PURPOSE: Population studies have suggested that metformin use in diabetic patients decreases cancer incidence and mortality. Metformin inhibits the growth of cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo. However, there is little clinical data to support this. Our purpose was to determine whether metformin use was associated with a change in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in diabetic patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 2,529 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer between 1990 and 2007. Patients were compared by groups: 68 diabetic patients taking metformin, 87 diabetic patients not taking metformin, and 2,374 nondiabetic patients. pCR rates were compared between the three groups using chi(2) tests of independence and compared pair- wise using a binomial test of proportions. Factors predictive of pCR were assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: The rate of pCR was 24% in the metformin group, 8.0% in the nonmetformin group, and 16% in the nondiabetic group (P = .02). Pairwise comparisons between the metformin and nonmetformin groups (P = .007) and the nonmetformin and nondiabetic groups (P = .04) were significant. Comparison of the pCR rates between the metformin and nondiabetic groups trended toward but did not meet significance (P = .10). Metformin use was independently predictive of pCR (odds ratio, 2.95; P = .04) after adjustment for diabetes, body mass index, age, stage, grade, receptor status, and neoadjuvant taxane use. CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients with breast cancer receiving metformin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher pCR rate than do diabetics not receiving metformin. Additional studies to evaluate the potential of metformin as an antitumor agent are warranted.
PURPOSE: Population studies have suggested that metformin use in diabeticpatientsdecreases cancer incidence and mortality. Metformin inhibits the growth of cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo. However, there is little clinical data to support this. Our purpose was to determine whether metformin use was associated with a change in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in diabeticpatients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 2,529 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer between 1990 and 2007. Patients were compared by groups: 68 diabeticpatients taking metformin, 87 diabeticpatients not taking metformin, and 2,374 nondiabetic patients. pCR rates were compared between the three groups using chi(2) tests of independence and compared pair- wise using a binomial test of proportions. Factors predictive of pCR were assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: The rate of pCR was 24% in the metformin group, 8.0% in the nonmetformin group, and 16% in the nondiabetic group (P = .02). Pairwise comparisons between the metformin and nonmetformin groups (P = .007) and the nonmetformin and nondiabetic groups (P = .04) were significant. Comparison of the pCR rates between the metformin and nondiabetic groups trended toward but did not meet significance (P = .10). Metformin use was independently predictive of pCR (odds ratio, 2.95; P = .04) after adjustment for diabetes, body mass index, age, stage, grade, receptor status, and neoadjuvant taxane use. CONCLUSION:Diabeticpatients with breast cancer receiving metformin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher pCR rate than do diabetics not receiving metformin. Additional studies to evaluate the potential of metformin as an antitumor agent are warranted.
Authors: Reuben J Shaw; Katja A Lamia; Debbie Vasquez; Seung-Hoi Koo; Nabeel Bardeesy; Ronald A Depinho; Marc Montminy; Lewis C Cantley Journal: Science Date: 2005-11-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Valentina Guarneri; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Massimo Cristofanilli; Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Thomas Buchholz; Funda Meric; Lavinia Middleton; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vladimir N Anisimov; Lev M Berstein; Peter A Egormin; Tatiana S Piskunova; Irina G Popovich; Mark A Zabezhinski; Irina G Kovalenko; Tatiana E Poroshina; Anna V Semenchenko; Mauro Provinciali; Francesca Re; Claudio Franceschi Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2005 Aug-Sep Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Amal Melhem-Bertrandt; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Xiudong Lei; Erika N Brown; Richard T Lee; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anil K Sood; Suzanne D Conzen; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana-Maria Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Chiara Bardella; Martina Olivero; Annalisa Lorenzato; Massimo Geuna; Julie Adam; Linda O'Flaherty; Pierre Rustin; Ian Tomlinson; Patrick J Pollard; Maria Flavia Di Renzo Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Pei Zhu; Meghan Davis; Amanda J Blackwelder; Nora Bachman; Bolin Liu; Susan Edgerton; Leonard L Williams; Ann D Thor; Xiaohe Yang Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-12-09
Authors: A Ari Hakimi; Ling Chen; Philip H Kim; Daniel Sjoberg; Leonard Glickman; Marc R Walker; Paul Russo Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.862