1 ± 5.5 | 23.3 ± 13.7 |
| Basal integration | 60.0 ± 5.2 | 52.5 ± 8.7 | 40.0 ± 0 | 64.2 ± 5.2 | 54.2 ± 10.7 | 25.0 ± 7.6 |
| Tidemark formation | 24.2 ± 10.8 | 20.8 ± 9.3 | 21.7 ± 8.3 | 8.3 ± 3.3 | 19.2 ± 11.6 | 8.3 ± 4.4 |
| Subchondral bone | 23.3 ± 9.4 | 25.8 ± 9.6 | 35.0 ± 7.6 | 45.8 ± 6.9 | 49.2 ± 10.5 | 18.3 ± 7.3 |
| Vascularization | 58.3 ± 18.5 | 65.0 ± 14.3 | 40.0 ± 23.1 | 35.8 ± 15.1 | 49.2 ± 21.3 | 33.3 ± 33 |
| Surface assessment | 30.8 ± 7.9 | 26.7 ± 9.1 | 31.7 ± 15.9 | 35.0 ± 11.4 | 34.2 ± 9.2 | 21.7 ± 14.8 |
| Deep assessment | 47.5 ± 7.3 | 43.3 ± 7.6 | 43.3 ± 12 | 46.7 ± 8.3 | 58.3 ± 6 | 18.3 ± 4.4 |
| Overall assessment | 48.8 ± 3 | 50.0 ± 3.3 | 52.0 ± 3 | 48.1 ± 3.4 | 49.4 ± 4.4 | 31.0 ± 3.7 |
“Single”, “proximal” and “distal” corresponds to Fig. 2, circle 1, 2 and 3 respectively. No significant difference was found between any defect location in neither the ADTT group nor the ABG group