Literature DB >> 26913651

Ethics Consultation Quality Assessment Tool: A Novel Method for Assessing the Quality of Ethics Case Consultations Based on Written Records.

Robert A Pearlman1, Mary Beth Foglia1, Ellen Fox2, Jennifer H Cohen1, Barbara L Chanko1, Kenneth A Berkowitz1.   

Abstract

Although ethics consultation is offered as a clinical service in most hospitals in the United States, few valid and practical tools are available to evaluate, ensure, and improve ethics consultation quality. The quality of ethics consultation is important because poor quality ethics consultation can result in ethically inappropriate outcomes for patients, other stakeholders, or the health care system. To promote accountability for the quality of ethics consultation, we developed the Ethics Consultation Quality Assessment Tool (ECQAT). ECQAT enables raters to assess the quality of ethics consultations based on the written record. Through rigorous development and preliminary testing, we identified key elements of a quality ethics consultation (ethics question, consultation-specific information, ethical analysis, and conclusions and/or recommendations), established scoring criteria, developed training guidelines, and designed a holistic assessment process. This article describes the development of the ECQAT, the resulting product, and recommended future testing and potential uses for the tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical ethics; ethics consultation; organizational ethics; professional ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26913651     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1134704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  12 in total

1.  The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.

Authors:  Kathryn M Porter; Marion Danis; Holly A Taylor; Mildred K Cho; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Philosophy of Healthcare Ethics Practice Statements: Quality Attestation and Beyond.

Authors:  Lauren Notini
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-12

3.  Reinforcing medical authority: clinical ethics consultation and the resolution of conflicts in treatment decisions.

Authors:  Katrina Hauschildt; Raymond De Vries
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2019-09-29

4.  The use of an online comment system in clinical ethics consultation.

Authors:  Katrina Hauschildt; Trisha K Paul; Raymond De Vries; Lauren B Smith; Christian J Vercler; Andrew G Shuman
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-05-30

5.  What Is the Minimal Competency for a Clinical Ethics Consult Simulation? Setting a Standard for Use of the Assessing Clinical Ethics Skills (ACES) Tool.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson; William H Adams; Kenneth Berkowitz; Marion Danis; Arthur R Derse; Mark G Kuczewski; Michael McCarthy; Kayhan Parsi; Anita J Tarzian
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-07-11

6.  Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.

Authors:  Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon; Yun Ting Ong; Hong Wei Yap; Kuang Teck Tay; Elijah Gin Lim; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Wei Qiang Lim; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Ying Pin Toh; Min Chiam; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS).

Authors:  Jan Schildmann; Stephan Nadolny; Joschka Haltaufderheide; Marjolein Gysels; Jochen Vollmann; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Identifying disincentives to ethics consultation requests among physicians, advance practice providers, and nurses: a quality improvement all staff survey at a tertiary academic medical center.

Authors:  Lynette Cederquist; Jamie Nicole LaBuzetta; Edward Cachay; Lawrence Friedman; Cassia Yi; Laura Dibsie; Yiran Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  In pursuit of goodness in bioethics: analysis of an exemplary article.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Morten Magelssen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support.

Authors:  Eva M Van Baarle; Marieke C Potma; Maria E C van Hoek; Laura A Hartman; Bert A C Molewijk; Jelle L P van Gurp
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.