Danielle K DePeralta1, Lan Wei1, Sarani Ghoshal1, Benjamin Schmidt1, Gregory Y Lauwers2, Michael Lanuti3, Raymond T Chung4, Kenneth K Tanabe1, Bryan C Fuchs1. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-associated mortality is increasing at an alarming rate, and there is a readily identifiable cohort of at-risk patients with cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and diabetes. These patients are candidates for chemoprevention. Metformin is an attractive agent for chemoprevention because it is inexpensive, has a favorable safety profile, and is well tolerated over long time periods. METHODS: The authors studied the efficacy of metformin as a prevention agent in a clinically relevant rat model of HCC, in which tumors develop in the setting of chronic inflammation and cirrhosis. Repeated injections of diethylnitrosamine were used to induce sequential cirrhosis and HCC, and metformin was administered at the first signs of either fibrosis or cirrhosis. RESULTS: Prolonged metformin exposure was safe and was associated with decreases in fibrotic and inflammatory markers, especially when administered early at the first signs of fibrosis. In addition, early metformin treatment led to a 44% decrease in HCC incidence, whereas tumor burden was unchanged when metformin was administered at the first signs of cirrhosis. It is noteworthy that activation of the hepatic progenitor/stem cell compartment was first observed at the onset of cirrhosis; therefore, only early metformin treatment suppressed receptor for advanced glycation end products and inhibited the activation of hepatic progenitor cells. CONCLUSIONS: The current results are the first to demonstrate an effect on progenitor/stem cells in the setting of chemoprevention and provide further rationale to explore metformin as an early intervention in clinical trials of patients with chronic liver disease at high risk for HCC.
BACKGROUND:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-associated mortality is increasing at an alarming rate, and there is a readily identifiable cohort of at-risk patients with cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and diabetes. These patients are candidates for chemoprevention. Metformin is an attractive agent for chemoprevention because it is inexpensive, has a favorable safety profile, and is well tolerated over long time periods. METHODS: The authors studied the efficacy of metformin as a prevention agent in a clinically relevant rat model of HCC, in which tumors develop in the setting of chronic inflammation and cirrhosis. Repeated injections of diethylnitrosamine were used to induce sequential cirrhosis and HCC, and metformin was administered at the first signs of either fibrosis or cirrhosis. RESULTS: Prolonged metformin exposure was safe and was associated with decreases in fibrotic and inflammatory markers, especially when administered early at the first signs of fibrosis. In addition, early metformin treatment led to a 44% decrease in HCC incidence, whereas tumor burden was unchanged when metformin was administered at the first signs of cirrhosis. It is noteworthy that activation of the hepatic progenitor/stem cell compartment was first observed at the onset of cirrhosis; therefore, only early metformin treatment suppressed receptor for advanced glycation end products and inhibited the activation of hepatic progenitor cells. CONCLUSIONS: The current results are the first to demonstrate an effect on progenitor/stem cells in the setting of chemoprevention and provide further rationale to explore metformin as an early intervention in clinical trials of patients with chronic liver disease at high risk for HCC.
Authors: K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Sao Jiralerspong; Shana L Palla; Sharon H Giordano; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Cornelia Liedtke; Chad M Barnett; Limin Hsu; Mien-Chie Hung; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Craig J Currie; Chris D Poole; Sara Jenkins-Jones; Edwin A M Gale; Jeffrey A Johnson; Christopher Ll Morgan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mozhdeh Sojoodi; Lan Wei; Derek J Erstad; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Hadassa Hirschfield; Rosa S Kim; Gregory Y Lauwers; Michael Lanuti; Yujin Hoshida; Kenneth K Tanabe; Bryan C Fuchs Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-04-06
Authors: Mohammad Elsayed; William Wagstaff; Keywan Behbahani; Alexander Villalobos; Zachary Bercu; Bill S Majdalany; Mehmet Akce; David M Schuster; Hui Mao; Nima Kokabi Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 2.740